how ridiculous you sound with that pompous lawyer-geek talk strange I wonder why it works in court? You really have no idea of the difference between fact and fiction Do tell! The "basis" is that things are as they appear. Of course they are! The video is evidence of that Of course it is! If you have evidence to the contrary, provide it. If you have facts to the contrary provide it. I have suggested several lines of inqurey that you could pursue to investigate its suitability as evidence, but you conveniently chose to change the subject. That is dishonest. conjecture and red herrings are not suitable evidence. want to go for best 4 out of 5 maybe?
I will always believe that it was orchestrated by little bush. Hope he ends up in court someday. What a POS.
Yes, was not an inside job. I have read every conspiracy theory on it because I found it fairly compelling fiction. But none of the fact the truthers have hold up to any sort of scrutiny. And when presented with conflicting information, they simply deny the information which back up their narrative. Trying to present facts to a person who believes that the two towers weren't brought down by planes, is as pointless as trying to present evidence that the world is 4 billion years old to a new earth creationist. I on the other hand, have no dog in this fight, could be convinced that it was a government plot, and simply don't because the truther evidence isn't good.
Lode, everything in your post is exactly what I think, too. Except that I would replace the word "truther" with "official-liner.
Official-liners will be happy to know that no evidence of explosives was found at the scene of the crime. However, they will not be happy to learn that the reason nothing was found is because NIST did not test for explosives. When asked why they did not test for explosives, NIST said, "Why look for something that isn't there?"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FBvGzaHUc-s&sns=em"]charley says dont disturb mum and the milkman - YouTube
sounds like a typical government lie. Of course an explosive is not there after it explodes! Some people actually have the misconception that the government works for the people in america.
If people wanted to argue things which are theoretical, like that the government knew about it and didn't act, I shy away from those because it's more a hypothetical than factual argument, and it is possible. But that's a building which has windows blowing out from the thousands of tons of building falling down on it. Not a compelling argument. The towers were hit by planes, and planes brought them down.
I'm not intimately familiar. He's a 9/11 hero who believes that the government had prior knowledge correct?
Movie with Martin Sheen & Woody Harrelson coming soon about 911 truth movement: http://gothamist.com/2012/10/21/finally_a_911_truther_movie_starrin.php Movie website: http://septembermornmovie.com/