Please take the time to watch this excellent video if you haven't already. It is the best 9/11 video I have seen to date, and it does an excellent job proving the towers and WTC 7 were brought down in controlled demolitions: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6708190071483512003&q=911+mysteries&hl=en This is far better than 'Loose Change', IMO.
That movie provides no scientific evidence and uses suggestion to imply things that are simply not proven. BTW, is there an echo in here?
Does the official story provide any scientific evidence? Even the steel was shipped away before it could be tested.
here is a synopsis of what we had discussed. Don't you think this statement is a little misleading? Let's look at the first sentence. "Every single piece of steel from the scene was shipped off to China aqap? How quick exactly is aqap? Quick enough that SEI/ASCE teams had unlimited access to the WTC site for six days and was granted use of FEMA's Regional Operation Center on a 24/7 basis? Quick enough where these investigation teams were allowed access to debris at Fresh Kills Staten Island Landfill and two recycling yards in New Jersey, where samples of structural steel were obtained and have since been subjected to labratory analysis? http://www.house.gov/science/hearings/full02/mar06/corley.htm Another misleading statement. A more accurate statement would have been..... "To control theft, the nearly 200 trucks used to haul away steel from the WTC site were equipped with GPS devices so that their movements of this cargo could be tracked. This is in the wake of an investigation by the New York Police and the FBI of the theft of over 250 tons of steel, estimated at a value of roughly $17,500. One driver involved in the clean up operation was subsequently dismissed simply for taking an extended lunch break." A statement like this still gets the point of the story across, that the steel was being tracked via GPS, but also explains why. Here are some snippets discussing the security of the cleanup site. The New York Police and FBI are investigating the theft of over 250 tons of steel from the remains of the collapsed WTC towers. Apparently, the steel was hauled away by trucks involved in the official clear-up operation (see September 12-October 2001), but instead of being taken to Fresh Kills—the FBI-controlled dump on Staten Island where it was intended to go—the steel was driven to three independently-owned scrapyards, two in New Jersey and one on Long Island. The London Telegraph says the scrap metal value of the stolen steel would have been roughly $17,500. Investigators believe the theft was organized by one of New York’s Mafia families. [Daily Telegraph, 9/29/2001] Consequently, on November 26, 2001, the city initiates use of an in-vehicle Global Positioning System (GPS), to monitor the locations of nearly 200 trucks removing steel from the WTC collapse site, at a cost of $1,000 per unit. This system sends out alerts if any truck travels off course or arrives late at its destination. One driver involved with the clear-up operation is subsequently dismissed simply for taking an extended lunch break. [Access Control and Security Systems, 7/2002] The way you try and prevent evidence is in the same manner that most "conspiracy theorists" do. While not outright lying, you present fractions of statements, use implied wording, and give vague explanations. People that are simple minded or are too lazy to really find out what is going on are succeptable to believing information when it is presented this way. I do not know if this is something you learned in an attempt to spread your propaganda, or just subconciously picked up from reading material from CT sources. This is why CT believe they have evidence proving their theories, but when disected, most if not all is easily refuted. This is why absolutely no credible media sources have presented "9/11 Truth" information, because it simply does not hold water. This is the method Michael Moore uses to spread his deceit.
Whacky Iraq what is your purpose here disproving objective evidence against the 911 official story. I mean, at first it seemed like you were just objective, but now it seems like it's your JOB, i am very sketched about you and your purpose here whacky...
Who is really the simple minded one here? The one that believes what the government wants them too? Or would it be someone who is willing to think for themselves?
Well whacky would think that if you question the government you are unamerican and a horrible person. But I would say someone willing to think for themselves.
I would say you should absolutely question your government. Question everything. If something doesn't make sense, question it. If something makes too much sense, question it.
You, if you cannot see the clarity in my post. What exactly does not make sense about the post? AHH said that "they took every single piece of steel from the scene and shipped it off to China as quick as possible" This is absolutely not true. It is not just what the US government wants me to believe, it is the truth. It is reality. He also said that "most pieces were equipped with global positioning mechanisms and one truck driver who was transporting some of it stopped to buy a sandwich and was FIRED." While there is a shred of truth to this statement, it clearly is not posted in a way to convey what the actual situation was. The way in which he said that was to imply that most of the steel was being tracked so that it was sure to be trucked away and destroyed before it could be tested (some assumption on my behalf, please explain if there is a misunderstanding). The truth is that the trucks transporting the steel were being tracked due to a problem with the theft of the steel because of its quantity and salvage value. The driver was terminated because he had taken a longer than authorized lunch break. Truth is truth. Fact is fact. Some can be found through research, some can be found through experience.
Keep drinking the kool-aid people. When you are using your national ID card on a daily basis we'll see who was being paranoid and who saw what our government was up to well in advance.
Exactly. And what is worse is when people believe these lunatic fringe videos that are out there claiming unproven events. The media tends to have some credibility, but some of these talk radio conspiracy website produced videos are pathetic.
let's talk about the internal fires in these buildings. building 7 supposedly collapsed because of an internal fire. what interests me is that if this were true, it would make building 7 the third in history to collapse for this reason. any guess as to the 1st and 2nd buildings to suffer a similar unrealistic demise?
Even If our government is responsible for the events of 9/11, to gain absolute power and control over it's citizenry, and to feed the insatiable appetite of military industrial complex, what can we as mere pawns do in the game of high stakes poker. While some believe "absolute power corrupts, absolutely" unfortunately for us it's "absolute power, attracts the corruptible, absolutely" Hotwater
