Teens from Catholic School in MAGA hats mock and intimidate Native American Elder

deleted · Jan 22, 2019

Asmodean · Jan 22, 2019

tumbling.dice said: ↑

I hope everyone realizes I was being sarcastic. I do not support violence in a representative democracy.
Click to expand...

But, but...:

MeAgain · Jan 22, 2019

From what I understand of the situation.

The Indians were holding an approved Indigenous Peoples March at the time.
The MAGA group was attending an anti abortion March for Life event.
Both events were approved.

The Indigenous Peoples March was ending when the five Black Hebrew Israelites showed up at the edge of the area approved for the Indigenous Peoples March. They were extremely vocal and were taunting everyone in the area including the Indians. The Indians ignored them as they were outside of their approved area.
Then the Covington Catholic High School began showing up at their predetermined bus area to go home.

At this point the Black Hebrew Israelites also began taunting them.
Unlike the Indians they did not ignore them. They asked a chaperon if they could counter the Israelites by chanting their own school chants.
This was the first mistake. The chaperons should never have allowed the chanting by the students to occur. They should have ignored the Black Israelites, just as the Indians had done.
The second mistake was that the Chaperons should have moved their group of students away from the confrontation leaving one or two chaperons to wait for the bus.

So now we have two groups, one throwing insults, the other, the students, chanting back at them and performing a Māori Haka war dance. A sure recipe for an escalation.
Mistake number three, where were the chaperons? The boys should have been told to immediately stop.
Nathan Phillips feared that the situation was getting out of hand and thought he could defuse it by approaching the boys and singing a Native American song.
Marcus Frejo, another Native American joined him. Frejo felt they were mocking the dance and the Black Israelites.
Mistake number four. They underestimated the power of mob mentality.

As the two Indians approached they felt that the young men turned on them and begin mocking them, some joining their song, some dancing, some executing "Tomahawk Chops", a gesture deemed insulting to many Native Americans.
At this point the Indians became surrounded and Nathan Phillips was confronted by Nick Sandmann, the boy with the unusual expression on his face.

Mistake number five.
Nick Sandmann should never have placed himself in that position, especially with that look on his face. He was clearly engaged in an act of defying Nathan Phillips, right or wrong.

Nathan Phillips and Marcus Frejo now realized they were in dangerous position and apparently felt they had better halt their walk and continue their song and hope for the best.

I place the blame almost entirely on the chaperones of this boy's school. They failed to act to protect their students, to see they stay out of confrontations, and to be a positive example for and of their school.
Nathan Phillips and Marcus Frejo bear some fault for thinking they could defuse an ugly situation.

The Black Muslium Israelites were idiots and should have been ignored by everyone.

Meliai · Jan 22, 2019

^seems a fair asssessment

NotMyRealName · Jan 22, 2019

Orison said: ↑

Click to expand...

I won't hold my breath waiting for SNL to discipline her.

NotMyRealName · Jan 22, 2019

MeAgain said: ↑

From what I understand of the situation.

The Indians were holding an approved Indigenous Peoples March at the time.
The MAGA group was attending an anti abortion March for Life event.
Both events were approved.

The Indigenous Peoples March was ending when the five Black Hebrew Israelites showed up at the edge of the area approved for the Indigenous Peoples March. They were extremely vocal and were taunting everyone in the area including the Indians. The Indians ignored them as they were outside of their approved area.
Then the Covington Catholic High School began showing up at their predetermined bus area to go home.

At this point the Black Hebrew Israelites also began taunting them.
Unlike the Indians they did not ignore them. They asked a chaperon if they could counter the Israelites by chanting their own school chants.
This was the first mistake. The chaperons should never have allowed the chanting by the students to occur. They should have ignored the Black Israelites, just as the Indians had done.
The second mistake was that the Chaperons should have moved their group of students away from the confrontation leaving one or two chaperons to wait for the bus.

So now we have two groups, one throwing insults, the other, the students, chanting back at them and performing a Māori Haka war dance. A sure recipe for an escalation.
Mistake number three, where were the chaperons? The boys should have been told to immediately stop.
Nathan Phillips feared that the situation was getting out of hand and thought he could defuse it by approaching the boys and singing a Native American song.
Marcus Frejo, another Native American joined him. Frejo felt they were mocking the dance and the Black Israelites.
Mistake number four. They underestimated the power of mob mentality.

As the two Indians approached they felt that the young men turned on them and begin mocking them, some joining their song, some dancing, some executing "Tomahawk Chops", a gesture deemed insulting to many Native Americans.
At this point the Indians became surrounded and Nathan Phillips was confronted by Nick Sandmann, the boy with the unusual expression on his face.

Mistake number five.
Nick Sandmann should never have placed himself in that position, especially with that look on his face. He was clearly engaged in an act of defying Nathan Phillips, right or wrong.

Nathan Phillips and Marcus Frejo now realized they were in dangerous position and apparently felt they had better halt their walk and continue their song and hope for the best.

I place the blame almost entirely on the chaperones of this boy's school. They failed to act to protect their students, to see they stay out of confrontations, and to be a positive example for and of their school.
Nathan Phillips and Marcus Frejo bear some fault for thinking they could defuse an ugly situation.

