Explosions in London - Who stands to gain?

http://www.infowars.com/articles/world/uk_subway_bombing_who_gains.htm


Explosions In London
Who Stands To Gain? Israel Warned, Cover-up In Progress

Prisonplanet | July 07 2005

BREAKING: Scrambled cover-up to try and change prior knowledge story.

Original reports stated that Binyamin Netanyahu was warned BEFORE the first blast, now all the Associated Press reports are being changed to say he was warned AFTER the first blast, for example this article.

The article linked below that we saved in our own format (and the website that carried it has strangely since crashed) said that Netanyahu was warned before the first blast.

Israel are now denying they got a warning.

BREAKING: Scotland Yard says it got a warning before the attack and told Israel.

"The Israeli Embassy in London was notified in advance, resulting in Finance Minister Binyamin Netanyahu remaining in his hotel room rather than make his way to the hotel adjacent to the site of the first explosion, a Liverpool Street train station, where he was to address and economic summit."

Full article here.

The warning contradicts the fact that the original explanation of a power surge went out for an hour or more. They knew it was an attack but put out a false explanation. Plus why did Netanyahu get a warning and the victims didn't?

We have been told that the events unfolding today were "inevitable", London's transport network has been hit with multiple explosions. Both the Underground and Buses have been hit. Events are still unfolding.

We predicted this would happen over a year ago after analyzing the propaganda and fearmongering that was being ratcheted up to the extreme in London. Paul Joseph Watson has predicted these events as imminent several times on The Alex Jones Show in recent months.

Tony Blair is not in London but safely tucked up in Scotland with 7 other World Leaders including President Bush. The political eyes of the world are on Britain this week. The Mayor of London Ken Livingstone is in Singapore where the IOC has just awarded the Olympic Games to London, he is rushing back to the city.

Just like the events of 9/11, ask yourself, who stands to gain from this? Could this have been organized by any group other than one who has direct unlimited access to all areas of London's transport grid at all times?

This has MI5 written all over it. Just watch that national ID card legislation sail through. Only 15% of the country supported the government after the last election, this will ensure total fealty to a smarmy Blair and whatever he wants to do. Ken Livingstone and the opposition parties will now have no grounds to reject ID card legislation, especially with the Olympics coming to London in 2012.

The police state measures they'll get out of this will be overlaid onto all forms of transport. In fact, you won't be able to travel without the ID card. Although MI5 operations are normally more sophisticated than things like 9/11, in that the evidence linking it to the government is more carefully covered, just watch for the evidence of inside involvement to trickle out. MI5 have been caught involved in IRA bombings multiple times over.

More to come as events unfold

 

Just as I said in another post...

Blair was about to get flushed out of government, what a GREAT coincidence that all of a sudden a nice perfect attack comes to boost his approval rating! Israel got warnings of this attack and so did scotland yard, but now Israel is denying it, but this is clarly the case http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/...htm?POE=NEWISVA. Now...they are trying to deny they had any warning..http://breakingnews.iol.ie/news/sto...240&p=yzzyx68zx. Now a London branch of "Al Queda" has claimed responsibility http://www.rense.com/general66/alq.htm, But as we have seen before, Al Queda is nothing but a Mossad Front group http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/fakealqaeda.html, The Mossad has close ties to the MI5 and CIA, any questions?

Peace and Love,
Dan

 

But of course its Al Qaeda. How hard is it for any joe to pick up a phone and place an anonymous call to the police or better yet a mainstrem media outlet claiming to be speaking for Al qaeda and claiming responsibility.

The Paradigm through which every act in this ongoing charade was set with the never actually investigated 911 and continues to this day, be it Madrid, Ankara or London. Space out the attacks for moments when public opinion is waning or necessary measures for increased police state measures are due to be approved (aka ID Cards, Biometrics, comprehensive centralised databases, etc.) and the compliant non-investigatory mainstream media will take of sensationalising it through to the desired reactionist end.

