What will happen if poor people "punish" society?

The following tragedy is purely-hypothetical and fictional:

An individual is born into a poor family. He is hard-working and respects right from wrong. He is treated very badly by society because he has little money. His personality is innately very compassionate. Due to mistreatment from society [due to his lack of money], he feels driven to suicide. He feels society is treating him like garbage. His life is miserable.

Because he is going to commit suicide, he feels he has nothing to lose by "punishing" society prior to "offing" himself.

He retaliates against society by executing as many minor-girls [girls below 18] as time will allow. He does NOT torture or sexually-abuse those girls, he just kills them in a rapid and painless manner.

After his revenge on society, he euthanizes himself.

The girls he killed are totally innocent of any wrongdoing towards him. So why does he kill them? Here is why:

He feels that the same society that torments poor & hard-working people is the same society that has a soft spot for minor girls. He feels that the only way to hit society where it hurts, is to harm minor girls.

When a minor girl [of any socioeconomic status] is mistreated or killed by an older man [of any socioeconomic status], the public gets very angry.

Knowing this, the guy wants to offend society as much as possible while causing the least amount of suffering to its individuals. This is why he executes so many minor girls before his suicide. Do remember, he executes the girls in a rapid manner that does not cause them any pain.

To make matters worse, other poor people who identify with his horrible situation, start turning into copycats. As more impoverished individuals commit suicide, they also take as many minor-girls with them as possible [including their own daughters and sisters!]. More and more poor people retaliate against society because of the mistreatment they receive from society. This retaliation against society eventually starts to occur in every part of the world. This become a global crisis.

How would society and the law respond to this worldwide epidemic of suicide and homicide that takes place in the ghettos? Innocent girls are being killed by their own suicidal fathers and brothers. Something has to be done.

Here is my guess at to what would happen:

There would be massive public outcry for one thing, and the media would report heavily on the issue. There would be widespread condemnation from most parts of society.

But there is one persistent issue:

How do you punish a crime if the perpetrator intentionally dies in the process of committing the crime AND other people in his situation become his copycats? Eventually, society's only choice would be to cater to the needs of the poor without expecting anything in return. Right? Otherwise, there would be endless copycating and human civilization would end.

You can't punish a criminal after he is already dead.

One can assume the rich wouldn't care but the fact that older males are murdering girl-children cause society to get so upset that immediate action takes place in a desperate attempt to keep future girls safe.

Even rich people would be outraged that male humans are killing young girls -- regardless of the socioeconomic statuses of the girls or the men killing the girls.

Also, even the baddest of bad guys would be furious about the death of the girls.

As evil as society is, it really does care about minor-girls. In prison, any man who is in for harming a girl-child -- in any manner -- will face extreme anger from other inmates. As such, he would need to be in protective-custody for his own safety.

In all fairness, however, I hold society responsible for this act of revenge. The guys killing the girls do so because society bullies them to the point where they have nothing to lose. I actually feel sorry for these impoverished individuals. Society corrupted these individuals by failing assist them. As for the murdered girls, oh well, what a pity. If society simply gave the poor what they need, then such a tragedy would be prevented.

For those of you who would like to say "I owe no one a thing", I'm pretty sure you would go back on that sentence if you realized a girl's life could be saved.

Besides, if most of the impoverished population vanished [due to this homicide and suicide], who would do the jobs normally assigned to them. I can't think of any formerly-upper-class individual who would ever allow himself to make a living by "cleaning toilets".

 

Umm don't talk like this. There have been so many shootings and random acts of violence, and it's stupid and unnessisary.

 

I still think the poor people deserve their fair share of resources. I'm glad not to be impoverished but I still feel sorry for those who are.

If society is as civilized as it claims to be, it will treat the destitute with as much respect and sympathy as it treats the wealthy.

 

You sound disturbed. If someone would insist on punishing society because that person has a problem with wealth and not with his sexual frustrations why not take it out on bank directors and follow the eat the rich principle instead of murdering girls. The reaction of the masses would be righteous and understandable either way. Punishing society by killing individuals just because they're part of the society you have a problem with is insane and you will be judged as so.

 

"Sexual frustations"? WTF? What does this have to do with sexuality?

 

How much do you make a year OP?

 

It's confidential

 

I would think that the "poor person" in your story would have more issues with women than money. It seems he sees them as objects to destroy to send his message rather than fellow humans.

 

Wow.

Erm, please don't do this.
That's fucked up.

 

I thought this thread was closed. Your post is disturbing. Only a disturbed mind would think killing young girls is justifiable when one is in poverty. There is no logic there whatsoever. It's sick, especially given the string of mass shootings lately.

 

OP have you ever been diagnosed a Sociopath?


Hotwater

 

It sound like you are talking,hypothetically,about a very oppressed individual who feels so insecure that he feels compelled to kill young children.This is a well known phenomenon in animals.If you attack a a new mother it can feel so insecure about itself and it's babies that it may well kill it's babies itself.What we need to do is create a society where no one feels that way.That means removing ontological insecurity,and providing a good standard of living for everyone with access to good healthcare.Witness,if you will,rebel and Government partisans using children as human shields in the conflict in Syria.Also child-sacrifice in the Mayan and Aztec cultures to appease an angry God.I think perhaps what the opening poster is trying to point out,if we can read between the horror of what he is suggesting,is the hypocrisy of human values.We all sign up to caring about children,but in the Real World scores of thousands of children die every day thorough malnutrition and lack of basic healthcare with very little comment,making a mockery of all supposed civilized human values.It's One World,believe it or not.

 

That "disturbed mind" is a result of society's irrational rules.

Besides, I have the right to express myself so long as I'm not making "criminal threats".

I live in the USA where there is something called "free speech". I can write whatever I want on the internet as long as I'm not threatening anyone.

It is perfectly-legal for me to express my wishes for harm to occur to someone. It is NOT legal for me to cause such harm or *even* threaten to cause that harm.

As far as the 1st amendment is concerned, there is a *significant* difference between expressing a wish for harm to occur to someone and THREATENING to cause such harm.

It is your right to say "I hope you die". However, it is illegal to say "I'm going to kill you".

As long as my messages don't involve any criminal-threats, no one can legally get their hands on me.

 

Seriously, I'm one of the few non-sociopathic individuals in a society made mostly of sociopaths.

 

Thanks for trying to get other readers to understand my story.

 

I thought the same when you focussed the punishment on teenage girls. So let me ask for discussion's sake what DO THEY have to do with this persons problems?

 

(to post 13)That may well be true,but your example makes us wonder about your motivations. I read your other post also. Do you have a problem with females--especially young ones??

 

The impoverished individual in my story could care less about sexuality. He is upset because society isn't catering to his BASIC needs, such as healthcare.

Besides, most men have absolutely no sexual interest children of any gender. The majority of men prefer women who are fully-developed. I prefer women who at at least around 31 years of age or older. There are a few monsters here and there [pedophiles] who give the entire adult age group of males a bad name.

 

No. What I DO have a problem with, is poor people not getting their most rudimentary necessities taken care of -- such as medical care.

 

So do I concerning medical care. Single payer is needed. Just odd the way you framed your position.