If you were accused of not being a Christian, could you prove them wrong?

If your genocidal Jewish G-d ever fronted a human court his trial, if he wasn't justifiably lynched first, wouldn't last five minutes. The trouble is even the Nazis had no jurisprudence that would permit the convicting court to treat him as he treats his victims, by torturing the murdering old turd for all eternity.


Clearly your arch criminal, mad-dog of a G-d is the Siamese twin of Satan – a condemnable and deliberate sower of discord, division, and death. As someone so attracted to the criminal antics of this gory Jewish ogre that you unreservedly love him, you are, according to common sense, either as intrinsically evil as your bilious love, or you are grovellingly lying like a 2 dollar toupee to conform to social norms and to save your disgracefully craven arse in some hearsay afterlife.

 

It wouldnt bother me since I dont call myself a christian due to all the hypocrites that have tarnished that title.
And a REAL Christian wouldnt be going around pointing the finger at others because that would be Judging.

 

Plus , it doesnt matter what folks think , I dont HAVE to prove what I am to anyone....God Knows , and thats all that matters.

 

This sure sounds like judging to me. But that's okay, Big Jewly said even a cafeteria Christian is qualified to judge unbelieving Untermenschen -

http://userwww.service.emory.edu/~cmadd01/shouldju.html

 

I wernt Judging , I was explaining WHY I have a problem with that title.
PLUS....Im not a Christian.....If I were , I would be a lot better person than I am....Doesnt the Word Christian mean Christlike ?

 

S-u-r-e!

 

Speaking of bilious.

 

I don't think anyone should have to prove their religion. Religion is a personal thing.

Its been my experience with Christianity that a lot of so-called Christians don't have a clue what it means to truly be a Christian. A Christian, in my opinion, acts in concordance with the teachings of Jesus Christ. In that case, one should be able to prove themselves by their actions and not words.

 

It's a personal relationship so it can't be proved. If you claim that you can prove it it will only lead to a bunch of circle debate and fighting that's not at all productive.

Maybe it could be proved to the person by actions over time, but that doesn't really mean anything either, because it will only be their opinion.

 

Are you disputing or defending the undeniably nauseous nature of the most evil entity ever to have lived, i.e., the patently criminal JUDEO - christian God? Who once wiped out an entire planet full of his kids because he was disappointed in the way they turned out? Or are you just defending his clearly equally as evil followers for the Brownie points you fancy your feigned offended decency will earn you?

 

his followers are equally evil for a reason....man created god in his image, not the other way around.

 

Sorry Melial. But it is as plain as the nose on His face that Jesus wouldn't even piss up a gentile's arse if his guts were on fire.

http://www.biblicalheritage.org/Jesus/would.htm

 

eh...

I'm not really a Christian, but I do think ol' Jesus had some good things to say, jewish or not.

 

It may come as a surprise but so do I!

 

That's precisely what I'm saying.....

 

then we're in agreement

 

Yep. Although I doubt you want to treat them the same way we treat(ed) Communists, Muslims, Nazis, and any other philosophical/religious/or political bent that ever offended or offends our tender sensibilities, like I do.

 

i certainly don't. I don't want to treat communists or muslims that way either. People are people. I tend to agree with anne frank on this one, I think people are mostly good at heart. The people at the top of the totem pole in christianity, islam, communism, etc etc (i'm gonna stay away from the subject of nazis on this one lol) pervert these things for their own purposes but I dont think that makes everyone belonging to those groups bad people.

 

No and no.

Just curious if the word was a mistake. 'Bilious' love? Oxymoron. And, more true of your comments than of love.

Why do you fear to spell God? Is there a reason you can't bring yourself to put the o in the word?

 

I meant a bilious, or nauseous, or sickening (as observed by non-infected onlookers) kind of love. Anyhow, you do yourself a disservice in the eyes of the educated here by mocking a 7th grader's grammar. Not to mention my medically diagnosed alcoholic brain damage. :drool5:

And speaking of bilious, why would I wanna love a bilious bunch of cunts, who think a supernatural and criminally insane sadist, who gets a boner thinking about burning untold billions of his kids forever, is the most lovable, the most endearing entity ever?? In case you hadn't noticed, these fucking Froot Loops sing batshit insane genocidal psalms about bathing in the blood of their hallucinated "enemies," (sane folk) and worse, yet so-called "decent" society abjectly brays "Such nice people, these Christians. Gee, I hope my kids turn out like them!"

If you can't see there is something drastically wrong with people who are attracted to such a vile, vicious beast as this, then obviously you are no better than them.

I'm only showing my deference for the inventors of the Christian religion, the Jews. G-d said they aren't allowed to say his name, so the crafty Kikes (PBUT!!) leave out a letter so he won't know they are referring to him. Apparently the dopey old prick has been trying different combinations of English vowels for thousands of years trying to work what "G-d" means. :smilielol5:Ya gotta hand it to the Jews. They have had that oafish old fool, and the Froot Loop Christians, dancing to their tune since they were only a gleam in Abraham's eyes!