No excuse is pursued. Harm is a reasoning gleaned from contextual relations. You can call me a liar all you want as your reasoning is harmless to me but it posits to you that the world is just that much more fucked up by virtue of my reasoning. I think your perspective insures or insists on harm and what you call serious concern appears morose because of a lack of joy in your own verdicts. I take responsibility for the effects of my own thinking.
Yes, I agree. Most people go to college because they think this will help them to earn more money in the future. However, I did NOT dare to enter a college classroom until I was 31. And I only did this because I was curious to learn what all the fuss was about? As it turned out, I was totally shocked by just how ruthless (and often clueless) the other students (and profs) revealed themselves to be. There was no such thing as compassion in the classroom. Only ambition. And ambition is a mistake. Donald Trump or Mother Teresa? What does the world require most? QP
You're silly, blindness is not a speech impediment. Evil means profoundly immoral and malevolent. So you are full of profound immorality and malevolence? Not a claim I make for myself or anyone else. Evil is not something claimed by the moral but by the moralizing..
Seeing energetic phenomena in terms of good and evil is the wrong way to correctly identify anything. Good and evil are a sliding scale without standard metrics and amounts to brutely apprehended impressionistic nonsense. (Good and evil) and (god and satan) are synonymous terms in the way we apprehend and respond to the world. We are devoted to good and we abhor evil and at the same time good is the expectation while evil is claimed as the undeniable or unavoidable fact. The right kind of knowledge is the knowledge of real things.
Well I don't know. What have you offered as far as knowledge on the subject of who we require most? There is that other students and professors are ruthless and clueless so on that basis we can get rid of other students and professors. There was no such thing as compassion in the classroom so we can assume that the compassionate don't go to school. That leaves you and the reason why you were there, an ambition to see what the fuss was about. Well you found something to fuss about did you learn anything from it? Did you know the supposed purpose of the classroom is to satisfy your curiosity?