Very interesting. I don't know if I'd want to be experimented on with HIV, but if the doctors say it's safe they probably know better than I do.
I dunno, if I had a cancer that was a certain death sentence I would certainly take the risk of contracting HIV in order to cure it. You can live many years with HIV if you manage your health and stay on the drugs....
wow, can anything good actually come of this? that just boggles my mind. you're right though, ellis...sometimes a clinical trial is the only chance some people can see for themselves.
it intrigues the mind, but maks me worry a bit. i mean if they can tweak HIV to attack cancer, then where are they in their HIV/AIDS research? where is the note of progress in combating HIV/AIDS?
Jesus, Ellis. This sounds JUST like an American, REPUBLICAN idea. It's that STUPID. Cancer patients can live NATURAL life spans without medication, depending on the type of cancer they have. WHY take the risk of getting AIDS? (There is a difference between HIV and AIDS as Ellis knows. I only mention this to educate the rest of you.)
Well, human trials are a LONG way off, and I'm sure the only patients who are going to be allowed into clinical trials would be those with aggressive, metastatic cancers that aren't responding to other treatments. I'm sure this kind of treatment will not be used for slow-growing cancers or those that respond well to surgical or other approaches.
A cure for cancer has been "about 50 years from now" for about the last 50 years. Kinda like nuclear fusion power....
any possible 'cures' to cancer will be buried by the pHarma-corps. it's just not something that we'll ever see. Unfortunately, there's no profit to a cancer 'cure'