I know that the term MRA has been associated with certain groups (including the red pill people) and now has negative connotations, but I think that the basic ideas behind the MRAs is that they want to stand up for equality in areas where things are not good for men. There are a lot of institutions in our society that are very anti-male biased nowdays, especially in education and law. There are some influential, extreme feminist groups out there that really hate men, and so it is inevitable that there was some backlash. I think that there are some much more orthodox, and easier to defend oppositions to Aruini's youtube channel, besides ethical hedonism. It's not that I disagree with you about ethical hedonism. I just don't think it's a good philosophy to use to argue against the supposed chauvinism in his youtube channel. I don't like most of Aruini's video's about gender stuff, but I liked the one he did on nihilism. I've actually talked to Davis Aruini personally, and though I'd say that his views are way too conservative (and chauvinistic) for me, he's not really hateful of women, whereas a lot of the militant feminists from the other side of the debate are unashamedly hateful of men. Orison know's what's up
I adore sluts. Sluts are a national treasure. People travel from around the world to get with an American slut. I bet 5/6 of Americans had their first sexual encounter with an experienced slut. I sure did!
what is the 80/20 rule you guys are talking about, i dont want to sit through the whole video, i just cant.
I made it through about a minute of that first video. As soon as he said "Two thirds of all divorces are caused for frivolous reasons on the part of the woman" I realized that this person obviously doesn't understand what a fact is.
Only retaining the rights to ignore, laugh at and say "no" to matter. The rest of it is probably something gays or feminists made up anyway. Never volunteer to be more confused by children more than you already are...