okay soo.. I've been thinking about the 9-11 incident & I really do believe the government had everything to do with it. I mean I don't believe everything I hear but theres sooo much visual & documented proof!! Its crazy! Well... what does everyone think? Speak your mind.
Familiar with Maddox? This pretty much sums it up... http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=911_morons
That's an interesting thought, you may well be on to something. I'm not sure anyone else has ever considered it before.
Yes, 9/11 was indeed an inside job. The official story has holes in it the size of the Titanic. Not necessarilly by "the government" but key players would have deffinatley been in high office.
Yeah, I believe it. I have seen a few things here and there claiming this very thing. Examples being the way some of the buildings fell. They said they fell like a controlled explosion, not like they had been struck by a plane. One of the towers fell in layers, vertically strait down in such way. Scientistic said it was impossible for this to happen unless it had been detonated with such method. In fact, tower 7 only fell because of debris from another collision. Again, it is nigh on impossible to bring a building of that size by a surplus of rock, dust and metal. The government is to blame. Or if they didn't do it, they were probably in pretty formal, yet benevolent talks with those who did.
On a tv show de-bunking the de-bunkers it showed a 3-d view of bldg 7. It had one I-beam that held the entire building up. Then it was lined with diesel tanks as their fuel source for heating. The office fires ignited the diesel tanks. From the falling debris. Melted the I-beam.
I don't believe the hype. This tv show had come backs for everything... they wanted to confront. I would like to see this show again because I consider all sides of the story. I personally think flight 93 was supposed to hit bldg 7. Then we wouldn't have had to wait until 5 pm for it to fall.
office fires melted I-beam... wow at least jet fuel had some merit. thats total bs i swear. just too many irregularities in the official story.
I am somewhat new to all this computer stuff but there is a photo of one of the columns at ground zero severed at a 45 degree angle, exactly how detanators are strapped to load bearing members so the building can fall. Once im more computer savvy i hope to put up a photo of this. I used to have a picture of it on my phone from taking a shot of my tv and showed it to people at work, one guy said "they cut it with a torch".I only mentioned the I-beam spine theory because it is so bad its almost laughable. C'mon, one I-beam.http://www.bcrevolution.ca/thermite_evidence.htm has photo
the conspiracy wasn't in the mechanics of how the buildings were taken down. towers one and two could have been and probably were the result of the airplanes. building 7 MAY have had a self destruct system to protect the security of documents stored there, but this is really of no pertinence. the conspiracy factor is in how ben lauden was 'created'. the creation and funding of al-cia-da and the windows of opportunity and motivations for the exercise being carried out. and the motivations FOR doing all of that. when raygun effectively destroyed the fear potential of 'the russians are comming the russians are comming' the 'political right' looked arround for a replacement for it. the so called war of terrorism is that replacement. and the events of 11-sep-2001 were the implimentation of that replacing. rumsfield's hand was up bin laudens ass all the way to the elbow from the very beginning.
to sum it up it was the transsion of the Military Industrial Complex into the Terrorism Industrial Complex