Can someone help me identify this?

***NOTE: If you click on the url link you can see some shots in Macro***

http://img237.imageshack.us/img237/6084/55303885fw3.jpg

http://img244.imageshack.us/img244/2782/82114161gg9.jpg

http://img244.imageshack.us/img244/9668/39118868si7.jpg

http://img403.imageshack.us/img403/4944/4chb9.jpg

http://img137.imageshack.us/img137/5065/5cwm1.jpg

http://img261.imageshack.us/img261/5960/92474645zu7.jpg

http://img261.imageshack.us/img261/2623/35187744ks1.jpg

http://img145.imageshack.us/img145/1074/63678551zj6.jpg
***NOTE: If you click on the url link you can see some shots in Macro***

Is it good or bad? And what exactly is it? And how much would you pay for it?

Thanks in advance!

(Sorry for double posting for those who notice, since the other thread is an old one being updated I wasn't sure how many would go in it)

 

Looks like pot man!

 

at first I thought it was pot, but have a close look I think it maybe hemp no trichomes .I wouldn't pay 2cents for it, I could be wrong or not

 

its got the mark of the beast.

 

looks like shitty commercial to me

 

yum..

 

Honestly, to me it looks like some schwagg, and not even good schwagg. At most, I'd pay 90 bucks an O, and thats if I was desperate for pot and not able to find anything else. Otherwise, I'd pass it up totally.

 

not that i thik this looks like schwag, because i think its beasters, but would you seriously pay $90 on ounce for schwag?

 

So I'm confused as to why I'm getting some "it's good" and some "it's sh!t". I'm a n00b.

Can someone explain more?

 

different people in different places have different opinions on whats good and whats not, it basically depends on the quality your used to.

 

it looks about the same as shit I get for 65 an o. Not good, but definately marijuana. Actually looking back at the pics I notice a lot of leaves. That's not very common (at least around here) and I would inquire as to why it has so many. Someone near the top of the chain isn't manicuring the shit right and that's not good to smoke, plus leaves have less thc in them, so you get less high from smoking them.

 

eh...mids

 

Because it is a picture.

Honestly. it looks like someone cut a stalk from a field and dried it. Pressed wet and not even trimmed.

But that being said you have to smoke it and judge it yourself. Does the ash come out white or black? White is good means it was flushed. Does it snap and sparkle when burned - nitrates not flushed out. Does it get you high? Smoke a alot or a little.

As far as prices, we are scatterred all over the earth and one's need may not be the same as anothers. Market demand and such flatulence

 

I thought it was dank because some of it had a lighter color but some was dark. I figured even if it was dark it was still good cuz it sort of looked like some chronic I had before (Grade A shit). Also, when I'd smoke in a bong it wouldn't necessary get cashed so much as the bowl would become clogged and the weed turned into a sticky resiny ball and that resiny ball did burn white. The rest burns black. The chronic used to get snow white. Also it didn't have any seeds.

and wow thanks for that tip what an awesome thing to know.

 

id smoke it. weed is weed.

if it was free for me i wouldent give two shits.

 

low grade mids. 90-120 a zip.

better than schwagg, worse than beasters or even worse than ok mids. Looks bad...

 

Note this part:

 

It is DEFINETLY pot (obviously). I mean you can send it to me...I can smoke it...and tell you the same thing lol I'd pay 40 1/4...after I smoked a J with you to see how high it got me...it's like test driving a car

 

schwiggity.
no mids. i don't think there's such a thing as mids.
it's either dank bud or it's SCHWAG.
and don't even try to give me the latter or i'll beat yo ass!
or i'll just completely pass it up.

 

lol