Fukushima plume heading across Pacific to U.S. and Canada

Voyage · Sep 21, 2013

odonII said:

What about from 2000 to 2013? From 2005 there is 8 years worth of missing data. I see it as what is likely NOW or what has occurred recently (say in the last decade). If your data misses out 90% of what has occurred in the last decade then it might not suggest what is likely NOW.
Click to expand...

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20...inflated-double-counted-badly-organized.shtml

i dunno man, believe what you want, im sure your google works as good as mine, furthermore, i'm certain we can all pull up stats to sway the argument.
i just choose not to live in fear, i stopped believing there's a boogeyman under the bed.

Marifana said:

Instead of discussong Islam and Muslims. I choose to write about the topic.
Click to expand...

oh, ya.

The meltdown at Fukushima happened in 2011 and the waves from the tsunami brought radioactive material into the ocean. There were various other sources from the event which caused even more contamination. It was an unprecedented event for the ocean, so there is every right to be worried. It’s good to have a healthy amount of concern about radioactivity in the Pacific, but the effects from Fukushima on our coast have been exaggerated. Certainly, there was an extremely high level of radioactivity right at the site of the disaster. However, the further away you go, the lower those levels become and they reach a point of insignificance.

When you put milk in your coffee cup and start stirring, you see streaks at first and eventually it all becomes that light color. The ocean behaves in a similar fashion and the mixing is very well understood. The radioactive isotopes mix with the currents. Those currents slowly move across the Pacific and they will reach our shores. But the levels will be tens of thousands of times lower that what we found in Japan. They’re already low enough off the coast of Japan to be safe, but they’re going to be even lower off our coast.
Click to expand...

http://www.surfingmagazine.com/blogs/the-scoop-radioactive-pacific/

so no, not much to be scared of but feel free to keep being afraid of everything.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s-A5Ne3-Yq8
http://vimeo.com/66442400

odonII · Sep 21, 2013

Voyage said:

i dunno man, believe what you want, im sure your google works as good as mine, furthermore, i'm certain we can all pull up stats to sway the argument.
i just choose not to live in fear, i stopped believing there's a boogeyman under the bed.
Click to expand...

I don't keep myself awake at night worried about Islamic terrorism, and it is quite possibly true the terrorism I generally hear about is weighted toward Islamic terrorism (or perpetuated by Muslims). I wasn't aware there was so much 'terrorism' perpetuated by Latino's - but are Latino's likely to wish to fly a plane into a nuclear power facility (for the 'splendour'/prestige) any time soon? I do not think so. That is the issue we seem to be talking about.

http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/wanted_terrorists

Mostly Muslims!

I do accept the fact that 'terrorism' is a broad term and statistics are but statistics.

What my Google provided...

http://www.state.gov/j/ct/rls/crt/

Marifana · Sep 21, 2013

Why build a nuclear power plant - with all the risks it has in a country like Japan. Especially in though of where they are situated and their risks for tsunamis and eartquakes.

relaxxx · Sep 21, 2013

Voyage said:

So, here's a "fact".

Terrorist Attacks on U.S. Soil by Group, From 1980 to 2005, According to FBI Database
Click to expand...

LOL, 24% extreme LEFT wing groups?
And what's the body toll on these supposed LEFT extremists?
Can they even fill one floor of one WTC building?

What a biased load of republican fucktarded bullshit.

And these RIGHT wing terrorists didn't make it on your graph at all?

During the 1980s, more than 75 right-wing extremists were prosecuted in the United States for acts of terrorism, although they carried out only six attacks during the decade.[8] The success of law enforcement in capturing and preventing terrorists has been credited to their efforts to investigate terrorists before they turned to violence.[8] The April 19, 1995 attack on the Murrah federal building in Oklahoma, by the right-wing extremist Timothy McVeigh, which killed 168 people, would become the worst domestic terrorist attack in American history.[9] It was reported he had ties to a Michigan militia group.[10]

Eric Rudolph carried out a series of terrorist attacks between 1996 and 1998 including the Centennial Olympic Park bombing which claimed 2 lives and injured 111, the plan being to cancel the games, claiming they were set up to promote global socialism.[11] Rudolph has also confessed to the bombings of an abortion clinic in the Atlanta suburb of Sandy Springs on January 16, 1997; the Otherside Lounge of Atlanta lesbian bar on February 21, 1997, injuring five; and an abortion clinic in Birmingham, Alabama on January 29, 1998, killing Birmingham police officer and part-time clinic security guard Robert Sanderson, and critically injuring nurse Emily Lyons.

