Says new study, I'm a bit skeptical of course as a meat eater but this definitely could have profound implications of diet if the "any amount is bad" part is true. Anywho here's the article. http://www.latimes.com/health/la-he-red-meat-20120313,0,565423.story More than likely red meat has to be eaten in moderation to be safe and dietary sound, but I'll wait for further studies to be conducted to change my meat habits completely.
Centarian societies (well, I guess I should say societies with a large percentage of people living over 100) generally do not eat red meat as well. Iron has been shown to speed the aging process.
If we went by every single study they did, we wouldn't be able to eat vegetables (unless we grew them ourselves), drink milk, eat any wheats (GLUTENNNN!), eat fish, poultry, red meat, and just about anything else on this planet. Looks like we're stuck to eating grass and drinking purified water... The grass can't be fertilized, though. And the water can't be bottled. Plastic causes cancer.
Yeah, living longer isn't really a motivating factor for me. It's not the reason I don't smoke, I exercise a lot and am not fat.
People used to think that sugar was bad for you and artificial sweeteners were good for you. Now, it's almost common knowledge that some sugar is needed and artificial sweeteners are poison. People used to think that marijuana was a dangerous drug, but anti depressants were helpful. And there's an unending list of food and drugs that were deemed unhealthy that aren't, and just as long a list of "healthy" substitutes that are harmful. So, excuse me if I doubt the honesty and integrity of this study and wonder about its agenda.
I lost my taste for beef about 12 years ago. I may eat some chicken or have a pork chop a few times a month. It wasn't a conscious decision; it just didn't taste good to me anymore.
I've lost my taste for meat recently, but mostly chicken. I ate a chicken breast last year that was the size of the entire plate. I ate like two bites and got grossed out at the sheer size of that thing. I haven't really eaten chicken since. I think with anything, moderation is key. Red meat is a HUGE part of the American diet now, in a way that is not healthy at all. (I speak for America because I have no idea how much red meat people from other countries eat). Meat was a small part of our diet one hundred years ago. It was a luxury. Now, if fast food and the menu at most restaurants are any testament, it makes up the majority of the average America's diet. Its the food pyramid turned upside down.
Yeah I gross-out on all that commercially grown chicken breast. It's such a huge fad too, chicken pizza, chicken pasta, chicken subs... it's cause its ' lean white meat'. It's disgusting
It's not like you'll be sitting up there going "damn, that was a pretty short I shouldn't have had so much meat".
the problem with this sort of study is it's empirical orientation you could likely find a positive link between wearing a certain colored socks and lung cancer if you looked hard enough. it's data mining.
How? Not sure what you mean here, unless you're implying vegetarians tend to live healthier so the causal effect is dubious.
Bad for you if you want to become 100 indeed. I love the sense in most replies. Moderation is key indeed. It also depends on what you do daily of course. Some people can eat more red meat than others. The world would be much better off if we would consume a reasonable amount of red meat instead of mixing it in almost all our meals in some way or another (like they do with chicken as well like zombiewolf said). Look at the cow industry in some places, it is equally disgusting as those gigantic chicken barns.