Do people still believe 911 wasnt a inside job?

but then thats the official "story" for you! The weaker they get the stronger they are! LOL




hehe




the wtc is the only building ever to "collapse" into its own footprint.

OOPS!

lol

 

Damn it, Keith, I'm going to try one more time. The only way that a dynamic load is not slowed down by a static load is if the static load were moving just as fast as the coming dynamic load. But then the static load wouldn't be a static load now would it?

The towers' floors and core structures were static loads. They were not traveling as fast as the dynamic load coming toward them; they weren't traveling at any speed.

 

Who is disputing that?

The rolling building is funny - but where the is 'damage. Is it near the top? in the middle or at the bottom? Then compare were the damage was on both the TT's.

 

whats the difference?

 

If the building above was 'damaged' further up it would not have rolled over.
Use some of that critical thinking you think you have.

 

Your clip missed out where they failed.

 

well that happens when you apply force and the fulcrum is off center.




see?

 

they didnt, take out the core and the exo has to fold and follow.

demolition 101 no?

 

he does not understand that this is what should have happened. rewriting physics notwithstanding that is. lol



according to kieth that should have collapsed

 

Yeah, and can you imagine if there was a verticle core also?

 

Nope.

Even if he removed one of the sides of the 'floor' he drops the other 'floors' on?
This is more likely

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dUikmLufHrs&feature=related"]WTC2 collapse simulation - YouTube

 

Something that you totally lack.

 

You've got a 25 floor mass landing on one floor. Yeah the upper moving part will slow down slightly, but the static floor will accelerate much more. Roughly 25 times as much. And the falling mass, heavier by one floor, then has another 3 meters to accelerate before doing the same to the floor below.

Your argument that the columns below will be able to resist this is insane. Calculate the impact force. Then compare it to the strength of the columns. There is no possible way that a 5-G rated column can support a multi-hundred G impact. It will shatter, snap, bend, whatever, but it will not continue to stand.

 

Wrong, fool.

 

i think we can safely conclude that some still believe it wasn't an inside job, whilst there are others who believe it was... personally, the evidence so far, combined with my intuition, leads me to believe it was an inside job, and i have neither seen nor heard anything to date, convincing enough to change my view on this...

 

Your link does not work anymore.

 

They got rid of Saddam. He ws flooding the market. Keeping prices low and monopolies not in control.

If #7 was a CIA headquarters then explosives would have already been planted in case they needed the building destroyes ASAP. Govt. agancies, especially secret agancies think and plan for every possible scenerio.

Yeap, Bush didnt even know when the war was suppossed to end. Remember the "Mission Accomplished" photo op on the Navy ship? "They" werent going to let him end the war that easy. I always felt Bush was not in control of the country.

 

I've heard that. I still don't get it.

 

yeh thats how demolitions are done alright.

simultaneous removal of supporting columns and then all that weight is free to fall without resistance.

and of course everyone buys you drinks for your brilliant engineering to get it to fall in its own foot print.

Its a real bitch to do with pryo, so how did that work with a plane again in the governments fantasy?






you know ALL those columns that in order to get it to fall straight down with nothing left standing had to be taken out all at the same time.

wait I know:

 

That banner wasn't talking about an end to the war.