My old man told me once not to come home until I defended myself, same with defending my sister once. He never taught me to be macho or coddle women, he taught me to be a man that can take care of my business. I'm very grateful for the ethics he instilled in me, self reliance and hard work. He's a self made successful man. My mother is a self proclaimed feminist such as yourself. Feminism is a joke. It's pushed forward by weak, dependent women that are insecure about their natural roles as women and so they blame everything on society at large. Of course women should be allowed to vote, work, and think independently, but you will never be equal with men in the sense you are aiming because at some point all of you look to a man for security or being taken care of in other ways. It's like the butch lesbian paradigm, they are trying to be manly but just end up angry and bitter because they are still women. And on that note, men need women. It's a natural symbiotic relationship put into place by evolution or god or whatever it may be. You cannot intellectualize your way out of this relationship using your very much female thought patterns, or any other thought patterns. Many households are matriarchal that I've been around.
Also, I do agree that boys are allowed more and more to treat girls like boys, and girls aren't expected to act like girls. I wonder if there's a correlation between that and the fact that in my age group women are viewed like whores and just a piece of pussy, and the women think they are empowered by opening their legs to guys like this and getting fucked then blown off because "they got theirs"? Ive been on both sides of this spectrum as a male, loved a female very much and been left for guys like that for whatever reason. And I've been one of those guys attempting to fuck my way to salvation. My personal thoughts are this society is deeply fucked at least for those of us that think. There's a rift and I think a lot of it is people trying to go out of gender roles because they think society placed these roles on them and put them in a box. And I don't think it should be like the 1950s but this woman empowerment stuff is actually hurting the women more than the men. And it's hurting us and turning us into monsters.
Yes. For example, at the age of 10, a girl will usually be bigger, stronger, and more vicious than a boy her age. That is in the age range when girls usually physically-brutalize and degrade boys. I feel like punishing these girls severely for the way they mistreat boys. Also, yes. Unfortunately, men will usually treat girl-children better than boy-children due to evil societal norms. This chic was a girl, not a woman. There is a difference. Women are good, girls are bad. I'm very sorry to hear about this bullying you suffered. Those girls are wimps for picking on boys. Any girl who bullies a boy is a coward, because boys are weaker than girls.
Yes. A boy hitting a girl in your time, would be severely-mistreated by society. Now, thanks to an increase in feminism and matriarchy, he would be treated leniently in comparison. I see nothing wrong with a boy being unmasculine, effeminate, soft, weak, passive, emotional and sensitive. Also, I see nothing wrong with him crying, giggling, whining, hitting girls, harassing girls. It's wrong for for male of any age to physically-injure or invade the personal space of grown women. However, there is nothing wrong with a boy venting his anger on a girl. She is stronger than him, so she should simply walk away. She should never hit him back nor should she complain, she should just "take it like a girl".
