How do you guys feel about Wikipedia?

Discussion in 'Random Thoughts' started by Gravity, Feb 7, 2008.

  1. Gravity

    Gravity #winning

    Messages:
    2,677
    Likes Received:
    5
    I think it's a good thing if used in the right context. It's good as a port of call when you need to know something, but not so good when people try and right essays based purely on what they've seen on wikipedia.

    I think most of the information is accurate, but the anti-wikipedia technophobes will advocate the informational innacuracies. All in all I think the good outways the bad.
     
  2. Cate8

    Cate8 Senior Member

    Messages:
    22,413
    Likes Received:
    12
    I feel angry about Wikipedia. I created my own personal page and they didnt feel I needed one. grr.
     
  3. bandbeyondescription

    bandbeyondescription Nothertimesforgottenspace

    Messages:
    1,376
    Likes Received:
    2
    dictionary is way better and accurate
     
  4. Shane99X

    Shane99X Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,127
    Likes Received:
    14
    wikipedia is the face of the future.
     
  5. DroopySnoopy

    DroopySnoopy The ORIGINAL Dr. Droop

    Messages:
    13,089
    Likes Received:
    4
    I use it daily, but not for professional use.
     
  6. SlydeHippie

    SlydeHippie Banned

    Messages:
    453
    Likes Received:
    0
    Reliable to an extent.

    I do quick Wiki-searches here and there, but when I need to do some heavy research, I look elsewhere.
     
  7. BraveSirRubin

    BraveSirRubin Members

    Messages:
    34,144
    Likes Received:
    24
    I love it.

    Plus you can easily use it professionally. Most articles link their points to very credible sources. You just go to the source website and derive your information from them.
     
  8. seamonster66

    seamonster66 discount dracula

    Messages:
    22,557
    Likes Received:
    15
    I like it too, and it amazes me how about anything I would look up is included
     
  9. Elijah

    Elijah Member

    Messages:
    1,626
    Likes Received:
    2
  10. BraveSirRubin

    BraveSirRubin Members

    Messages:
    34,144
    Likes Received:
    24
    That website is a load of crap.

    Sure, Wiki isn't going to give you a complete scientific breakdown of a shark's penis, but it will tell you that I shark has a penis and how it uses it to reproduce.

    Just like any encyclopedia would.

    There is no spam in Wiki, and they correct their articles fairly fast. Those people are paranoid.
     
  11. veroness

    veroness There's only one :)

    Messages:
    3,401
    Likes Received:
    2
    its good. i like it because it gives you some where to start out if your doing a research paper. im choosing to make my research paper two pages instead of the 8... or not doing it. its too time comsuming :)
     
  12. Elijah

    Elijah Member

    Messages:
    1,626
    Likes Received:
    2
    the only crap i smell is what's coming out of your mouth right this second. an encylopeia that anybody can edit LOL. you'd be better off sticking to Britanica. Wikipedia is often times a portal to various porn websites. how is that educational anyways?


     
  13. Beckner420

    Beckner420 troll

    Messages:
    3,092
    Likes Received:
    2
    Wiki is probably the most useful tool on the internet right now. Everyday i use wiki at least twice.

    ^man the only topics dumbasses edit are the dumbass topics to begin with.
     
  14. BraveSirRubin

    BraveSirRubin Members

    Messages:
    34,144
    Likes Received:
    24
    Yes, the fact that anyone can edit it is the beauty.

    ...and it somehow always manages to remain accurate after they correct the edits... and believe me, they do it fast.

    Other than that... double check with the original source when you're using Wiki... it's that simple. You have to be an idiot to quote wrong information from Wiki.

    I'm sure that Wiki will give you links to porn websites if you're reading an entry about scrotum domination... but wouldn't you expect some links after reading about something so fascinating? :)

    Anyhow... Wiki is awesome. You stick to your Britanica. Do much independent academic research?
     
  15. Elijah

    Elijah Member

    Messages:
    1,626
    Likes Received:
    2
    wikipedia has it's moments of merit. but i think there's more to meets the eye to them.
     
  16. Beckner420

    Beckner420 troll

    Messages:
    3,092
    Likes Received:
    2
    I think the makers of wiki should have been nominated for some nobel prize.
     
  17. Elijah

    Elijah Member

    Messages:
    1,626
    Likes Received:
    2
    something tells me all you did was click the link and look at the front page without actually reading the articles. Britanica is and always has been way more reputable than shittypedia could ever be.


     
  18. BraveSirRubin

    BraveSirRubin Members

    Messages:
    34,144
    Likes Received:
    24
    Nah, I read one of them before deciding that it was all pretty damn idiotic.

    I've always liked Britanica.

    Yet, Wiki is the future, it's more convenient, and it sure does have a whooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooole lot more info than Britanica.
     
  19. KJohns24029

    KJohns24029 Member

    Messages:
    266
    Likes Received:
    1
    I like wikipedia. It helped me when I was in school.
     
  20. Elijah

    Elijah Member

    Messages:
    1,626
    Likes Received:
    2
    it also has a whole lot more nonsense than britanica.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice