Will Obama be impeached?

http://planet.infowars.com/politics...-impeachment-proceedings-against-barack-obama

 

I doubt it will go anywhere.

 

It's all a big dog and pony show.

Should he be impeached? Fuck yes he should. But it's not like anything would change if someone else were in office. Regardless of which side of the spectrum a politician is on, they all represent the same agenda. Only the rhetoric really differs once you boil it all down, and the rhetoric is just that: rhetoric.

Politics are a joke. They are for the public to believe in and nothing more. Presidents don't determine shit and they have no real power other than figuratively.

So yeah, impeach Obama. Then what??

It's all noise and it means nothing. Nothing will come of this, and I doubt most people will even hear about it. Then again, this story is coming from Infowars, so it could be all bullshit anyway (not like there would be much more weight to it if CNN or FOX were reporting it).

 

This is what they do instead of governing. Hate politics.

 

Need more info.
Isn't somebody trying to get him impeached every other month?

 

From a Constitutional perspective, he should have been impeached his first week in office. Then again, the same could apply to the previous president as well, and probably several before that.

 

Why?

 

Because almost everything the guy has done since he's been in office has went against the Constitution. How many hundreds of examples do you need?

Ever heard of Operation Fast and Furious? That's probably the most glaring one of all. Meanwhile, Obama (scratch that -- his handlers) wants to usurp people's 2nd Amendment rights under that guise it will make us safer. Well fuck, I wonder how many people were killed from gun violence thanks to Fast and Furious.

 

what did he do in his first week that he should be impeached for?

 

Beat me to it

 

The health care/Obamacare thing is the first one that comes to mind.

 

Yes I have heard about that. I'm not quite sure how unconstitutional it was.
I'm not quite sure about the exact detail - so don't know why he should be impeached for it.

One of those fruitless conversations, I think.

 

Not great on detail are you

 

I'm generally pernickety because my general attitude is the same as this:
Pressed_Rat
"...if you actually read the report and not just the sensationalistic headline..."

You do tend to post sensationalistic headlines, and hardly if ever provide the report (as it were). I know people like your headlines, so you probably don't feel you need to provide the report. Maybe one doesn't exist - that's generally my theory. Hence me asking more than most. It's not aimed at picking on you. I'm like that with everybody. I think you know that.

 

Short answer: no.

NEXT......

 

Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal tells the GOP that they must stop being the STUPID PARTY. But the cons continue to expose themselves as a bunch of morons unfit to have any control of the government. They spent four years trying to smear Obama, and obstruct all his efforts to fix the mess that Shrub left him with.

After getting their asses kicked back in November, they still haven't learned the lesson. Not only did they lose the presidential election, but also lost seats in the House and Senate.

Everything the cons do, only draws attention to their bigotry, hate, pettiness and inability to fix the huge problems they themselves have created.

The cons claim to be fiscally responsible. But the last three republican presidents have added $11 trillion to the national debt, and have collapsed the economy with their stupid ideological policies of FUCK THE POOR & GIVE TO THE RICH, and their global domination quest, which has added another $4 trillion to the debt.

The majority of voters are now wise to the con game, THAT IS WHY THEY LOST IN NOVEMBER. And this stupid impeachment idea will only draw more attention to the STUPID PARTY.

The cons will lose control of the house in 2014. America is fed up with the cons dragging this country down.

 

What about Truman with Korea, Johnson and Nixon with Vietnam, H.W Bush with Somalia, and Bill Clinton with Kosovo? Executive doesn't even consider congress anymore, and only needs approval from the UN, as backwards as it is.

 

Maybe. But if so, so should most presidents the US has had. This is not a new thing.

And should most members of congress the US has ever had.

Anyways, I read "infowars" and realized this was not news.

Alex jones is a loud-mouthed bully who makes a business of spirited, intentionally sloppy, sensationalist "journalism". Nothing he says means one quarter of a fuck. Unfortionatly, when important issues come up, he's there to make sanity look totally flying-spittle-insane.

 

That article is fake actually. It was an internet tabloid. Fake, fake,fake. Please do the research before distributing more crap on the web. There's enough crap as there is.

 

Oh yeah! They're just hating on Obama for NO REASON at all!! (Esp not the unconstitutional war in Libya.) We all know Obama is perfect, and can do NOTHING wrong!! Anyone who contests him, is a racist, bigot, tinfoil hat-wearing, conspiracy theorist, hiding out in and underground bunker.

If people are hating on Obama for no reason, then people hated Bush for no reason. After all, what's a few unconstitutional laws, wars and, drone strikes on citizens, between us and our government?

If you ask me, people need to stop bitching, and/or contesting the U.S Government on ANYTHING!!!

That's right- everyone just STFU and blindly follow the herd... atriot: