9/11

And now you're going to claim that there was no melting of steel at WTC?

 

It's way worse than that. These folks are just lying outright, all the time because they know that volumes of evidence have been
put forward, any one of which sinks the USGOCT.

And zero evidence for the USGOCT from any of them.

Like maybe some evidence for their USGOCT.

 

North Tower Exploding by David Chandler

 

The Missing Jolt: A Simple Refutation of the NIST-Bazant Collapse Hypothesis Graeme MacQueen Tony Szamboti April 22, 2009*

http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/2008/TheMissingJolt7.pdf

 

vaporize isnt the same as melt

 

But storch seems to disagree with you as well though, you say no planes hit the towers, he is saying there was a point of impact

 

height of the internal structure that remained in tact, and either of your definition of what the "core" is/was

 

Well then, you should easily be able to answer the question

 

I know what the core was because I looked into it so that I wouldn't have to ask someone else and appear uninformed.

Did you finally research it?

 

Ah, the final death throes of a debunker who's been shown to be uninformed on the topic of discussion--trying to play those who caught him against each other.

Has camlok declared that no plane hit the building?

 

So you agree that there was melting of steel in WTC?

 

Ok it was the US government Just Googled it and there are Two Million people work for them ! How many of those Two million Do you think were in on it ? Serious question !! you don't Wire two buildings of that size with explosives on your own or access such a large amount of magic exploding stuff without a paper trail Oh and the planes Did they hit the Building or not ?

 

This is a classic denialist argument. You believe that if someone can't tell you who did it, why they did it, and how they did it, then you don't have to explain how the upper block of the North Tower dropped through the core structure below at a rate just 40 feet shy of freefall through a 360 drop; how the more heat damaged upper block would maintain its integrity to the extent that it would destroy the intact core structure below?

 

There was both, melting and vaporizing, as shown in the evidence I posted. "evidence", that is something that no USGOCT conspiracy theorists know anything about.

 

I replied Ages ago the Towers were hit By aircraft that's a Fact people saw it happen !!
I asked a serious Question and will ask again in case you didnt understand

HOW MANY PEOPLE do you think it would take to organize what you claim to have happened
I don't need names Just numbers ?

 

NO EVIDENCE FROM YOU FOR THE USGOCT, CONSPIRACY THEORIST MALLYBOPPA.

1. Lame lame lame. The Manhattan Project wasn't revealed, even Truman didn't know until some time into his office. The Gulf of Tonkin wasn't revealed for years. Operation Northwoods wasn't revealed. The US has pulled off many false flags.

2. Did you miss the article on the massive twin towers elevator upgrade or did you see it and you are now just lying?

3. You are lying about the nanothermite because numerous cites have been made for it. What melted/vaporized the WTC steel?

4. Did the planes that the USGOCT says hit the towers actually hit the towers. Show your evidence for your position.

 

I don't know. But judging by your question, it is apparent that you are abandoning the issue of the impossibility of a virtual freefall of the upper block of the North Tower through the course of most resistance--the intact core structure below it. And you're hoping that my not knowing the details of how someone made that happen will somehow negate the fact of the upper block's virtual freefall through the intact core structure below. But my not knowing the details of how it was done doesn't make the question go away. Do you understand what I'm saying to you?

 

Just want a straight answer not Bullshit ( how many people would it take to pull this off )

 

So you are arguing about something and you have no idea how it could have been achieved ?

 

Of course they agree, as they have all read the FEMA, Appendix C Report

============