New Zealand 'Revolutionary' legal high law means state regulated drug market

Discussion in 'Synthetic Drugs' started by SuperPsychMe, Jul 28, 2012.

  1. SuperPsychMe

    SuperPsychMe Member

    Messages:
    859
    Likes Received:
    17
    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10822749

    I think this is a huge step in the right direction. Please discuss :sunny:
     
  2. Jbones

    Jbones Member

    Messages:
    79
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hopefully that means high quality product for New Zealanders. Let's hope we could get so lucky in the US. Alcohol is significantly more dangerous than than most drugs in my opinion, makes people violent and idiotic, yet legal. Gimme MDMA any day
     
  3. FlyingFly

    FlyingFly Dickens

    Messages:
    2,101
    Likes Received:
    8
    Fuck yes, New Zealand! They made first step, hopefully we will see more countries going down this path soon.
     
  4. Mr.Writer

    Mr.Writer Senior Member

    Messages:
    14,286
    Likes Received:
    644
    This is very good news! Let's see how it works out for them.
     
  5. absentwithin

    absentwithin Member

    Messages:
    407
    Likes Received:
    0
    Awesome info! New to HF but in no way am I new if you catch my drift. This will be a testing ground for sure i hope NZ can pull it off without to many other countries trying to shut them down. Peace
     
  6. SuperPsychMe

    SuperPsychMe Member

    Messages:
    859
    Likes Received:
    17
    I really hope they can pull if off efficiently. They are the trail blazers for a legal drug market and will probably continue to be. Hopefully other countries will soon follow suit
     
  7. colton?s

    colton?s Guest

    Messages:
    9
    Likes Received:
    1
    This is bad a$$ now the us just has to catch onto this
     
  8. nynex

    nynex Member

    Messages:
    48
    Likes Received:
    1
    So let me get this straight

    Developing experimental chemicals that mimic THC, spraying these chemicals onto herbs and selling them to people with no information on long term health effects = OK

    Harvesting a THC containing plant that grows naturally = BAD
     
  9. eatlysergicacid

    eatlysergicacid Creep in a T-Shirt

    Messages:
    1,762
    Likes Received:
    4
    I think the point is to allow the people selling these things to market them as what they are and to require that they identify what chemicals they're selling. It's the right step for rc's and for all drugs if they can continue in that direction successfully. The point is that synthetic blends exist, and as long as they're sold as not for human consumption, they can't identify what chemicals they're selling so people can't really use them safely.
     
  10. Mr.Writer

    Mr.Writer Senior Member

    Messages:
    14,286
    Likes Received:
    644
    Remember that the law is all about precedents. So first little baby steps count a whole lot.
     
  11. DrummingJoey

    DrummingJoey Member

    Messages:
    481
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ugh spice products freak me out anyway. What they should do is legalize weed, psychs, and that's it. The rest of drugs is a scary world, especially RC's. Not to say that RC's are all always bad, but they are replacements, which means they are "runner-up" drugs that likely wouldn't be used if they were illegal.
     
  12. Mr.Writer

    Mr.Writer Senior Member

    Messages:
    14,286
    Likes Received:
    644
    lol they are not replacements dude . . . you don't understand the concept of research chemicals. it doesn't make sense to say that methylone is a replacement to MDMA because methylone is an RC, for a few reasons. One, many people prefer methylone to MDMA, so just because something is newer doesn't mean it's not as good as the classics. Second, even LSD, MDMA, and mushrooms have research going on with them (actual research, unlike methylone), so all those are still "research chemicals". Lastly, there are illegal RCs such as 2C-B, which is one of the most amazing psychedelics and is very sought after by anybody who knows anything about psychedelics.

    Don't lump all chemicals together and don't judge a chemical just because it wasn't done in the 60s ;)

    "RC" really just means that it was invented in the last 20 or less years. It's actually quite a meaningless term.
     
  13. eatlysergicacid

    eatlysergicacid Creep in a T-Shirt

    Messages:
    1,762
    Likes Received:
    4
    Prohibition is prohibition is prohibition. Arguing over which drugs should be prohibited is useless when the truth of the matter is that no prohibition works in the first place. Sure, make weed and LSD legal so that they can be produced, distributed, and consumed safely, but then you still have all your illegal meth labs, and all your dealers cutting their coke or heroin and selling them in generally unsafe ways. The fact of the matter is that drugs are worse because they're sold on the black market, and they're no less available because it.
     
  14. Colimon

    Colimon Cheesus Christo

    Messages:
    2,202
    Likes Received:
    16
    Very true! This idea may not be perfect at first, but it's a step in the right direction. Portugal had promising results from decriminalizing common illicit substances back in 2001 to help people instead of jail them. It's the same deal with decriminalizing escorting, it eliminates a lot of the STDS, and illegal sketchiness associated with the profession.
     
  15. Hedgeclipper

    Hedgeclipper Qiluprneeels Nixw

    Messages:
    2,010
    Likes Received:
    42
    I often see news-related posts hereabouts, but they're usually bad news, bans, etc. It's great to see some good news for a change! :)
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice