Kerry Threw the Election

http://www.benfrank.net/nuke/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=272

Kerry Threw the Election
by BENFRANK.NET



(Editor's Note: Kerry coulda been a contender, but his Skull and Bones brothers told him to throw the election. And so Ben Frank learns how the world works...)

Kerry's silence indicates complicity with vote fraud.

Go to JohnKerry.com and you will find absolutely nothing about the mounting evidence of vote fraud.

Why? There is no mention of the official voting receipts found in the garbage, or about the vote suppression in Ohio, or about the GAO starting an investigation into the 57,000 reported cased of voting ’irregularities’ nationwide. 13 Members of Congress have asked for an investigation into the voting problems, heaven forbid JohnKerry.com mention that.

Why is it that VoteNader.com and VoteCobb.org both address the voting problems right on the front page, but the Democratic ticket of Kerry and Edwards won’t address the issue at all?

It seems like Kerry and Edwards didn’t really want to win, almost like they’re ready for a vacation. They’re telling us, get over it, we lost, it’s time to move on and unite behind our leader? What the bleep is that all about? I thought Kerry was our candidate because Bush was so bad we had to get rid of shrubbie.

Then after this election where all of the computer ’glitches’ favored Bush, Kerry just tucks tail and hides? Thousands of Americans were turned away from the polls thanks to Republican dirty tricks, so Kerry gives up and tells us to get behind Bush? seettuuuup.

We’ve wasted billions of dollars and destroyed hundreds of thousands of lives- now we’re stuck in a war without end and the hatred of America at an all time high... and our guy, Mr. Anybody But Bush, is silent about vote fraud and suppression that clearly cost him the election. Doesn’t that seem a little bit fishy?

Kerry is joined in silence by Edwards, Dean, Clinton, Gore and the official Democratic Party. They all remain silent in the face of undeniable evidence of vote fraud. And it’s not just the voting machines without a paper trail, there are hundreds of sworn statements delivered by Ohio residents detailing various Republican tricks to prevent democrats from voting.

Why are Nader and Cobb raising money for recounts while Kerry refuses to pay for any of them? Is Kerry really fighting for the people? If he is, why does he have $51 million left over from his campaign? How can anyone think that not spending $50 million was part of a successful plan to win? Why did Kerry do that?

If you’d been reading news on the net before the election, you’d have known that some people were claiming Kerry was throwing the election all the way.

Bush and Kerry are distant cousins, and both members of the ’frat’ Skull and Bones at Yale. (1) Think, is it just an amazing coincidence that the two main candidates were related, multi-millionaire boners? Is it possible for you to consider that, perhaps there really is an elite group of families running the country? Some call it the New World Order, it’s like the Mafia x 1000, without the accents.

Understandably most Americans are reluctant to think that organized crime has taken over our government, that both candidates were puppets for evil behind the scenes masters. But folks, what if its true? Isn’t it worth looking at? It’s easier for people to tell themselves that Bush really won, stupid people voted for him and now we’re stuck with four more years of war.

his is easier because they can continue about their life as usual- recognizing that our gov’t is corrupt might require them to change their daily lives. It’s so much easier to say, "Oh well, too bad for those Iraqis and Iranians that will die, at least I still have my life as usual." Apathy- that’s what is killing our country.

To acknowledge that the mafia has taken over is a scary concept, nonetheless, I ask you to see if the hat fits. In my opinion, this was a staged election all the way, with the express purpose of re-installing Bush to create the illusion of warmongering America, justifying more wars, more terror threats and more spying on Americans- Big Brother has arrived. Am I a ’conspiracy nut’? Think for yourself, which doesn’t mean believe everything I say, but it means do not discredit it just because the mainstream media does. Are these thoughts really outlandish conspiracy, or just basic logic?

Why did the Democrats choose a pro-war candidate. If we really had to beat Bush, wouldn’t an anti-war candidate been the clear difference that Kerry couldn’t create.

By election day, people were saying, "well their policies are about the same, and I like Bush better, he’s funny to listen to." Why weren’t we allowed a choice between pro-war and anti-war? Was Kerry really the choice of the people, or was he a puppet installed against our will- by the corporate media.

Kerry’s campaign sucked. Bush lied, flat out lied, and we have it on tape! All Kerry needed to do was present these lies to the public and the idiot would be exposed, but Kerry didn’t. He "never used the harshest word" to describe Bush’s lies. Why?

I’m sorry but I just can’t get over this- Kerry finished this election campaign with $50 million in the bank. Why? He didn’t want to win is the only logical explanation. Several days after the story broke, they came out with damage control- Kerry has only $15 million left, he gave the rest to the DNC. Think the numbers transposed is mere coincidence, or intentional misinformation?

