Environ-mentalism: A New Religion for a New Age (VIDEO)

This is my newest video that I just uploaded to the web minutes ago. It deals with environmentalism and its role in the move toward a completely new way of living, which will be anything but pleasant.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYl4hkFRdTk

 

anything but pleasant is right. I wish there was something we could actually do but the world is already set in its agenda. Just like they said "The threat of environmental crisis will be the international disaster key that will unlock the New World Order." - So true I also liked Maurice Strongs quote about substainable lifestyles because the time that we have left is so limited. Im also interested in these "habitat areas".

 

When you see these kind of unbelievably elaborate plans and how well they are going for them, you have to doubt that there is any way of stopping this. It seems so hopeless.

 

can you show me that UN plan it speaks of that talks about the 'habitat cities'?

 

If you read through 'Agenda 21', which is available online, it's all laid out in there. You can Google it.

 

Love man, we stop it through love, the 60's were controlled by them, eh? well that explains how it failed, a world wide peace movement shoudl stop these guys, ignore them and they have no power

 

Agenda 21's Human Settlements section
http://www.sovereignty.net/p/sd/a21/a21_07.txt

which speaks nothing of habitat cities (which were also found nowhere else in the document using Firefox's 'find' feature)


the plan speaks mostly of stuff that should happen between the years of 19993 and 2000, that certainly did not in many cities across the U.S. (such as sustaining jobs for all within urban environments)

 

I never said "habitat cities." I said "habitat areas," which are also sometimes referred to as "compact cities" or simply just "habitats" (ie. UN-Habitat). I never said that was the exact terminology that is in Agenda 21, though it is referred to as this by people at the UN and proponents of A21. If you would have read Agenda 21, you might have a better understanding of it. At the same time, you have to know what you're reading and what the agenda is, because it might seem rather innocuous to a person who isn't in the know. They have to sell it to the public in a way that seems as it's of benefit to them, but anyone who is versed in Orwellian double-speak knows this is almost never the case. You never hear wars given names like "Operation Iraqi Slaughter." Instead they're given Orwellian names like "Operation Iraqi Freedom" and "Enduring Freedom". We're told we must sacrifice freedom for safety in order to stop those "evil doers" that want to do us harm. Many people believe this because they only see things at face value.

 

Ok, first of all, i dont really see any evil in much of what your video claimed...

I agree the sterilization thing would be awful, how unnatural...there is another way, but they hide it. And overpopulation is real, so why it was in quotation marks i dont know. nless yu can explain to me why it is not real?

The taking away of private vehicles does not seem scary or unreasonable to me at all. Call me what you will

The age of aquarius thing shocked me, for as you should know, aquarius is about reform and uncovering past falsehoods and in many interpretations, truth and the unveiling of that truth, the pouring of wisdom, humanitarianism, etc...im sure you know all this. I dont think a religion like christianity is quite the age of aquarius' style, but hey, im open to possibility.

The rest of your claims are NOT BACKED UP. You give very little evidence. Theyll push us into "habitat areas"? Maybe youre onto something but at least give more evidence for your claims

Im an open-minded sort, and i dont mean to say youre wrong. What im saying is it sounds a little far-fetched...I dont see how "environmentalism", which i take to mean caring for the planet, protecting wildlife and limiting artificial chemicals put into our air, equals an agenda to kill a load of people for no apparent reason and gain power to do all kinds of evil things. Theres just no evidence for that at the moment. At the moment, the evidence is saying leaders dont give a crap about the environment...and frankly, without more evidence, the people featured in your video dont seem too threatening

Im not sure what else to say other than id like to hear more substantial stuff from you to explain your theories, as i am genuinely interested. As it is i really cant see what youre getting at...and i wont be stopping campaigns for people to drive less, and doing my bit

 

I realise this post applies to me also, so let me answer it too, as i am not "in the know"

Your example of how they dress these things up is "operation iraqi freedom"...but anyone with half a brain cell could see the whole thing was wrong. Like uhhh oh yeah killing for material gain is wrong, and this thing looks like an invasion. Right? People with brains can tell right from wrong...i dont see any wrong whatsoever in people who care for the environment

Anyway, im obviously not clued up on this stuff, and id appreciate anything you have to teach me. Ill look into it all further

 

^ you dont see anything wrong whatsoever in people who care for the environment?

 

What i meant was i see no wrong in caring for the environment
Please dont be picky here, im very ill at the moment, but i ried ym best o explain
Im sure it was obvious i didnt see environmentalists as some kind of wrong-free angels. Much more likely i found the actual caring not wrong

 

^ ahh ok, I thought you meant like...the government was caring for the environment....hehe hope you get well by the way.

 

Thanx lots Ill get there

 

Verseau,

There is a reason I posted the video in here and not another forum (ie. the Environment forum). I don't expect everyone who watches my video to know what I am talking about, but rather those who are slightly more aware of what's going on in the world, beyond what they're told on TV. The purpose of my video isn't to explain things in exquisite detail, as that would take much more than the 10 minutes alloted on YouTube. My goal is to get people thinking and doing their own research -- people who are already in the process of waking up from the dream world they call reality. My video simply is to point them in the right direction.

The video isn't to shun the idea of caring for the environment, but to shun those near the top who use environmentalism to forward their own agendas, which have nothing to do with the environment at all.

 

I did read it (that section I linked you to anyways)
as I recall, it doesn't really say shit about any designated areas or land even, whatsoever, are you sure you read it?


all it really talked about is making sure everyone is provided with adaquete living environments, employment oppurtunities, and food in urban environments (usually stating in 1993-2000)
it's an old plan that was purely for show, hasn't affected much, and never will

 

Believe what you want. Do you think I care?

 

^ if you truly think that the world is just about doomed unless everyone believes these ridiculous theories and cause some sort've revolution, then you should..

 

No, I can accept the fact that some people are not worth trying to wake up because they are beyond waking up. I call them the walking dead. Many people have watched my video, and they understand it. This is the people I am trying to reach, and that's certainly not everyone.

 

those are the same sorts that believe every word Michael Moore, Loose Change, or Zeitgeist has to say (though I love Zeitgeist just for it's style and effectiveness)