How many internet forums have you been banned from? How many times?

Ive been banned from 4chan a few times cuz im such a badass

 

1 ... about 10 times..
i used to troll the FFR forums.. lol


but this was yeaaaarrsss ago..

 

Not a forum , but when I used windows (dream studio Linux now) and was on pal talk http://www.paltalk.com/ I would get in the woman only rooms , until they kicked me out .

 

I was banned from a parenting forum. Pregnant women and mums are so friggin sensitive, they can't handle slightest criticism and my god if you dare to disagree with them...

 

Ahem..... If Memory Serves Me Well, Just Recently You Were Banned

From "The Hip Forums" For About 2 Months....



Cheers Glen.

 

Just the hipforums, a while ago. It was one of Skip's hissy fits I guess, but if I can remember correctly it was for trolling someone..

 

My bans:-
1)freerepublic- for saying George Bush should be publicly executed.
I lasted 1 hr of trolling.

2)GuffPost (some call it Huffpost). banned for calling the owner a transexual, Polish-Muslim immigrant politically correct cocksucker.
Wow that is the worst "news" site ever - your posts are removed if you dont tow the bizarre party line.

3)A couple of hippy places- I cant rememner -maybe someone can remind me

4)Tripadvisor review rejected- think i got banned. After I said the owner shitted on my bed while I was out

I once went on a "royalty" fan site. Amazingly, I called them inbred baby eaters and stuff, (who should be gunned down mineshafts Soviet style), yet I NEVER got banned. (Maybe inbred babyeating is what they were all fans of).

5)Football websites- just for my club. Some of these really make me see the red mist.
Since we've had foreign owners, you often see their pr firms pretending to be fans, basically applauding the prices going up/star player being sold/ money being stolen from the fans.
Now many footie fans are addicts, they cant accept when they're being fucked up the arse, even if its obvious. It really makes me mad, so I rarely last longer than a month... So I probably only register for 1 month a year or so.

I suppose the net also makes me a bit pedantic about politics. In real life I just laugh and say they like being the prime minister's gimp or sthg like that, then leave it.

 

Well, it's not really not 'towing the party line' - It's being borderline offensive, and just plain rude It was probably the 'transexual' 'Polish-Muslim immigrant' - which unless you know are true, are just designed to be derogatory - as if there is something wrong with being any of those things. It's like you calling somebody a 'black shit head'. Why should people have that kinda stuff on their forum/website?

 

Well its not as if I was looking to become friends with him

But there is a serious pt. Broadcasters *should* be under an obligation to show fairness in their productions. Whereas Guffpost deliberately distorts news and commentary to fit their unsavoury agenda.

This is legal in the US(eg Fox) but ILlegal on British tv. Imagine an article, saying that 2million Romanian gypsies wont do any harm going into England, and won't cost any British jobs. Now 500 people might post comments and object. But 20 people might agree with it. If GuffPost removes the 500 objectors, and leaves the other 20, thats clearly distorting public opinion. And trying to hoodwink the public. This is what they do. And personally, I think it shouldn't be allowed for a company claiming to be a serious news provider. Especially when it is part of a huge group like AOL Time Warner.

Their agenda is also pretty disturbing in other areas, IMO.

 

IamnotaMan

Well, I'm not 100% sure who you are talking about.

It's true that newspapers or sites such as Huff post are not under the same regulations/remit etc as TV broadcasters.
I would say it is slightly different in the US as Fox is a cable news outlet.
I'm not going to bore myself with the finer details, though.
I would just presume they (Fox/Huff etc), like newspapers have no obligation to not be biased.
They are obviously under the same laws regarding defamation etc - but apart from that - they have no obligation to pander to your opinions.
If you don't like what you read - don't read it.
Go pick up the 'Morning Star' 'Socialist Worker' or something like that.

That is fair comment - though. Reasoned argument.
But the point is about saying: 'Transexual, Polish-Muslim immigrant politically correct cocksucker.' - which would probably get you banned where ever you said (I presume it wasn't just one comment, but a general tone).

 

It was one post. Guff Post is legendary for promoting a pro-immigration, anti British, pro-transwhateveritscalled agenda.

1stly the legislation is behind the times. 2nd, its particularly disturbing that a huge ISP is linking up with a such a reality distorting organisation.
3- I think companies should have to declare that their comments are grossly edited to produce a misrepresentation.

Even the print media has *some*obligations - altho not many at all.

BTW- Guffpost is outside of pure left-right politics. Immigration and transwhatevers adopting kids etc don't really fit left-right wing categorisations.

 

IamnotaMan

Legendary? hahaha. I dunno about that. Not sure. Sounds rather ott to me.
So, your're not the socialist worker type, more the Enoch Powell was right type?
So what if they are 'pro-immigration'?
What if they don't shudder at the thought of Angelina and Brad adopting some child outside the U.S?
I've never actually read an Anti-British piece on their website, perhaps you have an e.g?
Is it an advertisement to visit Disneyland Europe?
You don't seem particularly fair and balanced, so I understand why some news outlets irk you (I'm the same).

 

Other than being banned from these forums (multiple times, but always reinstated), I was banned from the Infowars forum a few years back. But if you even ask questions about Alex Jones you are banned from the site.

But I don't visit many forums at all. These days, these are the only forums I post on.

 

I was banned once from here, and once from a gay forum for a situation which escalated between myself, a main mod and a bunch of his supporters, over a discussion about God. It was seriously me and one other guy versus like a thousand atheist gays (or, scientism whores as I think of them, using civil rights and 'tolerance' to excuse a vacuous, promiscuous lifestyle in order to rid themselves of guilt). I can't tell you how many times I've heard gay people feel the need to bring up "emotional honesty" when their immunity to vain indulgence begins to crack. This remarkable phenomenon of group think largely caused by a total misapprehension of the purpose of the church as compared to the state by society at large was not what responsible for my being banned, nor was it ever brought up. I was banned for not being atheist in an atheist community be default, to the point that anything I said in the way of challenging their elementary philosophical arguments was considered a personal attack. Some of the mods supporters even called this out as unfair but I was removed without a trace and the topic deleted. I no longer partake in this kind of online discussion, at least not to that extent, but am always willing to learn and to share what I've discovered along the way.

 

I've yet to be banned, but I've had many of my posts deleted by mods to avoid flame wars. I also avoid the political threads as they become nasty quickly especially during an election year.

 

none so far, but I only just joined here, give me time

 

Well counting my recent "vacation" I think maybe 6-7 times here.
3 identity-bans, one "identity" only lasting 17 minutes, and a few "time-outs" LOL.

can't divulge details or I would most likely be asked to leave again, let's just say it was differences of opinion with "management".

I try to be good, honest I do.:angel: