Left-wing fascism

Yeah I have trouble seeing academia as the enemy. In the USA, anti-intellectualism is the problem.

 

A quarter of their students still claim the sun revolves around the earth, and they refuse to openly discuss the issue. Noam Chomsky is a linguist, who surrounds himself with militant atheists, who could not teach a child how to use a dictionary if their lives depended on it. There's simply no such thing anymore as objective science, just ask the democratic party.

 

Anti-Wall Street, who are attempting to automate academia out of a job, along with Disney and the Muppets. If academia had any balls whatsoever, they would investigate why their own students are storming the palace with knives and pitch forks, and can't even use a stupid dictionary.

Wall Street is killing America, which of course, is now dominated by the Tea Party. It's a sad day when you could not care less whether the Chinese or the Tea Party wins WWIII, and the only thing the democrats care to talk about is money.

Anti-Intellectualism is swallowing all the crap they shovel down our throats, without question.

 

When I call that furr

When I use the term "Fascist", I don't mean it as an invective, but a noun; one which has a clear definition based upon a collection of readily observable common characteristics.

When I call that furry quadruped mammal sleeping in the corner over there a "dog", you and I understand each other because through common language and assent we both agree that the word "dog" in colloquial use refers to domesticated canids. We can now discuss the characteristics and relative merits of different breeds of dogs and understand each other adequately.
If however you insist that the creature is in fact a coconut because it's brown, has hair, and produces milk, we have no basis for meaningful conversation. That is not a difference of opinion, you're simply wrong.

Similarly, if you're going to tell me that Liberals are Nazis because:

A: Nazism was officially called National Socialism.
B: As everyone who watches Fox News knows, all Liberals are Socialist.
C: Ergo, all Liberals are Nazis

That's not simply a difference of opinion, you're wrong; egregiously so, your statement so profoundly ignorant and your reasoning so mind-numbingly specious that anything else coming out of your mouth is automatically suspect, wrong to the point that until you receive tuition sufficient to accurately differentiate between Fascism, Socialism, Communism, Capitalism, Liberalism and Conservativism, there is really no further point to trying to engage with you in any meaningful conversation. It would be akin to trying to hold a discussion with a toddler, or a psychotic. There's no value in engaging in a battle of wits with someone who's so demonstrably unarmed.

 

Yes, War is Peace too.
Cool, let's all get Orwellian!

The poorly educated just don't know the actual meanings of words. So it's easy for the media to redefine terms.

In fact the word "hippie" was given a negative media spin precisely so people would not want to associate with one or have one in the family, lol. They were too afraid to let hippies be influencers. So I wrote a book, and created a website to set that record straight. It influenced a generation, so there! And you're here now...

 

The entire population makes up words, and over half of them create their own definitions for words in the dictionary, while conservatives carefully censor half of reality. It's not the mass media, its the taboo against sharing your words and playing nice, certainly not in public! Militant Atheists have supported conservatives, by trashing out the dictionary and any attempts for people who don't agree with them to communicate online. In other words, they use the same approach as conservatives, of censoring half of reality if given a chance. It's not the exact words you use, but how you use them that they all hate and refuse to discuss.

Academia promotes ignorance, by censoring any criticism of them. Militant Atheists have been working for conservatives, and conservatives make sure nobody ever talks about in the mass media. If academia had their way, they would enforce whatever definitions and words they want, because the lawyers and bankers all demand it. These days, words are meaningless, unless you have the cash to buy the legal system.

If the US were not always importing the brightest minds on the planet, we'd already be a third world country.

 

Exactly which half of reality is being censored by whom? Such vague utterances are meaningless. Is your aim to confuse, distort or divide, or all of the above?

You throw around meaningless terms that only you define. Thus making it difficult to follow your wandering train of thought. I suppose we're to impose our own meanings to your statements if that's even possible at times.

 

Bullshit. Even the President is criticizing them. There's lots to criticize about academia, but ignorance isn't one unless you went to a Christian college. Then it makes sense, unlike you much of the time.

See, I imposed my meaning on your statement. Your statements require more refinement so we don't have to guess or makeup what you mean.

 

Now please name some "militant atheists" so we can understand your statement. And what are they doing to support conservatives?

Are you diverting attention from all the right-wing Christian Churches that have funneled billions to conservatives for as long as I've been on this planet?

 

I've written over 200 pages on the subject, only to be censored. The entire population of the US is suffering Stockholm Syndrome, and you can rank our politicians according to how corrupt they are simply by measuring their brain damage. These are just some the harder to hide facts, yet they tried to hide them for as long as they could, and both democrats and republicans are playing around with censoring half of reality, for fun and for profit. For the last forty years, they've been carefully censoring the fact there is no theory of everything, and all the giant machines are largely worthless, because they were manipulating the stock market, building up to the current push for AI and quantum computing. Thankfully, they are hitting the end of their rope, and Neo-Nazi bullshit just isn't going to cut it anymore.

Not with China breathing down their necks, and the rest of the world already ready to disown the US.

 

Noam Chomsky. A radical left wing linguist, who surrounds himself with militant atheists, who could not teach a child how to use a dictionary if their lives depended on it. OpenAI Sam Alman is another militant atheist, working for Wall Street which is dominated by the Tea Party, and who swears his own machines will kill us all.

Sadly, both communists and capitalists, use a lot of the same rhetoric, because actually working with people are not what they specialize in. The taboo against sharing your words and playing nice, is why even Disney and the Muppets aren't safe, and the entire younger generation now has all the decision making capacity of chickens which, of course, they blame on the mass media.

 

They are censoring who gets to criticize who about what. Donald Duck can say anything he wants, because he can afford the best judges. You either cough up the cash, or get stomped on. The idea conservatives give a crap about even their own values is a joke in bad taste, its all about the money.

We had a sort of functional judicial system for a while, but there's nobody in charge around here.

 

Yeah... well David Crosby, ex-Byrd, could be a jerk but he said something brilliant, something like, "You know, in retrospect, everything we hippies were saying in the 70s has turned out to be correct." Yep.

 

The norm in academia is constant criticism! What do you think is peer review? Write a paper and everyone in the field jumps your case, every point is argued, and it's a good thing, because thereby one approaches truth more closely, by tending to all objections and shortcomings in the theory/fact being attested.

I can think of plenty of criticisms of academia, hell I went to UCLA ok, but you throw out the baby with the bath.

 

I saw Glenn Beck when he was still on Faux News make the very argument you lampoon here! Hilarious! They actually sell that to their minions.

 

I don't see how Noam Chompsky is helping conservatives, other than being a foil for them to scapegoat, as you are doing now. I have no problem with him, and I don't see him being censored, just not part of mainstream media. It would be helpful if more people , including myself read his work.

Sam Altman, being a billionaire is doing what all the other billionaires are doing cause they're all so conformist and competitive. So in this case the fact that he's an atheist is only relevant to hard-line religious nuts.

 

The norm in academia is a well known phenomena, known as Stockholm Syndrome. They have the lowest reproductive rates, are still infamous for sexism, and are workaholics.

Clowns that don't make noise, don't get paid. Scientific Positivism is a complex oxymoron, and doesn't even fit it's own definition for a valid philosophy, yet nobody will criticize it. Very much like Chomsky, they are "Untouchable" and "Unreproachable" after 80 years. Among other things, my hope is to use AI to prove countless institutions just like them, all fit their own definitions for a cult. The Cult of Aristotle, still living in the Dark Ages. They are the source of the Tea Party.