Bill Nye You're Dead To Me

I don't know why you are fixated on Bill Nye's degree. Are you suggesting that some type of advanced scientific degree is needed to support science?
What are you talking about with the Democrat statement? Democrats don't want people to have an education?

There are many, many types of B.S. degrees...not all of them are awarded for engineering.
There are several types of mechanical engineers. Depending on the institution and type of study, you can earn different types of Bachelor of Engineering degrees in the U.S. as noted below:

There are also Associate (2 year), Master's, and Doctoral degrees in Engineering.

Engineers may seek a license, but it's not necessary for graduation from various programs. A state licensed engineer would be a PE (professional engineer). The license is only needed in the U.S if you are offering services directly to the general public. This is where the Fundamentals of Engineering exam and Principles and Practice of Engineering test come in.

He probably patented his "water bag" magnifying glass so he could include it in his science kits without fear of it being copied by others.

Nye was the one who came up with the concept of using the solar panel calibration devices as sundials. The devices were to be used for color calibration of the cameras. Nye proposed also using them to tell time.

 

Puff has a problem that I'm trying to figure out.

Bill Nye holds a degree in Engineering from Cornell University. Here are the requirements for the degree: Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering B.S., Mechanical Engineering

He worked as a mechanical engineer at Boeing.
Here is a definition of a mechanical engineering from Merriam Webster:

He holds three patents ( I forgot the one for a digital abacus).
He worked with a team at the NASA and California Institute of Technology’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory to design and create the MarsDial.
Here's what it is:

But to get to the point. Puff seems to be upset because he doesn't agree with what Bill Nye says about something..maybe climate change..I don't know.
Instead of attacking what he is saying or what Puff disagrees with about what Bill Nye says, he chooses to attack Bill Nye by attacking his credentials.

This is akin to attacking Ben Franklin's theories on electricity, not on their merit, but because Ben Franklin never held an engineering or scientific degree.
He doesn't accept that Bill Nye worked as an engineer because he doesn't want to. He seems to think that a degree from Cornell is worthless and holding a job at Boeing that required mechanical work on 747's doesn't qualify anyone as a mechanical engineer.

So getting to the root of the discussion...what is it that bothers you Puff, about what Bill Nye has said?

 

That's my point. If there is a question about what Nye said about something, address what he said and see if it corresponds to the prevailing opinion of the majority of scientists and see if it is valid as to the latest scientific findings.

If you have a problem with the way he presents certain aspects of science don't attack him...attack what he says.

 

I'm not an expert...maybe you are...I'm going by the research I've done here on the net.

Here are some sources:
XY female condition.

XX Males.

I don't know where you got your information.

As to my "freaky chromosomal mutations". I never said they were common. You stated that there were only two genders. I have pointed out medical conditions in which there is physical confusion as to gender. You have not specified what you consider to be gender. I have pointed out cases of xy, xx, xxy, xxyy, etc. sexual chromosomes and cases of individuals with female or male chromosomes and the opposite physical organs. Your claim was that there are no abnormalities, I think, not how many or rare the abnormalities are....so who cares about the frequency?
I also notice you haven't commented on Hermaphrodites.

 

So let's assume Bilk Nye never finished high school and is nothing more than an actor. Does that make his science messages any less valued?
If he is presenting solid scientific techniques, theories, and procedures in an entertaining way...so what?

Many people had no problem electing an actor as president of the United States, so what's your beef?


Is there something he is presenting as a valid scientific theory, procedure, or fact that you disagree with?

 

Apparently you don't agree with NASA.
I don't think climate change deniers should be put in jail...they're just idiots.
Nye never said they should be put in jail, he said...and I quote, "We'll see." And we don't know the full context of that statement.
So your position is that those who represent, or popularize science to the public should not have personal opinions?

 

I see, you blindly follow fake News (propaganda)!

And so on.

But you don't have to believe NASA.
How do scientists know that recent climate change is largely caused ...

Human Caused Global Warming — OSS Foundation

Do We Know that Humans Are the Major Cause of Global Warming

Scientists: Strong evidence that human-caused climate change ...

Empirical evidence that humans are causing global warming

Scientific opinion on climate change - Wikipedia

What Evidence Would Persuade You That Man-Made Climate Change ...

The Scientific Evidence, with a 95% Level of Certainty, Points to ...

Twentieth century climate change: evidence from small glaciers

The economic impacts of climate change: evidence from agricultural output and random fluctuations in weather

Evidence and implications of recent climate change in northern Alaska and other arctic regions

Ecological responses to recent climate change

Observational evidence of recent change in the northern high-latitude environment

ETC.

 

I understand that you think all governments are part of the global conspiracy.

OSS headquartered in Madrid, nonprofit, open source. Obvious conspiracy member, no facts supporting that claim needed.

WBGU - independent scientific advisory council to the German government....another link in the conspiracy. They suggested that private pension funds invest in "green technologies".

Sounds like a god idea.

UCS headquartered in the U.S. Nonprofit. Founded at MIT....radical left wing technical school dedicated to global dominance.
Attacked by groups such as Activistfacts, a lobbyist group for the fast food, meat, alcohol, and tobacco industry.

You skipped NOAA...oh right government agency=conspiracy.

ANTIFA? Perhaps? Maybe? Could Be?
Who funded, who paid, biased, social scientist, bullshit books, cooks up schemes and rants......

A very organized rebuttal of the information presented, I must say.

Sorry I forgot nothing in Wikipedia is ever correct, pardon me.
And I never called you stupid by the way.

Actually seventh link. I read it.

Ron Bailey, the man in the link I provided, explains how he once thought global warming wasn't real, but now he does.

Finally, It seems you forgot to address the other links or the data in any of them.




So we have a global conspiracy headquartered in Britain, Spain, Germany, and the U.S. involved in stealing our pension funds, may be part of ANTIFA, and they brain washed a man who once called global warming not real.

Okay.

 

I don't understand what he is talking about. I can't find any proof that climate change is a hoax in any link that I posted, and yes I read them all.

He seems particularly upset by the site Skeptical Science founded by John Cook. Skeptical Science counters arguments by climate change hoax advocates.
John cook has an undergraduate degree in physics from the University of Queensland and completed a post-graduate honors year studying solar physics. He was also a web and database programmer.