Do people still believe 911 wasnt a inside job?

SO YOU WANT EVERYONE TO ARGUE AGAINST SOME GHOST NAMED OTHERS? OOPS LOL

I dont put any stock what so ever in someones imagination. how about an expert or at least you opinion.

yeh there was a kid on the ground videoing and near got clocked by a piece of it.

fact remains that is a long tube shape as can be seen in 3d, your argument has no grounds what so ever unless that is taken into account.

Not to forget those mysterious brilliant whiate magnesium looking glowee thingees that its covering up

its great to have an opinion n all but there comes a point you need to back it up.



explain the physics behind your 20+ ft wide CYLINDRICAL dust TUBE that is over 50 foot long.

Will I die of old age before you answer that?

Oh and btw dont forget it had to go through what amounts to an egg slicer to get out of the building and maintain that "PERFECT" symetry in 3d

 

me? bbs 150 baud LMAO

 

the problem is this stuff really does work.

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”

 

No.

I gave my opinion. You only listen to expert opinion when it suites you.

Oh, right, they are "brilliant white magnesium looking glowee thingees" now?
I actually can't remember what the hell you are talking about - so perhaps post some footage so we are on the same page with regards to that.

If you can find footage that shows the exit wound of WTC 2 before/during and after - you might find that there is nothing to argue over.
If this 20ft cylindrical object - that is supposedly 50ft long - was still there....then we would see it, obviously.
If the impact occurred, the dust settled, and nothing like that remained - what precisely have we to argue about?
It would seem it was just smoke/dust and fire - possibly a segment of the plane that came off, possibly fragments of the cladding - maybe not.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TVk4nh-hBKY"]Rab C Nesbitt meets Spanish equivalent - YouTube

Scorch and Zzap on holiday.

 

you still have not explained and I wxpect you never will explain how "dust" can hold symitry over 50 feet lol

I am not getting any younger



see the really brilliant white thingie ma jiggiees? I mean like I am 1/2 blind and I can see them


see when jet fuel bursts into flames



or even semtek or many other materials they have a bright orange yello color



but the wtc had brilliant white color.




odd huh

 

And I've asked Odon to offer his opinion as to what the white flashes in the building were just before the wing actually hits the building. I'm still waiting for his reply.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U5RTCBYc8XI"]I Love My Government - Great new Bodyscanners! - YouTube

 

you mean the one before the wing even hits the building?

 

How are you working that out?

Oh, right. That's what can happen when a plane hits a building of that type.

Explains a lot.

There was plenty of that - if you move past the 3 seconds after impact.


Btw, I'm not going to go back over your old posts where you have pretty much changed everything you have posted.

 

I've asked a few questions, too. Still waiting for a reply.

 

ok so you agree then that it was not jet fuel since jet fuel burns yellow orage instantly in the first microsecond forward.

so then what material are those explosives? I can only think of a few that burn brillant white.

thats really a neat picture but you apparently have no clue what is being talked about here.

no I only edited out what you made an issue over, and stated that I corrected it do you have a problem with that?

 

see now demolitions blow the buildings from the inside and the smoke and debris fly through windows and holes to the outside,

www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Q9I68y7rO0"]Implosionworld Explosive Demolition Compilation - YouTube

get this EXACTLY like a plane would do if it exploded inside a building.

Now You can see hundreds or even thousands of exposions exhausting smoke and debris out windows and what not but NONE of them look like a cylinder.

So why would anyone in even 1/2 their right mind believe you or even take you seriously?

Oh and some of those demolitions have some "really" white explosion.

 

Eh? I said skip on past the first 3 seconds and tell me what you see. The ground impact isn't comparable and the building e.g is empty and sped up slightly. Post the first 3 seconds of that will you - at normal speed.

I do. I worked it out to be about 33ft.

Yes. If you have an issue you wish to correct - start a new post and explain what you have altered and why. Thanks.

 

Post a clip where a 767 aeroplane hits a building - at speed - that isn't empty.

 

I take that back - at half speed.

 

Yeah, that flash of light coming from inside the building just a little above the wing even though the wing has yet to touch the outer wall. That's the one he hasn't gavde his opinion of.

 

Yes, obviously, that is a vital piece of the puzzle that we must scrutinise.

 

No, Odon, for the umpteenth time, I'm not going to let you turn this thread into an examination of theories as to how the towers were brought down. I'm arguing the facts that point to a controlled demolition--I mean besides the fact that they all just really, really look like controlled demolitions.

Things like white flashes inside buildings just before plane contact; flashes that we shall refer to from here on out as Britney Flashes.

 

Come on, Odon! White flashes coming from inside the tower before its struck by the plane. Was it a variatiion of ball-lightning? Maybe tower lightning?