hitting a domestic animal is dumb, its not the worst thing you could do morally, certainly not as morally wrong as hitting a child. hitting a self aware, and incredibly young being is so much worse than smacking a domestic animal around. your dog will attack you if you hit it too much, itll get you back. a kid would just have a dramatically worse life, trust me
and you think a dog wouldnt?you think that poor dog sitting in the corner pissing and shitting on itself while it shaking with its head held down thinks that how life is supposed to be?do really think that animal is sitting there saying its normal for me to get the shit kicked out of me cuz i barked,or wanted to eat,wanted to play with the nieghbors kids.
It's all animal abuse; human is an animal. If anything, this thread would be better if it was child abuse versus kitten abuse. And in that case, I'm sure we all know which is worse =(
(child abuse is only ok if the child is your younger brother who keeps trying to steal your stash damnit!) ..... jk but seriously man abuse is very wrong and both child and animal abuse are equally wrong btw wth is this poll doing in the stoners lounge? just curious...
:iagree: Not necessarily. I know of dogs that were abused but just sat there and took it. And hitting isn't the only kind of abuse a dog can take. I got my old dog when he was 4 months old. His previous owners had chained him in the basement and neglected him. The vets told me he was going to die. How would a dog fight back against that? I'm not sure how to respond to this poll, though. My friend's dog had used as bait for dog fighting, now she's incredibly skittish and constantly fearful. How could anything be worse than that? I'm incredibly passive, but I would physically destroy anyone who would harm any other living thing child or adult, human or animal.
both need to be put in their place from time to time.. but when you go over the line.. its wrong either way.. kid or animal.. in the end.. we're just animals too
abuse is a manmade concept, so humans, due to our particular type of consciousness, suffer more psychologically as a result of it... i didn't vote either way, btw, bcos all abuse is damaging... it just depends on perspective...
i am an abuser...maryjane that is,im sorry my green little honey i had to touch you you were so sticky and wet mm,now ima smoke you bitch!
yeah i cant help but Bongrape this bowl of purple haze right here im sorry but i gotta set you on fire baby so i can get high..!!
Are you fucking kidding me??? In what world is harming an animal the same as harming a HUMAN life?? (obviously I'm not condoning animal abuse either) We're talking about kids here people. Sorry, but you can replace a dog, you can't replace your child.
I can't vote for any of them. I would save my family members before my dog though if I had to choose. Humans live longer than animals so it makes more sense haha.
Yeah, child abuse is way... way worse. The worst sorts of vile people. Not that animal abuse is charming. It's bad too. Unless it's like one of those things where a guy is trying to get a tiger to balance on a ball, and the tiger eats him.
I would rather strangle a monkey bare handed. That was not inuendo, and I'm not trying to have sex with you.
one is just more socially unacceptable. anyways it's like asking saying killing someone (without consent) painlessly is better than torture one seems to bare positives but let's not split hairs over which is worse.
I would say killing someone without consent is better than torture. Sometimes even fun. I know it's an academic argument, cause we're not going to go out punching babies and kittens to prove our points, but it's not splitting hairs necessarily. Hurting humans is worse because human lives have more value. That's subjective of course. Objectively human lives are worthless. There are 7 billion of the mother fuckers.