Nevermind who all the strange unpronounceable arabic names due to be presented as the "culprits" happen to actually be (legitimate democratic opponents of our client state leaders, or worse, of Israeli barbarity toward Palestinians perhaps?). It will suffice for more than a sufficient majority of the sheeple that they were told by "official" proclamation that something has been done. Status quo perceptions saved yet again, no need to actively scrutinise what's really going on in the halls of power.

Another day in the empire.

 

Thanks for all your considerate words at this time....wankers.

 

As I just put in another post, Tony Blair has nothing to gain and quite a lot to loose form this. He got just over 40% of the popular vote and another thumping great majority in parliament. As for his ID card scheme its a little contraversial but it was just about kicking through. Not of course that he really needs to worry hes standing down some time in this parliament. By all means challenge conventional wisdom, infact do so. But think about it first and if it doesnt make sense dont say it, if there is a conspiracy theory once again it'll never be discovered because everyone is to busy laughing at stuff like this.

 

I am gonna apologise for the above, not that you will care. just a bit wound up by it all.

 

What precisely is more considerate matthew, having a weepy pity party of verbal bereavement for people none of us are likely to know or pointing out the context in which this act, like its predecessors in Madrid and Ankara, points to very likely attempts to retraumatise the masses into continued compliance with new more invasive measures waiting to be forced through?

While you may be saitisfied when they present the expected roster of unpronounceable names as those "identified" to be the culprits, perhaps youll give some thought to the much greater likelihood that what you are witnessing is only the creation of additional innocent victims to mask those truly responsible; culprits who have much more to gain in material and political terms than a few weeks of notoriety on the front pages of the dailys.

Of course, looking at the larger picture at work is much more disturbing than staying safely perched on the bandwagon of popular explanations. The latter certainly demands far less active civic duty.

 

but thinking still sounds too much like hard work?

 

It's understandable that people don't want to believe that their government is complicit in such a horrific attack on its own citizens. For years, I refused to accept that the government was behind 9/11. The more I read, the angrier I got, and the more I wanted the truth to be known.

The fact is, for the most part, the people in the British government -- like the US government -- are good people, who are just doing their job. It's the select few at the top, that have their own agenda, coupled with a total disregard for humanity, who will do whatever it takes to see that their ends are met. Since many of these forces operate ABOVE the government, they're immune to any exposure or punishment for their horrendous actions.

Of course Tony Blair has blood on his hands. Do I think he orchestrated the attacks himself? No. But he certainly has a lot to gain from the attacks. I don't see how you can say that he wouldn't, when it has proven time and time again that terrorism helps to bind a country together and rally around its "leader". Just look at Bush's approval ratings before and after September 11th.

For the most part, people in England cannot stand BLIAR, and understandably so. The only reason Blair won the last election was because the election was set up -- deliberately -- in a way that the "opposition" was even worse than Blair. Right now, Blair's approval rating is at an all-time low, thanks in-part to the National ID fiasco. But now, because of today's attacks, you can guarantee his approval rating will soar. (As will Bush's.)

People need to wake up and ask themselves who really stands to gain. Right now, the support for the Iraq war is the lowest it has ever been. This attack works perfectly to increase international support for this bogus "War on Terror", while more and more people give up their rights and liberties to the police state which is being set up. How do the Arabs benefit from terrorist events, when it only brings more tyranny to their holy lands?

Of course I cannot say with absolute certainty that these attacks were an inside job. But I would say that there is a 95% chance that they were, especially when you look at the motive. It's also a fact that British intelligence -- like the other intelligence agencies, both in England and elsewhere -- have helped to train and fund al-Queda (which is really nothing more than a CIA/MI6/Mossad front, IMO).

 

So you believe the opposition are working with the labour goverment to keep the labour goverment in power... they purposely are crap to keep the labour goverment in power. ''ID fiasco'' what are you talking about . Please stop putting all your conspiracys in one basket .. you are making me wet my pants with laughter.

