Do people still believe 911 wasnt a inside job?

Doesn't matter what building. I stand by my point that if there were anything in that building that would have hindered the collapse, it was neutralized.

 

Your point was: "It's because its core had been neutralized."

Ok, anything within WTC 1 2 and 7 that would have hindered the collapse, it was neutralised.

Yeah, we agree.

Cuz, you know, that's how demolition works.

 

Exactly!

 

sarcasm
A tongue of which the user speaks of something the complete opposite of what the user means. It often has the best comedic value.

Ex. 1: "I'm okay. Don't mind the gaping wound and the sword protruding from my back. I'm fine. Feel like a million fucking bucks, dammit."

Ex. 2:
"Is your car stuck in the mud?"
"No, no, of course not. I'm only practicing how to spray mud using my tires.

Jackass."

 

It isn't really necessary to sign your post there at the bottom. I'm well aware of who I'm conversing with.

 

:smilielol5: :frown:

 

The main reason of 9/11 terract is to begin the war in Iraq. George Busch Jr. is a real villain!

 

getting a population to back a war is a lot easier than you think, all you need is a good PR firm. killing a shitload of your own citizens is somewhat unnecessary...

 

Agreed they could have justified the war anyway and nobody could have stopped it. But that would not have created the nationalistic fervor that occurred in the wake of 9/11. This country is still operating under the notion that there are "real Americans" amongst us. I'm not saying it was an inside job or not, but there's no doubt that it created blind nationalism in this country, and that people who question the government in the war on terror are completely ostracized. Which I don't think would be the case if not for 9/11.

 

Seriously - I think it has been 50 - 50 all along. You can make the argument either way. I really don't think 911 happened and there was a massive swing.

 

to an outsider, america always seems to be a lot more comfortable with patriotism, nationalism and support for the military (and drawing parallels between these) than European countries are, that sort of thing tends not to sit so well with us over here, particularly in England. but possibly that's just the obscured view of the spectator.

either way, i still reckon there are simpler ways of instigating a nationalistic fervor and support for a war, which don't involve murdering your own citizens in large numbers, with the massive risk of etting caught thrown into the bargain.

"you provide the pictures, i'll provide the war" as william randolph hearst said

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G43zl4fzDQg"]Extreme Prejudice - CIA Whistle Blower Susan Lindauer PDX 911Truth - YouTube


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yTbdnNgqfs8"]TalkingStickTV - John Perkins - Confessions of an Economic Hit Man - Part I - YouTube

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SAIdfhwZ4MU"]Obama-Pledges-His-Allegiance-to-Her-Majesty-the-Queen - YouTube

 

I posted some questions about this woman earlier.

He and Susan have a few things in common: Both had books to sell, delusions of grandeur and not actually working for the agencies they associate themselves with.

Could you find the transcript of this video or Obama's speech, and highlight were he pledges allegiance to the Queen? Thanks.

 

I dont know that I am willing to put that kind of effort into it. Its common knowledge the queen back around 1997 made changes to the social security laws effecting american social security. The commentator was close enough in her description. Reaffirmation of the pledge has the same legal character as making an initial pledge.

Among some people its also common knowledge that the crown never relinquished the underlying titles to any claimed lands in the US and that the feudal system was merely given a face lift wth 99% of the same rules simply given different labels and applied right here right now today in america.

and of course you should knwo what america thinks of the queen right?


which of course is not the same as her lieges on their visit to grandmas house


because some people understand form 1069 of the irc.



Since american law does not allow a president to be given a title of nobility, the queen waited until he was out of offfice before promoting Clinton by knighting him.

So as you can see some americans are not so fond of the queen and living under the law of conquest. The same laws that are now being imposed upon iraq and Afghanistan by the imperialist empire under the guise of "democracy" and spreading "freedom".





Well the government had a war to sell and they dont actually work solely for the office they purport either so what your point?

 

I only asked for a transcript, and highlight were he pledges allegiance to the Queen.

really - what changes were they then?

I'm not sure if this is true - but I can imagine it might be true in some archaic manner. It does sound like one of those urban myths, though.

Knighted who? Obama? :smilielol5:

My point is - these people are delusional and have books to sell. .

 

clinton

of course you know or should know that archaic law IS still in effect today and NOT the same as abolished law unless you bought into modern day disinformation.

in fact rumor has it people are talking about abolishing these old aristocratic trusts that were and are used for one group of men to control another. democratically of course. just like americas rigged elections.

My point is believers in government are delusional since government has wars to sell and money to extort from its citizens and inhabitants for purposes to which they are not privy. Like paying off their international aristocratic pals
RICO

oh and again he did not take the pledge he reaffirmed the pledge

 

Oh, right, Clinton. I'm not sure about him I know a few ex-presidents have had honourary knighthoods.

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

 

I guess you mean by "modern day disinformation" you mean laws that make the archaic ones totally defunct, right? Just because they have not been officially stricken from the books - they obviously still are lawful. If you ever can be bothered to put some energy into this - perhaps post some proper information regarding this, Obama pledging allegiance and the changes in U.S SS. Thanks.

 

Odon, why are you calling John Perkins delusional?