Hmmmm, a dont think its really clicked with you what that all encompasses. You use words like 'usually' and 'average'. But there is also the fringe, what happens in 1,2,5 % of the time. I'm not just talking about the physical, mental or emotional. But there is also the sexual. Bullying means one thing, which starts from many reasons. Degrading means something diferent, and at its most pronounced means something no one ever talks about. Because in the end if the perp is a 13 year old girl, the victim an 8 year old boy. That perp still has to be protected from older males (and females) from her true nature. Cos she is still an underage girl Again, those evil girls, not only does it not change, they just get worse as they get older. All that changes is they become far better acting good in front of most. In that 6 to 12 age range the big differences are about size and development as you've said, but also with sex. Girls just for the most part develop early and are switched on to that earlier. Boys that age, yes most are staring at boobies, but the wires havent been plugged in and they havent gotten that big surge of testosterone. So this is when they are at their most vulnerable, girls their age are still the same size or bigger , older girls are bigger, and the girls are switched on to concepts about sex earlier, hit puberty earlier. Its not just about wimpy boys, it can be the biggest guy in the grade, noticeably bigger than any guy his age, already muscly, but at like 8 yrs old totally dumb as to why the babysitter wants to play doctors and nurses, or girls his age in the cubby house when no one else is watching do. Girls are still stupid and his bits dont work yet. Then there is the whole attention and vanity thing, making up stuff so an older boy can come in as the white knight, trying to get two boys to fight each other over her etc, which can turn into dozens and dozens of stupid fights over some chic he may not really event want to know So Women are good, girls are bad? Not all woman. And in those cases furthest away from the norm and the guys just get a gutful, grow up to end up either allergic to vagina or one of those straight alpha male jerks that treat women like crap. Where does that all start? How much does it end up effecting everyone else, all initially started by the behaviour of 13 year old , what are really, alpha females And then in adult life you've got everyone else feeding you this: all men are pigs, all women are victims nonsense So what is this thread really about? You say you are hesitant about breeding cos of what happened to your little brother. Do you know everything that happened? Are you sure? Do you know how many times it happened? Are you sure? Likely he may have mentioned once to you and your mom, and you freaked out, made you both upset, so likely he'd protect both of you from then on Is it something that only happened to him at 8 then never again. I can pretty much guarantee 100% thats not the case Hesitant about breeding just because of you brother? Its at least in part becuase you know how totally full of shit some girls, some woman are? Even though you are running around saying things like all Women are good Does you little brother believe that? That would make him 25 now right?, and whats his deal. Is he still a Bachelor living with his well dressed "flatmate". Or have there been a string of girlfriends, girls your age labelling him a pig even though all those girlfriends only really wanted him for sex, never thought they'd be able to hang on to him cos they know what girls are really like. Again, what is this thread REALLY about?
there are too many humans in this world to be responsible to want to bring more then one more into it. if half the people in the world caused no more then one child, and the other half caused none, in a hundred years there would still be more of then there needs to be. maybe in about two or three hundred years of that our numbers would be just right. if it doesn't happen that way there's going to be one gohd awful time of starvation and disease, that will result in reducing population quite a bit more painfully. my parents caused only me, and i'm pretty sure, i haven't caused any. not completely. there was only one mate i lost touch with too soon after the last time we had sex to be completely certain.
Using that logic, a 13-year-old boy should be allowed to mistreat an 8-year-old girl without facing any social or legal condemnation. I disagree. I've actually spoken with a woman who used to bully boys when she was a young girl. Now she feels very guilty. This "white knight" is just as evil as the girl he defends. Mostly. and I am. No. I agree with you. Yes to both. I don't ask my brother about his personal beliefs but from what I know, he is single.
This thread is so oversensitive that it's almost funny. Your little brother had a bad experience when he was eight years old! Does he still agonize over it? Shit, I never got beaten up as a kid, but worse things than that happened to me and I'm fine. You can't expect everything to be warm and fuzzy all the time; all the 17-year-old did was threaten him. This happened 17 years ago, if my math is right. Forget about it. But you obviously can't, which tells me that you have an extreme hypersensitivity to suffering; probably to your own as well, but certainly that of little boys who remind you of your brother, whose one uncomfortable encounter you haven't gotten over in 17 years. You say you're unwilling to have children because you never want them to experience the smallest amount of discomfort -- ever. Unless there's something more you're not saying, this is pretty sick. Children need to have a few challenges, a few hard times ("a few" is modern, and it's warm and fuzzy enough); "what doesn't kill you makes you stronger." You shouldn't have children, because you would probably end up raising them to be even more sensitive than you are yourself. Things tend to go that way.
After seeing all the flip-flopping in this thread, I realize now that my original post didn't make sense. but I'm going to leave it there for moral purposes.
I dont think it has much to do with her little brother. Likely the penny has dropped on a few matters over the last couple years, but as usual wont say it directly, just in that round about way, so it all ends up sounding a little whack