Woman Who Pretended To Be Man To Trick Friend Into Sex Jailed For Eight Years

Come on, you can't judge someone from their mugshot photo. My mugshot photos are the absolute worst.

 

lol...you are funny.....I id see a far better shot of her going into court...she obviousy ''ladied'' up for the case to throw some doubt on the victims story

tbc...i'm with you on this one Audrey.......there is no way she didn't peek out of that blind fold

but I personally am not up on the various appendages you can order but i'm guessing you can buy a pretty convincing penis apparatus and if you only have the dick part sticking out of the fly...which is dangerous as hell leme say right here.....I could see her being stupid enough to not realize....

 

a real penis is warm. when you put a dildo into your anus (or some other body cavity) it will go in feeling cold. even before insertion you feel its coldness against your skin where it touches you.

secondly, dildos have a characteristic rigidity to them that a penis doesn't. you can say that a penis is yielding in shape (especially the head part). it conforms and molds to the contact. most clearly this is felt around the sphincter muscle just before insertion and during penetration. (i can't speak for vaginal insertion). when you push in a dildo head it is not malleable, it's made of a harder material than your flesh (unlike cock head) and you can tell it's not a real penis.

when you contract you sphincter muscles against the penis it gives in a little, when you contract them against a dildo they are met with an unyielding resistance uncharacteristic that of a penis. basically, you can feel that what's in there is made of a harder material than human flesh.

if you're doing it bareback there is no confusion. human skin conducts electricity. skin on skin contact is obviously distinguishable from an inert plastic contact.

 

dude please I don't need or want an anatomy lesson....do you think the magistrate and various solicitors didn't quoyte the same crap?....besides...havnt you eber heard of popping stuff in a microwave or cup of hot water so it don't shock the twat?

sheesh again

 

don't read it then when you come across a part that offends you.

 

no offense here...you explained something I didn't need explained...I got kids the old fashioned way....


... mw..your expertise on dildo's and cock is probably appreciated by some though...the reality is it was proved beyond a reasonable doubt in a court that you can get away with exactly what I said....so save me the warm cock speech...that's all ...

 

No it wouldn't.

Informed consent merely requires that you understand the situation before you make your decision, the medium that you communicate your consent in (verbal, written, implied etc.) and the way in which you gain your understanding (verbal, written, implied etc) is irrelevant.

 

point me to the part where it was said in court records that she warmed that dildo to a human body temperature and that that's why the victim couldn't tell the difference. temp control like that on a rubber item is near impossible. putting it in a microwave is a joke, it would melt. hot water, etc -- you'd have to get the temp exactly right, because a person can tell when a thing is cooler or hotter than their own body temperature. so where are the court records that show that that's what she achieved? if it was proven beyond reasonable doubt that she did that and that the victim was fooled 100% then why is anybody here even contesting that possibility? (besides, temperature wasn't the only thing i pointed out that would clearly differentiate between the two).

nothing was proven in that court session. one side is claiming one thing, and the other side is claiming something else. people have reasonable grounds to think it's impossible to confuse a dildo for a dick. i'm not the only one who argued that. i just went into more specifics.

and if you haven't ever put a dildo and a cock up your ass you are not actually in a position to tell how easy it is to tell a difference or not. you're just guessing. no offense.

and the part about you not needing to have specifics explained....you know this particular thread is about dildos and cocks and the difference between them. and when someone points to the details of the matter that takes you off guard? really? what exactly did you expect from a thread which has dildo use as a subject matter?

you know i'm gay. it's also a reasonable expectation that i bring up the topic of male-male sex and cocks at some point or another. put me on ignore if this is unacceptable to you. if you don't want to read about warm dicks, then don't. it is that simple. other than that, i don't see what your problem is.

 

Of course the person needs to understand the situation, and permission needs to be given, verbal, written or whatever. Implied consent and informed consent are two different things.

 

Exactly, and in this case consent was given when the person did not understand the situation as a result of a deliberation deception, therefore it isn't informed consent and should not be considered valid.

 

Maybe you should read my original post, instead on continuously quoting me.

 

I read this case somewhere. And I thought "I didn't knwo Viz magazine had an online version".

What absolute wackos. I'd deport the convcited one, the "victim" AND the jerkoff of a judge to somewhere like Anglesey for the next 50 yrs.
To think how much money was/will be wasted on this pile of shit.

 

hole molee you used a shit load of words there.....nicely done...you win ..


ftr....I am not worked up like some others about these lunatics....honestly who gives a flying fuck...



ps....blindfold party at my house

 

that's true.