Right-wing extremists have committed at least eight lethal terrorist attacks in the United States that have resulted in the deaths of nine people since 9/11, according to data compiled by the New America Foundation. Another FBI study reported that between January 1, 2007, and October 31, 2009, white supremacists were involved in 53 acts of violence, 40 of which were assaults directed primarily at African-Americans, seven of which were murders and the rest of which were threats, arson and intimidation
Click to expand...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-wing_terrorism

Voyage · Sep 21, 2013

odonII said:

I do accept the fact that 'terrorism' is a broad term and statistics are but statistics.

What my Google provided...

http://www.state.gov/j/ct/rls/crt/
Click to expand...

cool. and, good link thanks.

Voyage · Sep 21, 2013

relaxxx said:

LOL, 24% extreme LEFT wing groups?
And what's the body toll on these supposed LEFT extremists?
Can they even fill one floor of one WTC building?

What a biased load of republican fucktarded bullshit.

And these RIGHT wing terrorists didn't make it on your graph at all?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-wing_terrorism
Click to expand...

24% equals how many terrorists?
75 right wing terrorists equals how many incidents?

did you even read the link? and are we really going to argue bs statistics?

Of all the unsurprising news of inflated numbers and double-counting contained in the Office of Inspector General's (OIG) audit of the DOJ's reported terrorism statistics, this sentence from the introduction of the report is the least surprising -- and by extension, the most damning.
Department resources devoted to preventing terrorism and promoting the nation’s security have increased from approximately $737 million in fiscal year (FY) 2001 to approximately $5.26 billion in FY 2012, an increase of 614 percent.
Despite the exponentially-increased budget and the fact that the EOUSA (which provides terrorism numbers to the DOJ) has had more than six years to get its case tracking system under control, the audit finds there has been little to no improvement. In fact, there's evidence the EOUSA (Executive Office for United States Attorneys) may be getting worse.
We found that although EOUSA revised its procedures for gathering, classifying, and reporting terrorism-related statistics based on the recommendations from our 2007 audit, EOUSA's implementation of the revised procedures was not effective to ensure that terrorism-related statistics were reported accurately. Specifically, we found that EOUSA inaccurately reported all 11 statistics we reviewed during this follow-up audit. Most of these 11 statistics were inaccurately reported by significant margins…

The continued inaccurate reporting by significant margins indicates that EOUSA needs to strengthen its implementation of controls for gathering, verifying, and reporting terrorism-related statistics.
Click to expand...

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20...inflated-double-counted-badly-organized.shtml

the fact that you have to use so many CAPS, exclamation marks and divide every side of the discussion into an either/or proposition makes it impossible to have a rational discussion.

it's not all or nothing man.

and, i don't subscribe to "right wing" political ideology any more than "left wing", no matter how you twist those definitions. go argue on the Art Bell forums Bro. best wishes tho.
you could, say, add some friends. or, take some time to see something, anything good about faith, rather than finding fault with it and fighting to prove it.

:sunny:

relaxxx · Sep 21, 2013

BS stats indeed. You post a BS chart that lists left wing acts and no mention of right at all.

That doesn't seem a little off to you?

Are you completely brain dead?

Voyage · Sep 22, 2013

not completely, keep trying.

Resistance isn't futile · Sep 22, 2013

Fukushima giant ‘ice wall’ to make crisis worse — Radioactive release into ocean from saltwater intrusion — Side effects ‘not good at all’ (AUDIO)

http://www.wbez.org/programs/worldv...gnition-fukushima-and-geopolitics-khat-108521

sunfighter · Jan 6, 2014

Here's the latest news on Fukushima and it's pretty much all bad. This story is not being followed by any of the major media. It says volumes that they don't want you to know about this.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/01/05/1267422/-The-News-About-Fukushima-Always-Gets-Worse

Log in or Sign up

Fukushima plume heading across Pacific to U.S. and Canada

Voyage Noam Sayin

odonII O

Marifana Member

relaxxx Senior Member

Voyage Noam Sayin

Voyage Noam Sayin

relaxxx Senior Member

Voyage Noam Sayin

Resistance isn't futile Member

sunfighter Hip Forums Supporter HipForums Supporter

Log in or Sign up

Fukushima plume heading across Pacific to U.S. and Canada

Voyage Noam Sayin

odonII O

Marifana Member

relaxxx Senior Member

Voyage Noam Sayin

Voyage Noam Sayin

relaxxx Senior Member

Voyage Noam Sayin

Resistance isn't futile Member

sunfighter Hip Forums Supporter HipForums Supporter

Useful Searches