 

Many people are already against Blair because of the illegal Iraqi war. Now he wants to push an ID card on the people (if you followed the news, you would know about it). Of course this is very unpopular amongst the people of England. But, under such circumstances (ie: today's "terrorist" attacks), more of the public will now likely support and accept it, thinking it will provide them with "security" and "protection" from the "evil doers" in al-Qaeda.

It's called problem-reaction-solution. Read about it.

And yes, I believe England's election was deliberately set-up in a way designed to keep Blair in power. This might not have been known to the bulk of the opposition party, but those orchestrating things from the top, who have their own agenda.

 

I have/do follow the news... trotting out 'fiasco' tells me nothing, explain why you think it is so. Have you not kept up with the news http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4632835.stm it is a reality and the vast majority of people only have a problem with the cost, a minority hold the kind of view you do. I will be told that this is because they are 'sheeple' and follow the tabloids mainstream agenda (i am sure) please this is a tired old load of idiocy. people don't log onto wild conspiritorial websites morning noon and night, or buy into the PNAC one world goverment idea.. this is because it is vastly overstated.

 

Im not a huge Blair fan, i wasnt for the war on Iraq and im definately against the ID card scheme in the UK. But I still see no reason to blame him for whats happened today. I live near London and I would like nothing more than to see the right person get caught for it, whoever that maybe. Though I see no reason to suspect Blair. Whatever you may think of Blair his legacy is very important to him, that has been made clear throughout his time as PM. This week was his big chance to make a real difference at the G8, I think we can all agree that nothing is going to come out of that now, everyone can safely do nothing and have a good excuse.

I dont know where all this stuff about Blairs ratings is coming from. It is true that Blairs rating have slipped but its not like they are in free fall. I dont think any leader has ever enjoyed total support but Blair is doing pretty well, to be into a third term and still be in the lead by some distance is quite an achievement. Compared to the gains he could have had by making a success of the G8 summit any gain from this will be slight, especially when considered that the patriotism card dosent play as well in Europe as it does in the US.

I imagine if they so choose this could be used to increase the amount of 'security' legislation being passed. However if the government had anything to do with it this would be about the least likely day to do it, during the G8, the day after getting the olymipcs?

No, I dont know who did it. Its clear from your post you dont either but bashing our leaders wont help. They may not be particularly good leaders but that doesnt make them the root of all evil in this world. Lets look at this objetively so that we might at least give ourselves a chance of catching whoever is responsible.

 

Seems you conflate issues yourself matt. The PNAC is no conspiracy nor a recipe for "one world government", but a very real and very involved Washington Think Tank comprising most of the key members of the current administration. That they are also demonstrably the architects of the ongoing US agenda of war for resource control (in keeping with both their verifiable proscription for US global dominance "Rebuilding America's Defences" and with the more virulent apologetic for the same by Brzezinski (The Grand Chessboard) only makes your evasion of reality more pathetic.

 

I have read the PNAC agenda first hand second hand and third hand many many times. I am sure i am missing something that has been written in a few peoples books. It has how many 'key members Lick could you please name these people ? 'Not being greatly versed in all of the 'Bush administration' i would appreciate some help. I would hate to log onto there website, clearly it is only going to give me what they want me to know (nothing more).

 

Youll find a list of key Bush admin/PNAC members here...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century

Along with a considerable body of further links should you be bothered to do any real research.

Enjoy.

 

Geez, what a hypocrite. I don't know who was responsible for today's attacks, and I'm not about to point fingers at anyone until an actual investigation has been carried out. That's why I don't understand Jones; the fact that a culprit was named in the 9/11 attacks before an investigation was carried out has, as far as I know, been one of Jones' long-time talking points for proving his case against the U.S. government. A bit hypocritical that he would now do what, according to him, the evil elite has done...

 

Yeah I love jones as a reporter, journalist, and radio talk show host, but he does have a bad habit of A. Jumping to conclusions B. Taking Some People's words out of context, but he doesn't do this to an excessive amount, so i enjoy him very much and think he has more to offer than most other political investigators I know...

Peace and Love,
Dan