Another teacher molests student, gets off

RE: http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/11/22/teacher.sex/index.html

Blonde. Pretty. Female. Sorry to drag you into court, miss.

 

yeah, that is totally unprofessional, but the teacher and the boy had sex three times. Doesn't sound like he didn't want it, so could it really be considered molestation if he was probably enjoying it? They had sex in a car, for goodness sakes. That doesn't sound like any coinicidence that they happen to be together riding in a car....

 

How do you know she GOT OFF?

 

uhh I don't see what the fuck is wrong with givin a kid some puss

what the fuck did the kid report her for? fuckin' psycho lil fag

 

RE: Doesn't sound like he didn't want it, so could it really be considered molestation if he was probably enjoying it?

Noone asks this question if it's a guy and a female student. They just set his beaten corpse on fire (and rightly so)

 

we all know it isnt fair. although i wish a bitch that hot molested me at 15, now and in 15 years...

 

Okay, no problem. We can do that to the she-techers too. That way BOTH genders can be treated unfairly and we won't have a double standard.

 

RE: Okay, no problem. We can do that to the she-techers too. That way BOTH genders can be treated unfairly

You mean, "fairly"

 

young dudes want sex

 

How is this unfair? HE wanted sex. HE got sex. Isn't wasn't even on school property. It is understandable that the teacher would get in trouble. But Why does the student not get in trouble. He was consiously having sex with a teacher, and he does not get as much as a detention.

Of course, this is all assuming the worst for the student, that he had sex for the sake of sex then reported the teacher for no reason, and even this is assuming that he was the one who reported. Now, if he truly felt taken advantage of, it would be fair for him to report and the teacher be punished. However we do not know whether he felt this way or not. So, the fair thing to do would be yes, punish the teacher and assume that yes, the student felt taken advantage of. So this should happen to that teacher. HOWEVER if we knew perfectly well that the student willingly agreed to the sex and felt no regrets, no matter the gender of the teacher, there would really be no reason to punish the teacher except for unprofessional conduct. However, since we are not mind readers, and the student reported, we must assume that he DID feel molested and that the teacher is at fault for molestation. So, I agree with you on the fact that the teacher should be punished, but due to the sexual history between the teacher and the student, its kinda hard to beleive it was molestation.

 

and the teacher WAS punished. 3 years house arrest, 7 years of probation. and she is now registered as a sex offender. I would like to see her try to get another teaching job now.

 

RE: and the teacher WAS punished. 3 years house arrest, 7 years of probation. and she is now registered as a sex offender. I would like to see her try to get another teaching job now.

It'll happen.

 

RE: However we do not know whether he felt this way or not

It's not about how he feels. It's against the law to have sex with a child.

 

That is why it is against the law, because other wise the adult would say it was consensual sex, hence it would not be considered molestation. However, if was consensual sex, why should that be against the law? Yes I know that a teenager's brain is not fully developed so he's not on par with an adult, hence not making them a good match for sex, but a teenager is still capable of making desicions, so shouldn't they allowed to do so? Yes, I understand that it is the law, this is totally illegal, but to me, the law does not make sense.

 

hey! the "cool mom" gets 30 years, the pretty chick gets 6 months. i think it's more a prejudice in looks than sex. i noticed when my ex got a ridiculous sentence. he was so suave and charming, it sickened me. and the judge just ate it up. but i was never able to enjoy his oozing charm ever again.

 

ah ha!! this arcticle explains it much better: http://today.reuters.com/news/newsa...Z_01_HAR352581_RTRUKOC_0_US-CRIME-TEACHER.xml

"She must enter a sexual offender treatment program and cannot have any unsupervised contact with children."

No, she will not be able to get a teaching job.

"After the boy's parents found out he was having sex with LaFave, they allowed police to tape telephone calls between the two, which led to her arrest."

The boy did not report her. The parents did, and I understand that because they wanted to protect him.

"LaFave's attorney, John Fitzgibbons, made headlines in July when he said his client was too pretty to survive prison. "To place an attractive young woman in that kind of hell-hole is like placing a piece of raw meat in with the lions," he said then."

Holy crap!! Okay, IronGoth, I can now understand what you were trying to get at.... I'm gonna eat my hat now....

 

The reason the body didn't get in trouble with the law (I'm sure his parents have something for him) is because he could (assuming Flordia state law is the same as the law here, or about) have sex legally, and nobody would blame him anyway because is not an adult and its any easy defence to say he is immature and didn't know what he was doing.

He probably did know what he was doing, but the point of having a system where people under 18 are minors is they aren't adults and aren't tried as adults... even though there is great difference in each individuals maturity level.

The system is look biased... I wouldn't call it sexism, because both genders serve on jurys now. The jurors might be sexist, but they don't care about that kind of thing. Sexism, racism, they just let it happen, even if they know that it happens. Like for example: blacks are executed 4.3 times more often than whites, because of racist jurys, but they wont do anything about it.

So once they make the death penalty illegal (might take some time), then they might start fixing this bullshit...

or they could just fix racism and be completely ignorant. We'll see.

 

She's an attractive woman. Can't she get some ass somewhere outside the classroom?

 

if the student was underage then he wouldn't be held accountable, it would be rape and child molestation. the teacher overstepped his boundaries and should be fired and arrested. i was a rape counselor and those were the guidelines we went by.
hippiewise angel

 

Whether the student wanted it or not, it's still considered child rape and still against the law... and teacher's shouldn't take advantage of their students that way, either. It looks bad all around.