I don't know what to make of it. The 'evidence' is very much clutching at straws but I wouldn't put it past these people. I wouldn't at all. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kFHcOw9INj4&feature=related I've said before if something happens at the Olympics this year I will be pretty sure it is an false flag for whatever they want to do next. They've already been saying about how much 'extra security' will be needed and that it might stay after the Olympics are over. http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2012/mar/12/london-olympics-security-lockdown-london I don't trust these people who hold the positions of power. They're just people and corrupt ones at that. It's been proven time and time again.
I was sent some sources for this a while back. Never really ended up digging into it. Been meaning to though. I should scrounge them up and post them. It is very likely. Another false flag is going to be needed soon. And how much they advertise the complete militarization of this city is also quite suspicious. Here's one of the links I was sent. I don't use these forums, but the thread has a lot of information on it. http://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?t=28891
Well the entire thing is a monumental waste of money. All this talk about it regenerating East London. Ever been there? It sucks - always will. And the security involved is just ridiculous. Naturally the event is an accident waiting to happen and of course an obvious target for AlQaida. Still, never mind eh?
You missed it all..... OP sort of got it. Dead people are useless, they're not subjects-nobody is going to kill anyone, they just kill enough to keep the fear up in ya'. It's all about power, the ability for greater social control. That second article is very good, and down to earth. The olympics are used to show off internationally, and it's a peer pressure thing about who lives in the area, and how locked down it is.
I sincerely hope not, London is my home, whether i like that or not, for now it is. Anyway I believe something will happen and for that reason, I'm outta here!
to which "these people" are we referring? sounds like yet another attempt to drum up prejudice for some ulterior political reason to me. and if such a thing does happen, dollars to doughnuts, it won't be any "these people" who masterminded it, though they may be sub contracted, as with 9-11, to carry it out.
Okay, if there's no bomb at the Olympics will you people finally kindly shut the FUCK up about the Illuminati, NWO and all that conspiracy bullshit? Forever? That would be much appreciated, thankyou.
I really think there is TOO MUCH ATTENTION about this on the olympics thankfully and I DOUBT THEY WOULD DO ANYTHING! (It would be way too obvious)
Sorry, Walsh, no can do....so now that your question has been answered will you kindly shut the fuck up...thanks
Maybe there was a biological agent, like a flu virus, in the stands... People will start dying after they get home... Could be like Steven King's The Stand in about a month.
It's nothing to do with the attention, Dude. Causing explosions uses resources, and terrorists only use their resources to get what they want if they can't get it in any other way. Stirring up lots of talk about possible attacks, causes politicians to go into knee-jerk reaction mode. They start wasting our money on huge "security" operations, start taking away our civil liberties, causing peopel to get the wind up by siting anti-aircraft missiles on their roofs (that one went to court!!) and mooring HMS Ocean at Greenwich ... ... and the result is, peopel spend ages in a state of fear and panic, which is exactly the result the terrorists wanted to cause! And they've done it all without causing a single explosion, or using any of their resources. When we've all stopped panicking, and they can't stir up a fresh panic by words alone, THEN they might blow something up again. But it'll be something you never IMAGINED they would attack ... and they'll do it in a way you could never have foreseen (hands up everyone who foresaw the use of hi-jacked airliners as suicide missiles to bring down the Twin Towers???) This will cause a period of fear and uncertainty ... which will then be compounded by the politicians' knee-jerk reaction of seeing a risk of repeat attacks of the same kind round every corner. Of course, there will be no repeat attacks of the same kind - why would they bother? The politicians will create FAR more fear by acting as though there is an imminent risk of the same than the terrorists ever could be actually launching a repeat attack. So they'll save their resources, wait until the panic (eventually) dies down. And then come up with somethign else. Meanwhile, civilised life as we know it will be gradually eroded and whittled away, and outr existence will become progressively less pleasant ... and the politicians will slap one another on teh back and congratulate themselves over what a good job they're doing defending us against "the threat of terrorism".