could these be Trichocereus pachanoi? (san pedro)

Discussion in 'Cacti Delecti' started by sbann, May 28, 2010.

  1. sbann

    sbann Guest

    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    there is a ton of cactus's around my area that look very similar to Trichocereus pachanoi, but im not sure.
    today i took a few photos of some i thought might be to get a opinion, think any of these might be?

    1
    [​IMG]
    2
    [​IMG]
    3
    [​IMG]
    4
    [​IMG]
     
  2. sbann

    sbann Guest

    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    bridgesii; cuzcoensis; fulvinanus; pachanoi; peruvianus; macrogonus; taquimbalensis; terscheckii; validus; werdermannianus??
     
  3. deleted

    deleted Visitor

    only one way to find out... cut that mother fucker111
     
  4. guerillabedlam

    guerillabedlam _|=|-|=|_

    Messages:
    29,419
    Likes Received:
    6,307
    1 is the only one of those that looks remotely like t. Pachanoi and I can't tell for sure but I don't think it is.
     
  5. RooRshack

    RooRshack On Sabbatical

    Messages:
    11,036
    Likes Received:
    551
    Never studied or used san p. myself, but those don't look like it from the pictures I've casually come upon.

    But the tall one that you fit all of in the picture frame looks badass, especially the tallest part.
     
  6. Ancient One

    Ancient One Member

    Messages:
    388
    Likes Received:
    0
    2,3,and 4 are not alkaline bearing, although called "trichocereas cacti". Pic 1 is amiguously dark and distant, but not San Pedro...
     
  7. PB_Smith

    PB_Smith Huh? What? Who, me?

    Messages:
    3,822
    Likes Received:
    6
    spines are too big and the ribbing too deep.
    not SP
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice