Bush Administration Censoring American Scientists!

Amerika a Free Country? Only in our memory.

 

precisely why I hate this admin; any sensible scientist would.
they are an enemy of progression, and adaptation.

I'd venture it has something to do with all the loosening of corporate pollution restrictions Bushco has authorized during his two terms, with help from the oil barons.

this is exactly why I hate neo-cons, and the mindless idiots who support them.

 

Thanks, Skip.

Now my day is ruined.

...fuckin' Bush-ed, again...

 

The tax which will be paid for [the] purpose [of education] is not more than the thousandth part of what will be paid to kings, priests and nobles who will rise up among us if we leave the people in ignorance.
--Thomas Jefferson to George Wythe, 1786.

This is not surprising because most of the right wing/religious right and the people that it manipulates and deceive believe science is evil.

 

The correct title of this thread should be "Government censors government scientists".

 

The government doesn't run itself. The government is only good as the people that operate it and support it.

 

Yes, actually, that would have been more accurate, and it would have been making exactly the same point I am making.

Bush is not censoring all scientists, he is censoring government scientists. I'm anti big government. My point is that of course government will censor government scientists. Did you trust the government before Bush came along? Did you trust government scientists before? I didn't.

 

what's the lobbyist agenda that the admin would like to silence? Operation Tree Hug?

give me a break..

seriously, what does it matter , if they're contracted scientists, independent scientists, or EPA?

Global warming is a very REAL issue, and it just seems this admin doesn't want to hear the verdict of the repercussions for their f'ed up policies. Bush made it a point to be more lenient on corporate pollution restrictions; yay, consumers are spending more, buying more gas-guzzling POS's, our economy is doing great! The environment? oh, we won't worry about that now, we'll let the next guy in office address it...

very irresponsible policy-making, just to make extra bucks.

the field of science is called green chemistry (nanochem is also involved), and if Bush had any fucking sense, he'd quit squandering our money and seriously support the research, the hell with Mars. we need to stop shitting where we eat.

[sorry for my tone, skip; this issue particularly angers me, I've been monitoring Bush's environmental policies since 2001, and it's one of the main reasons I truly loathe him]

 

I think you just make stuff up Skip........


http://www.state.gov/g/oes/climate/
http://www.gcrio.org/index.html
http://www.usgcrp.gov/usgcrp/nacc/default.htm
http://www.usgcrp.gov/


http://yosemite.epa.gov/oar/globalwarming.nsf/content/
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/2023835.stm
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/02/climatechange.html
and so on....

 

The Bush administration did a nice job of rewording the EPA report after 911 to make it look like the air was safe. The White House has no business tampering with reports of another agency.

.

 

we are free as long as we are not on the way of our government
then what's the use of this "way"

sadly, that's just where i wanna be

 

Moreover, Bush had the audacity to look America in the face right after 911 and tell people 'we don't need an investigation'. Every person in the country should have been outraged over that suppression of information. It shows what a sick bastard Bush really is.

.

 

Clearly some of the initial statements left unanswered questions, and this is potential danger in an emergency. Unknowns lead to rumors and can lead to hysteria. The White House CEQ took the "What does that mean?" out of the EPA's words and replaced them with definitive judgements based on all data.


http://www.slantpoint.com/mt-arx/2003/08/bad_air_hillary.php

is this true ?

 

Lie ??

This is what you said:

''The Bush Administration has been actively monitoring every word published by government scientists, ensuring that their reports not mention Global Warming or Climate Change.''

Is that true ???

NO.

Thats as simple as my point gets..but i think it covers everything.

Am i 'lieing' or are you ?..

It is remarkable that you can even post such things and claim that I am lieing.. thinking about it lieing about what exactly ?.

No.. i work with 'climate change global warming US EPA policy' and a little known search engine called 'Google'..

You should attempt to use it now and again..you would be amazed at what you find out.

http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=%27climate+change+global+warming+US+EPA+policy%27&ei=UTF-8&fr=FP-tab-web-t&x=wrt

 

Yes, the air was 'safe', alright. In light of 911, makes one ponder what exactly it would it take for the Bush administration to declare air to be unsafe. Let's all tamper with the EPA report and reassure the public when we don't have data telling us it's safe.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4904188.stm

So now let's all apologize for Bush once again. He was wrong about this one too, but people make mistakes, right? Much the same with the Iraq 'intelligence'. And Katrina.

Don't do anything that might make people concerned. Much like the case of tampering with the EPA report so as to not scare people, just sit there at a gradeschool while 3000 people died because you might scare the little kids if you left. It's all a testament to just how warped Bush logic really is.

.