When "daddies" still seek "daddies"......

Regardless of the sexes taking part, not genders. I really wish y'all would stop using this inaccurate reference and connecting it to bisexuality. I despise the fact that some talking heads on the Internet removed "sexes" from the bisexual equation in favor of gender when gender identity has nothing to do with sexual orientation. I'm not dissing transgenders but I know they can be bisexual and as I seem to recall, it's the pansexuals who are all onboard with gender, not that bisexuals can't be but we're talking semantics so it's sexes, not genders.

 

"Pansexual"----I now recall-last year-when Wayne Brady announced he was "pansexual"; I had not heard of this word prior to Wayne's announcing this---------"playing the field"----with both guys and gals------hey-if it is what floats yewr boat-----ENJOY the FULLEST!!!!!!!!!!

 

I have a female friend who lives in the wilds of Tennessee and she's pansexual and I was chatting with her and she kept saying the word and I asked her to define it for me. I still don't see how it's different from being bisexual except pansexuals are about the inclusion of transgenders and, well, they can be bisexual, too, so the inclusion of gender into the definition of bisexual is a difference which makes no difference. I despise inaccuracy; it makes being bisexual very hard for many to grasp and understand and it makes people look... unintelligent when they include it - while acting like they know what they're talking about - and it tells me that they're like lemmings and following along and spreading misinformation and I do everything I can to make people understand that gender isn't relevant to what it means to be , bisexual. I respect transgenders even though it's my person thought that they have a serious mental illness, and no one is looking at it like this because it is physically impossible for someone to be born into the wrong body. But I've been around enough gay men who honestly believe that they're really female because in their minds, they want to be female and... gender reassignment and unless they go to a foreign country, transgenders go through some deep shit before they're allowed to go from MTF or FTM including some serious psychological examinations.

I had a guy I used to work with disappear into thin air. We all thought that he got another job and just left for it without telling anyone. Come to find out a decade later, he was granted extra special leave so he could transition from male to female and she came back to work and I was like, "Okay, that explains much!" We had a special meeting because this new woman would be working closely with my team... and I was the only guy on the team so you can probably imagine how well this news did not go over well with the women on my team. The company stayed true to it's diversity policies and told everyone to either get on board with the program... or be immediately terminated.

My first one-on-one meeting with her was weird... because I knew the man she used to be and at the risk of being terminated on the spot, I did tell him that he was an ugly chick and worth of a paper bag... or five or ten and she said, "Oh, I know!" and we had a good laugh - then got down to the business at hand. She told me everything she had to go through to be allowed to officially be a woman in our society and I figured that the man he used to be wanted it really bad... because I wouldn't put myself through it. But I've always known that I'd make for a lousy girl.

Pansexuals don't impress me because they're just making shit up to make themselves comfortable with being bisexual. And I do not ever give any fucks about celebrities and their sexuality because unless they're gonna be sleeping with me, they ain't doing shit for me one way or the other since I established myself as a bisexual before these rich and famous jamokes were even born...

 

KDaddy23: Recall-not all that long ago-when sex change operations was a thing only to be found in Grade "B" science fiction flicks; personally "pansexual" tells this guy nothing (is a guy in a sexual relationship with Peter Pan-perhaps?)----so far as celebs go------you and I both know that-for the greater part-NO publicity is BAD to a celebrity; with a lot of celebs these days it's all nothing but "PUB" (Pure Unadulterated Bullshit)---------------------

 

I think I was in my early 20s when word on the street had it that a lot of trannies - transvestites - were going to Mexico and other countries to have sex change operations and some of them were dying or were badly botched. Guys were afraid of them pre-op and maybe even post-op because, even as I found out, they were getting their feelings confused and fooled; looks like girl, has that subliminal feel like girl, she has a dick to go with the boobs. As such, great violence and death were being foisted upon them and probably is still happening today. One such tranny I knew of still liked having sex with women despite waiting to be transformed and to me, well, I suppose it just made sense; in the process of becoming female, still very much male and the dick still works just fine. It made gender irrelevant for me as far as bisexuality is concerned because, duh, anyone - and regardless of how they see themselves - can be bisexual if it floats their boat.

"Pansexual" is a misnomer if it includes gender; it should be "pangender" to cover all genders, real and imagined but I guess "pangender" doesn't roll off the tongue all that nicely. Celebs are publicity hounds and some need something "earth shattering" to keep them in the limelight and announcing that they're bisexual will have the media all over it and trying to get to the bottom of things and like people like me really care if the celeb du jour is bi or not... unless we're going to have sex and I seriously doubt that.

