the other day i was watching some show on HBO about this dad who rolls with his 18 year old son. then they were rolling and he let his 13 yr old son and 15 yr old daughter roll and he paid for them. does anyone see anything wrong with this?
you know, kids are going to do drugs whether you think or kid is an angel, or not. so isnt better that the kids are doing rolls with the father in a safe environment, in case something goes wrong? i dont agree with giving kids that young phycadelic drugs, but if they are going to do it, i think that they are doing it in the best environment.
i can see where peacelovebarefeet is coming from, when it comes to the young teens doing it with their father, because it is probably safer than somewhere else and they will try it anyways. But i disagree with the situation from the beginnging. I do not think that the father is setting a very good example for his children, expecially by letting them participate in the usage of dangerous drugs at such a young age. Because lets not forget the damages that X can do to the brain. Its no marijuana, it actually can be dangerous if one isnt careful. I believe it could be acceptable for the father to do it with the 18 year old because he is most likely able to make up his own mind about things and be responsible for his actions, but the others are just kids and have too much ahead of them for their father to hand them a dangerous drug. I think it is irresponsible on his behalf.
x only has a long term affect, meaning if you take rolls constantly over a decent time span its gonna have an effect on ya
The name of the special was "Small Town Ecstasy." His kids were already on rolls, but after he figured out what they were doing he got hooked as well. It was an alright show up until the point where they pulled that MRI/holes in brain bullshit...