The Black Muslium Israelites were idiots and should have been ignored by everyone.
Click to expand...

You kind of left out some stuff.

If the Indians felt threatened, they made no attempt to retreat. As you proclaim the boys should have done. They approached the boys. And get within inches of the boys face while beating a drum. That by itself appears threatening.

Next you leave out the statement made by Nathan Williams that they heard the chants Build the Wall. Which was totally false. At least in the 2 hours of film that led up to it to appease McFuddys hypothesis.

And none of us have a clue of that boys facial expressions. Your smirk might be his smile.

If a person whom we've never seen before can threaten someone with a smirk, then I get threats by about 2,000 people a month.

The boys account clearly stated he didn't want to appear threatening, so he didn't raise an arm or clench a fist or do anything. All of which he could have done. So he conscoiusly made efforts to not appear threatening.

Mr. Phillips did not.

I believe the boys were probably told that they might get some heat for being there for a Anti Abortion cause and wearing MAGA hats. Probably were told how to conduct themselves if something did happen.

I think they felt they could let their guard down when the rally ended and we're taken by surprise a bit while waiting on a bus.

The one thing we can agree on is it's a perfect example of black racist, being black racist. A good teaching moment for those that find that thought totally impossible.

Vanilla Gorilla · Jan 22, 2019

Wow, we still going on about this "story"

tumbling.dice · Jan 22, 2019

^^^Yeah, until the next mass shooting.

Meliai · Jan 22, 2019

Stay tuned for the next outrage shortly

Deleted member 42017 · Jan 22, 2019

Orison said: ↑

Click to expand...

I'd dress up as the kid and punch myself for that!

goodearth · Jan 22, 2019

HE LIED: Native American Activist Nathan Phillips Never Served in Vietnam — But Raised Money By Saying He Did
by Cassandra Fairbanks January 22, 2019 624 Comments

19.3KShare

461Tweet

Email

The Washington Post has had to issue yet another retraction after falsely claiming that far-left Native American activist Nathan Phillips served in the Vietnam War. He didn’t — but this lie was previously used to help raise money for a documentary about his life.
On Monday, the Washington Post quietly issued a correction to their story about the activist, saying that while he served in the Marines, he was never deployed to Vietnam.

goodearth · Jan 22, 2019

Deleted member 42017 · Jan 22, 2019

MeAgain said: ↑

From what I understand of the situation.

The Indians were holding an approved Indigenous Peoples March at the time.
The MAGA group was attending an anti abortion March for Life event.
Both events were approved.

The Indigenous Peoples March was ending when the five Black Hebrew Israelites showed up at the edge of the area approved for the Indigenous Peoples March. They were extremely vocal and were taunting everyone in the area including the Indians. The Indians ignored them as they were outside of their approved area.
Then the Covington Catholic High School began showing up at their predetermined bus area to go home.

At this point the Black Hebrew Israelites also began taunting them.
Unlike the Indians they did not ignore them. They asked a chaperon if they could counter the Israelites by chanting their own school chants.
This was the first mistake. The chaperons should never have allowed the chanting by the students to occur. They should have ignored the Black Israelites, just as the Indians had done.
The second mistake was that the Chaperons should have moved their group of students away from the confrontation leaving one or two chaperons to wait for the bus.

So now we have two groups, one throwing insults, the other, the students, chanting back at them and performing a Māori Haka war dance. A sure recipe for an escalation.
Mistake number three, where were the chaperons? The boys should have been told to immediately stop.
Nathan Phillips feared that the situation was getting out of hand and thought he could defuse it by approaching the boys and singing a Native American song.
Marcus Frejo, another Native American joined him. Frejo felt they were mocking the dance and the Black Israelites.
Mistake number four. They underestimated the power of mob mentality.

As the two Indians approached they felt that the young men turned on them and begin mocking them, some joining their song, some dancing, some executing "Tomahawk Chops", a gesture deemed insulting to many Native Americans.
At this point the Indians became surrounded and Nathan Phillips was confronted by Nick Sandmann, the boy with the unusual expression on his face.

Mistake number five.
Nick Sandmann should never have placed himself in that position, especially with that look on his face. He was clearly engaged in an act of defying Nathan Phillips, right or wrong.

Nathan Phillips and Marcus Frejo now realized they were in dangerous position and apparently felt they had better halt their walk and continue their song and hope for the best.

I place the blame almost entirely on the chaperones of this boy's school. They failed to act to protect their students, to see they stay out of confrontations, and to be a positive example for and of their school.
Nathan Phillips and Marcus Frejo bear some fault for thinking they could defuse an ugly situation.

The Black Muslium Israelites were idiots and should have been ignored by everyone.
Click to expand...

So their first "mistake" was exercising their right to free speech, while others were exercising their right to free speech and using it to spew racism, sexism and anti-gay rhetoric at a group of children? And then they were supposed to leave the area, where they had every right to be, just to accommodate the people spewing vile language at them?