 

KDaddy23: You hit the nail right on the head: celebrities are indeed blatant publicity hounds-and they will take it any way they can get it-sexually-related or otherwise---------

 

Sheesh! When did this get so complicated? I don’t spend much time on trying to label what I am. While my sexuality might be fluid, the vast majority of people I know and associate with would consider me a straight heterosexual male. And that’s fine, it’s the public life I live. There are a very few men that know me as a man who likes sex with both men and women. And there have been men who only know me as a man who has sex with them. Complete with kissing, naked in bed, getting fucked kind of sex. I think they would consider me gay. So what am I? As far as I’m concerned I’m sexual. I suppose circumstantially straight, and gay. I always considered that to be bisexual. Here’s what is important to me, I treat other people with kindness and respect. I don’t spend a lot of time with trying to pigeon hole things into categories.

 

Excellent response------treating others with KINDNESS and RESPECT is what it is all about; sexuality-race-religion------all redundant-when it all boils down to treating others as YOU yourself wish to be treated; we are ALL in this world TOGETHER------let's enjoy each other-care for each other-------and LEARN that sexuality-religion-race does NOT feature into what constitutes a GOOD person-----it is what's INSIDE that counts!

 

When did this get so complicated? When we made it that way. We weren't satisfied with the way we were defining sexuality; we had to start tossing it all aside in favor of what we think and what someone else thinks so, instead of clarity, we have mass confusion, label-hating, all kinds of stuff. While it's always about how we see ourselves, we cannot ignore the things that defines how we see ourselves. I'm bisexual; I've always been bisexual. I look and quack exactly like that duck. What someone else thinks I am is irrelevant since chances are they'd be wrong at the worst, inaccurate at the least. Don't ask me what I think I am; ask me what I know myself to be but, then again, I'm all about being less complicated in both thought and deed...

 

KDaddy 23: WELL said----indeed-it is not what we THINK we are-but rather-what we KNOW we are-----and offer no apologies to the naysayers who are too 'uptight" or just too plain ignorant to accept reality----

 

I'm with a guy who in his 20s like I was; I'm fucking him and he's deliciously tight and I'm liking the way my dick looks sliding in and out of his butt when he "ruins" the whole mood by saying, "Cum in me, daddy!" I was taken aback by him calling me daddy and found that he had, in his youth, wanted his daddy's cock but he wasn't going to get it and he said I was like his daddy because I was, technically, a year older than he was and, indeed, I was expecting my third child at the time. I would learn that for the men who truly had daddy issues, it didn't make a difference how old they were; any man who was giving them good dick was daddy.

 

There is a HUGE "daddy following" for sure these days-going by what is out on the 'net; older guys topping younger guys-----younger guys topping older guys------hell-it's all HOT!! Inter-generational guy-on-guy action is ALWAYS hot!!!!

 

"DFD"------"Daddies Fucking Daddies"

 

------realistically speaking-as long as a fellow is in reasonably good health-old age" should be NO deterrent to enjoying a fulfilling and satisfying sex life----despite the age of the participants!

 

Just as surely as there are (distasteful) stereotypes regarding sexual identities-there also stereotypes in relation to aging-------hurtful and ignorant in either context-------

 

Well said! BE YOURSELF------toss the labels into the trash where they belong-ENJOY your sex life-your desires-your turn-ons-----and let your partners treat YOU as YOU treat others!

 

I'm 55 but have always been attracted to older men. The guy who took my anal virginity when I was around 30 was in his mid-50s, and somehow most guys I've met have been older than me. My current fwb is 10 years my senior and I find the age difference a turn-on, but I've also been with guys my own age and it's usually good too. The oldest I've been with was in his 70s and that was great. I don't get that attracted to younger guys but I can see myself shifting my attentions to those my age or younger as the supply of willing and able tops 10 years older than me dwindles... I'm not really looking for a daddy but there is an element of dominance and submission in being with an older top, and that is part of the appeal for me. I also prefer older men's bodies, not into muscles and perfect bodies, daddy bods is more my style.

 

I'm 68 and-from my teens on-have always found older guys far more sexy than a lot of younger guys; buff "pretty boy"-types never did it for me; an older guy (my age or older) with a hairy body and a nice round meaty butt is what gets me hot "under the collar"...........

 

For "fun" I used to really enjoy browsing through all the photos of hot older men on the "silverdaddies" site; there were quite a few senior daddies on that site that put a slew of younger guys to shame (always thought the idea of younger tops/older bottoms was just as hot as older tops/younger bottoms)-----

 

Some guy wanted me to call him daddy and I told him, "My father's dead and you ain't old enough..." I know guys like to roleplay this daddy thing but, nah, not me. The whole younger/older thing is lost on me because in any event, there are working dicks, their owners are, hopefully, old enough to legally consent to sex, are healthy enough to be having sex and, also hopefully, aren't my idea of an asshole.