A few of us have been debating about which is better, good technical sex or emotional sex. For me, I had a playmate who would watch my reactions, look for what aroused me and wait patiently for me to cum. Over time his technique was second to none, but it was just sex. Yet with someone you care for the sex seems different, lust drives the sex rather than technique, but does that make it better? Here's the debate, so far: "I agree technical sex can have a very different outcome than emotional sex, why is that though? I believe it's because technical sex or non-emotional sex is free from the inhibitions and constraints of emotions" says Billy. “Very different indeed, the raw sex is fun, quick, lusty, but very empty. I’ve been connected with someone but connected in different ways and the sex to me has been in the long run much better. They are both sex and I had plenty of both, porn is for the brain, lusty sex is quick satisfaction, deeper sex is to learn something about yourself if you decide to," said Thunderbolt. Are they different? Which is better?
Yea put both of those together. Get the WHOLE experience. I feel sex should be the most connective thing you can physically do. You should totally lose yourself in the other person.
Emotional sex is wayyyy better. Great naked bodies and interesting positions are interesting but when I am inside my wife and just gently thrusting life is perfect. I love rubbing her fat belly (she hates this) and the intimacy that cocoons us. We have been together 16 years and the sex is better than ever.