Re:white People And Science/technology

I like Ancient Aliens too. It's 99.9% fodder, but then you also get to see cool locations and artifacts. Plus the guy with the wild hair is pretty entertaining.

 

It is an entertaining show, I think most people just dislike that it is on the history channel on which they expect more plausible or accurate content.

 

Try not to cum from this meme...

 

this tread is now about ancient aliens...

 

Which works just fine.

You see, the black and other non-white humans are not the same true species as white human. A human is a human is human. White, black or purple. However, the same argument, a dog is a dog is a dog is not the same argument, though the scientific description Canis Lupis Familiaris technically doesn't hold water. That is based on a bird is a bird is a bird, or any other living form. There is no reason why dogs and humans are not categorized as other animals.

Of course if you compare a Ruby-throated hummingbird (Archilochus colubris) to a Golden eagle (Aquila chrysaetos), yes there is significant difference. However, when you compare the Bushman Rabbit (Bunolagus monticularis) to the Pygmy Rabbit (Brachylagus idahoensis) or the Eastern Cottontail (Sylvilagus floridanus) to the Mountain Cottontail (Sylvilagus nuttallii); or the Desert Cottontail (Sylvilagus audubonii) to the Omilteme Cottontail (Sylvilagus insonus) and to the Central African Rabbit (Poelagus marjorita), the differences are there, some significant and some barely distinguishable.

Likewise with humans. Tell me there is no difference between Herve’ Villacheze (sp?) and Kareem Abdul Jabar or Machael Jackson and Tony Shalhoub. There is. Just as there is a difference between myself and Dude 111. Whatever difference that is. But the fact is, it’s there.

The white humans are not native, species wise, to Earth. WE, and yes I said “we”, come from somewhere else. Transplanted, if you will, for our species survival. Earth is one of hundreds of planets chosen from a groups of thousands. You have the climate, the vegetation, the flora and the fauna, animals and mammals, birds and fish. All of it comes into play.

Where we come from, we had no choice. Just as we are soon approaching here. We, the white people, are really, no different than the blacks and other non-whites, ethically. But we are so vastly different, origin wise, and even with the genetics that are available today, you will see both similarities and differences.

We are the same, and we must accept each other equally but with regards that we are all still quite very different.

I compare it again to dogs and cats. And other animals, too. When I see someone beating or torturing an animals, that is my family! As different as we are, they are still unique, living, intelligent beings that must be respected.


Yes, I eat meat, and I don’t cringe with the introduction of “pink slime”. For all any of us may know, that could be human meat. Pull a few random samples and do a DNA sequence on it I are ya. The results likely will make you vomit, I’m sure. Won’t bother me any. Provided the execution is done respectfully and without torture or pain.

Now think of that food concept again. How many people will be so willing to commit a crime if they understood once they’re “in the hole” it’s a 50/50 chance coming back alive? Like in a prison comedy I watched this black cook was pointing at different foods telling a guy “That’s meat. That’s NOT meat!” And “You don’t wanna know what THAT it is!” Or Charleston Heston and "Soylent Green".

Note: Earlier I watched a video show a camel butchered in compliance with Hamal. And it reminded me of the raw video I saw showing US journalists getting beheaded. In some instances just regular humans, Islam even, beheaded so the children can learn how to do it (which is an abomination unto The Quoran). I’ll pass on the emotional description I have on those videos. But I will say when they slaughtered that camel, it was like watching my brother be slaughtered... uke:


No, we are not left here to die or destroy the Earth. Nor are we baby sat. But if you compare what I have said to the scientific explanation and the Biblical explanation, you’ll see that what I say fits the missing piece between the two quite nicely. We were observed and assisted some in our early stages of development. And we are observed now. Don't wanna be a Guinea Pig? Too bad! Welcome to Planet Earth!

 

Hi Logan 5, yeah man. We all must walk how we are convinced and according to our understandings.

Where did you learn the bulk of this information?

 

they still do. those who don't took a boat to Rome (or New York, Marseille) in order not to.

 

Yeah, every black fellow who still lives in Africa does live in a clay mud hut.... :unsure:

'they still do' is right (as enough of them still do so indeed). The rest of your post makes it not right.

 

Did you know white people live in cardboard boxes? Black people live in houses.

 

So why do black africans not have any neandrathal dna? if we were all black once? even blacks in africa would have neandrathal dna, yet they don't.

 

@eieyejew

No such thing as a "Neanderthal". According to my understanding.

And according to your understanding what is Neanderthal DNA?

 

.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tyBs6-cmFvQ
"... and we are all together"

 

there is too such thing as a Neanderthal. Homo neanderthalensis lived between 200-250 thousand years ago.

I assume he means neanderthal genes through interbreeding with modern humans. I have heard the hypothesis that interbreeding could have occurred, don't know if it holds any water or not but i would think that if interbreeding occurred, it would have been with whatever group of humans was in western europe at the time.

 

Yeah true, and according to that theory then I would say that the possibility exists, and he is right. We all walk as we are convinced, true true


That said, my understanding is that I believe the more weightier evidence supports the notion that there were no such things as a species of Neanderthals that were different, yet similar to humans, that had interbred. The Neanderthal theory rest on the bones, which can be interpreted to fit any model, and in this case the mainstream model is the evolutionary one....which I think, of course is false.

There is a lot of evidence that say the bones (that are used to support the separate, but yet similar to human Neanderthals) could be shown to be nothing else than regular human. But again, it just comes down to where one is at in their understanding, and where they are at in the seeking knowledge. Any theory needs to be supported by all else,

This could be an interesting thread topic.

//

Back to the main point of the thread, that at one time all man was "black" skinned and "white" skin was not yet a trait expressed by man, who happens to be one race despite outside differences. The invention of the "white race" started to come about in around the 1660's after in the American colonies "whites" and "blacks" untied in a rebellion called Bacon's rebellion. This threated the oppressive power structure, so social, economic and other differences were made, to keep "one race" fighting the other, keep "one race" more privileged than the "other" while in reality the poor are still poor and the oppressor continues to refine his wonderful oppressive knowledge.

Your thoughts?

 

GE // Genetic Engineering.

 

Indeed, by aggrieved albino pygmees.

 

Neanderthal DNA has been sequenced. Also there are some subtle anatomical differences as well.

 

Yeah I'm familiar with the rhetoric and the interpretations, but there is no evidence outside of a belief that it is there.

 

There are also subtle anatomical diferences between one homo sapiens and the next.

 

It would do you well to read a book called Bones of Contention.