i don't know if anyone else has ever noticed this, but it seems to me that a lot of times on a woman's body she'll either have a good set of tits and ass or good legs and stomach, but very rarely will she have all 4. i mean, it seems like a lot of men (and some women, such as myself) prefer larger breasts and ass, but if a woman has these her legs and stomach will often be less lean than on a woman with a flat stomach and thinner legs, but with smaller boobs and butt. for example, right now, i have larger breasts and ass, which draw their fair share of attention, but i'm unhappy with my legs and stomach, and i know that if i were to lose weight it would more than likely be at the sacrifice of the size of my breasts and butt, but of course my stomach would be flatter and my legs less bulky, so i'm a kinda conflicted as to what to do. which do you prefer- a woman who has leaner legs and a flatter stomach but smaller breasts and a flatter ass or a slightly heavier woman with larger, more gropeable boobs and a spankable ass?
yeah i kinda agree, if someones got a toned tummy and legs, their normally skinny and fit which means their tits are smaller and the ass is more toned, im glad i have tits and arse though, i am a woman afterall
Well I had bigger boobs before breastfeeding! And good legs and butt but my tummy needs toning. So where does that put me?
Yes I agree. Much sexier on a woman. Leave it to a man to have a fit stomach and legs. For women, bring on the curves.
If they don't have all four, I'd probably go with the woman with the better legs and stomach. Even though I like big boobs, if the stomach is all wrong, it doesn't matter.
I couldn't disagree more with this thread. Big =/= good (when it comes to breasts and butts) Small =/= good (when it comes to tummies and legs)
i dont really thing huge breasts and a big stomach are that attractive....when I hear curves I think a nice hour glass shape, not fat everywhere.... but a lack of ass isnt the greatest thing either...and I think if you're active without being fanatical about it, its possible to keep the booty while toning up the stomach and legs...breast size is more or less left up to God
Well, here's the way I look at it. I love a full figured woman with a nice ass & huge boobs (not ridiculously huge or anything like that) & I love it even more when it's all natural. The thing is, anyone can work out & take away stomach fat, so I'd have to go with option A because you can work on things like a flabby stomach but there's practically nothing a girl can do to increase boobs & ass. Just my own $0.02 on the topic.
Coming from a chick... as long as a woman isn't monstrously out of proportion and riddled with rolls and cellulite, I would go for the boob/butt combo. Like someone else said, leave the legs and abs to the guys. I don't really dig the six pack washboard stomach on chicks, but let's not be sloppy either. Ideal girly tummies should be creamy and soft, without jiggling when you brush your teeth.
the booty is the most important part the boobs and legs dont matter some extra baggage is sexy at least to me
Why do you think the booty is the most important part? At the end of the day I think the face is the most important. I don't care how good a girl's figure is, if her face looks like it's been hammered with a railroad spike, then it's all bad.
The last of the famous romantics, I see.. The world takes all sorts. Girls of every shape, look and size can be attractive. Whoever thinks any different, throw away your rule book, that's ugly.