9/11

With explosives, specifically, US government proprietary nanothermite.

Do you deny that US government military scientists discovered nano scale super explosives in the 1990s?

Do you deny that this same nanothermite was discovered in WTC dust?

Do you deny that the by products of these nanothermitic reactions were found in WTC dust in large volumes?

 

I'm not arguing about how something could be achieved. I'm pointing out the impossibility of what was observed. You, on the other hand, are arguing against the impossibility of what was observed by stating that if no one can tell you the number of people involved, then the impossibility of what was observed can be ignored. That's some kind of fallacy you've got working for you there.

 

Then stop with your bullshitting, Mallyboppa. That's all you bring to the discussion. Discuss the molten/vaporized WTC steel. It sinks your goofy USGOCT.

Didn't you pretend that you were going to leave this thread? Another of the childish ploys of USGOCT conspiracy theorists.

 

You haven't provided any evidence to prove your ridiculous claim, ridiculous because you conspiracy theorists just have lame theories but NEVER any evidence.

Where is your evidence for you silly claim?

Ridiculous because you conspiracy theorists ignore all the voluminous evidence that totally sinks your USGOCT.

Many people on September 11, 2001 said it was a military plane, not a jet liner.

 

I rest my case !

 

You tell me as you are the conspiracy theorist who thinks that "hijackers" can melt/vaporize WTC steel, that they can access US government thermite and wire three towers all from Afghanistan, that they can make buildings fall at free fall speed, that they can [insert nonsensical USGOCT crap].

 

What case, Oh I'm gonna leave this thread because I hate the truth, I hate science and I hate evidence mallyboppa?

 

Which of the five buildings on fire in that picture a few posts before collapsed, mallyboppa? You conspiracy theorists can't answer any questions, address any evidence or science. Why do you ignore science and evidence? Look the two words up in a dictionary because you folks obviously don't know what they mean?

 

Riiight. You made the case that if no one knows how many people were involved, then you can ignore the impossibility of what was observed. As I said, that's some kind of fallacy you've got working for you there.

 

Do you guys really believe no airplanes hit the towers? Pls clarify.

 

I'm glad I don't live my life with the assumption that there are boogeymen around every corner.

 

Hey, muslims are boogeymen!

 

I'm glad I don't live my life believing in an impossible collapse simply because that's what I was told happened.

 

No. Airplane hit the Tower.

 

You and Running Horse should talk. He believes that they should all be bombed.

 

Might have been my imagination, but as I was fixing to go to work on that day--I saw both airliners hit the buildings. I did not go to work that day.

 

No one is disputing that.

 

Ok. Then I misunderstood his position.

 

I assume his point is that it was not a commercial airliner that struck the South Tower.

 

Yes