Sterilization?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Awiseman, Dec 31, 2012.

  1. Awiseman

    Awiseman Member

    Messages:
    36
    Likes Received:
    1
    what do you guys think about forcing people who have disabling genetic disorders to be sterilized? or people who have had a kid with one of the disorders?
    on a very statistical, clinical level it does make sense to help rid humanity from these diseases but on an emotional and human level ots definitely a hot button issue.
    I have two cousins who are on disability and are unable to function because of illnesses that are genetic, and my aunt and uncle were told by a doctor not to have any more children because of this. it seems unfair to the kids to have to suffer with these issues but it is a right at least in the usa
     
  2. Baldassare Cossa

    Baldassare Cossa Guest

    Messages:
    15
    Likes Received:
    0
    If we consider where such a policy could lead - the answer would be forced sterilisation is a 'taboo' for the sake of the 'good' of humanity/society.

    It is a policy without sympathy, and where there is no sympathy there is no care, respectively there is no human attachment and the degradation of human rights becomes a slippery slope - as the definitions of 'dis-abled' for forced sterilisation can easily be extended.

    Bear something in mind, from a fiscal perspective to satisfy the monetarists and staticians, care is not simply a humanist and ethical matter - it actually creates markets that provide jobs and are highly profitable. So it is a statistical moot to force sterilisation from this perspective.

    On the issue of 'preserving the human race' from 'degeneration' - such people very rarely breed and when they do their own genes reach a nadir very quickly, such an organism [in this case a human] ceases to attract mates and its own body simply cannot compete with the environment or even maintain itself adequately [without care which bears costs, therefore creates jobs and profit opportunities].

    This means, even if we demand an economic perspective - an ethic of care often derided as 'socialist', is the best means. It ensures an ambient, ethical and caring society that profits from its own humanism, and avoids a politics and policies that can lead to consequences witnessed in Nazi Germany. Bear in mind, Nazi policy developed from eugenics which was a very British and American discourse as 'science'.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice