the problem starts with you trying to make the reader of your posts imagine unimaginable things. to interpret something i need my imagination. how can i interpret something that is like you say unimaginable. if with unimaginable you mean unknown then there is possibly more clarity, but that's simply not what you wrote. EDIT: what's going on here. i didn't start this thread. whoever deleted the other posts might as well delete mine
I'd like to revive this thread, just to say that, yeah, can the next person to make an "unimaginable god" argument please explain to me how they are able to imagine it?
Is the idea that it's something you have to experience? Because if that were the case, surely it'd be easy enough to just say that. Pretty much any time someone makes the argument it comes in the form of 3 or 4 consecutive tl;dr posts with lots of convoluted poorly constructed sentences that really don't tell you anything. So yeah, that's my decree: if God has to be experienced to be imagined, PLEASE leave us alone in the meantime. When we have experienced God, we'll call you!