It's interesting to watch the lawyers lining up to cash in on the obvious while the people who knee-jerked and called for shit like Doxing, punching, killing (with a wood chipper) and attacking their school are deleting their posts and hiding.

I found Molyneux's perspective to be interesting on this issue:

goodearth · Jan 22, 2019

Zero Hedge | On a long enough timeline the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
SGT Report
X22Report

Deleted member 42017 · Jan 22, 2019

NotMyRealName said: ↑

You kind of left out some stuff.

If the Indians felt threatened, they made no attempt to retreat. As you proclaim the boys should have done. They approached the boys. And get within inches of the boys face while beating a drum. That by itself appears threatening.

Next you leave out the statement made by Nathan Williams that they heard the chants Build the Wall. Which was totally false. At least in the 2 hours of film that led up to it to appease McFuddys hypothesis.

And none of us have a clue of that boys facial expressions. Your smirk might be his smile.

If a person whom we've never seen before can threaten someone with a smirk, then I get threats by about 2,000 people a month.

The boys account clearly stated he didn't want to appear threatening, so he didn't raise an arm or clench a fist or do anything. All of which he could have done. So he conscoiusly made efforts to not appear threatening.

Mr. Phillips did not.

I believe the boys were probably told that they might get some heat for being there for a Anti Abortion cause and wearing MAGA hats. Probably were told how to conduct themselves if something did happen.

I think they felt they could let their guard down when the rally ended and we're taken by surprise a bit while waiting on a bus.

The one thing we can agree on is it's a perfect example of black racist, being black racist. A good teaching moment for those that find that thought totally impossible.
Click to expand...

One point, Pro-Life is just pro-life. It's not specifically anti-abortion, it's just not. All the pro-life movement is about is reminding people that life is a gift and should be considered. The people who started calling it anti-abortion knew what they were doing with the language. It's similar to calling illegal aliens (as they are called all over the world) "undocumented workers" or "migrants". They are neither. When you sneak into a country, you're a criminal all over the planet, except in America. In America, you're ambiguous and will soon be living a life of limbo.

While I am certainly pro-life, I am not anti-abortion at all. I don't believe in trying to regulate several uniquely human behaviors that have been with us for millennia. Abortions are as old as humanity, but so is cooking, humor, addiction, murder and pedophilia (those last 2 are on the list of things I don't support).

goodearth · Jan 22, 2019

NotMyRealName · Jan 22, 2019

************ said: ↑

One point, Pro-Life is just pro-life. It's not specifically anti-abortion, it's just not. All the pro-life movement is about is reminding people that life is a gift and should be considered. The people who started calling it anti-abortion knew what they were doing with the language. It's similar to calling illegal aliens (as they are called all over the world) "undocumented workers" or "migrants". They are neither. When you sneak into a country, you're a criminal all over the planet, except in America. In America, you're ambiguous and will soon be living a life of limbo.

While I am certainly pro-life, I am not anti-abortion at all. I don't believe in trying to regulate several uniquely human behaviors that have been with us for millennia. Abortions are as old as humanity, but so is cooking, humor, addiction, murder and pedophilia (those last 2 are on the list of things I don't support).
Click to expand...

I agree with you. But if I didn't say anti abortion the left would blow a gasket that I wasn't labelling correctly.

I'm pro choice. But that term seems to have become antiquated.

Asmodean · Jan 22, 2019

NotMyRealName said: ↑

I'm pro choice. But that term seems to have become antiquated.
Click to expand...

It is? What's the new term for it?

lode · Jan 22, 2019

Asmodean said: ↑

It is? What's the new term for it?
Click to expand...

Anti-Birth?

deleted · Jan 22, 2019

Covington students, Nathan Phillips viral video: Twitter suspends acc…
Twitter suspends account that helped ignite controversy over viral encounter.

Log in or Sign up

Teens from Catholic School in MAGA hats mock and intimidate Native American Elder

deleted Visitor

Asmodean Slo motion rider

MeAgain Dazed & Confused Lifetime Supporter Super Moderator

Meliai Members

NotMyRealName Members

NotMyRealName Members

Vanilla Gorilla Go Ape

tumbling.dice Visitor

Meliai Members

Deleted member 42017 Visitor

goodearth Member

goodearth Member

Deleted member 42017 Visitor

goodearth Member

Deleted member 42017 Visitor

goodearth Member

NotMyRealName Members

Asmodean Slo motion rider

lode Banned

deleted Visitor

Share This Page

Log in or Sign up

Teens from Catholic School in MAGA hats mock and intimidate Native American Elder

deleted Visitor

Asmodean Slo motion rider

MeAgain Dazed & Confused Lifetime Supporter Super Moderator

Meliai Members

NotMyRealName Members

NotMyRealName Members

Vanilla Gorilla Go Ape

tumbling.dice Visitor

Meliai Members

Deleted member 42017 Visitor

goodearth Member

goodearth Member

Deleted member 42017 Visitor

goodearth Member

Deleted member 42017 Visitor

goodearth Member

NotMyRealName Members

Asmodean Slo motion rider

lode Banned

deleted Visitor

Share This Page

Useful Searches