Even with the $15 million, Kerry hasn’t offered to help pay for any of the recounts, BBVs Florida investigation or even the Volusia County Lawsuit. (2)

Exit Polls are the canary in the mine shaft, they’ve exposed vote fraud in two other nations this year, but in America the media and Kerry/Edwards say the exit polls were wrong- move on, get over it.

From Exit Polls to Protect the Vote
- after the exit polls and results didn’t match in Georgia (Russia), opposition supporters stormed the parliament and the president was forced to resign.

After Exit Polls clashed with final results in the Ukraine Yushchenko stood up and demanded a fair vote. Why didn’t Kerry? This led to hundreds of thousands braving sub-zero temperatures to protest the unelected government.

The Exit Polls were off here, only in the Key swing states, and always in favor of Bush, what an amazing coincidence... 250 million to 1 odds according to Steven Freeman, PhD. Why hasn’t Kerry mentioned this, or at least posted a link on his website.... because he doesn’t want to look bad? I’d say he looks pretty f***in bad right now.

If Kerry had stood up and addressed these vote fraud issues, the media would not have been able to completely blackout the story as they have. Only Keith Olbermann has mentioned it on MSNBC, so perhaps a few million Americans have seen it on tv, and a few million more on the internet.... but the vast majority continues to live in the ’Bush won’ reality. Kerry’s silence is enabling this media blackout.

Are these the actions of a real candidate that really wanted to save America from the warmongers?

"But to find a resolution of the conflict does not mean accepting falsified elections. We will never agree to that." Nice eh, too bad that came from Ukranian Presidential Challenger Viktor

Yushchenko. Why didn’t our candidate say that?

And perhaps more importantly, does Bush agree with these words from the Ukranian incumbent, "I need no fictitious victory, a result which could lead to violence and victims. No position of authority, no matter how important, is worth a single human life."

What can you do about it? Boycott entertainment- turn off the tv and NPR. Listen to inspiring music and get fired up. Listen to that MLK speech everyday and feel his passion.

Then, be your own media- make phone calls, write emails, print flyers or even FreewayBlog. Do something, anything to pass this information on, the election was stolen, and Kerry is complicit. Trust me, most people are excited to hear that there is hope to overthrow the shrubbie- get out there and give people hope!

Or is it easier to just forget all this and turn the tv back on, I’m sure some great sitcoms or reality shows are on to distract you, to keep you silent, stuck inside your own home.

"There comes a time when silence is betrayal" - Martin Luther King Jr.

1. How weird is Skull and Bones? When they tried to admit women in the 90’s, a group of bonesman including William F. Buckley sued to keep the women out, claiming it would lead to date rape.

2. BlackBoxVoting’s Bev Harris found the smoking gun, proof of fraud and the Kerry camp does not care. According to a statement by the Supervisor of Elections on November 17, 2004, the GEMS computer is not networked, and is "stand alone." The furnished computer logs show evidence of at least two attempts to remotely access the GEMS central tabulator, which is claimed to be secure. A computer screen shot printout on November 17, 2004 (found in the trash) shows that the GEMS computer at that time had two networked hard drives.

I showed the logs to CNN cameramen yesterday, along with 59 orange-tagged poll tapes that were missing signatures, zero tapes, sometimes missing results altogether! No interest in getting a shot of that smoking gun at all.



We intereviewed poll workers. On camera. Showed them the poll tapes we were given by Volusia County. To a person, they said, with great concern, "That is NOT what we submitted to the county."
One remembered the results on his poll tape. What he remembered, before ever seeing the results tape or hearing what was on our copy, was not the same. His memory for a precinct with a tad over 400 voters had 60 more votes for Kerry. Of course, that’s not legally binding, since he hadn’t written it down.

And don’t forget that in Volusia, poll workers were told to bring their memory cards and poll tapes off to ’drop offs’ or ’depots’, and it was there that the modem-ing occurred. We have no information whatsoever on who was in those depots, or what they were doing, or what equipment was there.

Meanwhile a completely irresponsible Kerry Campaign holds on to a $52 million litigation war chest accumulated from citizen donations for that purpose.

If they were the slightest bit interested in either voting system integrity or actually winning, they would have litigated the Black Box Voting records requests to apply some real muscle into prompt disclosure of audit materials, at least in Ohio and Florida. Failure to comply with Sunshine Laws is against the law, yet a citizens group like Black Box Voting cannot claim legal urgency, forcing immediate compliance, in the same way that a campaign can. There is no question that if the campaign had enforced the Sunshine Laws, analyzing the audit data, two things would have happened:

1) Records would have been produced

2) Auditing would have been enabled, and we all know that would have produced hard evidence of irregularities....

The Kerry attorney in Volusia, by the way, came by but asked not a single question, never asked to look at any evidence, and told one of the producers of Votergate that he thought Black Box Voting was just here to "stir up trouble."

3. How do they corrupt our politicians? In Confessions of an Economic Hit Man, John Perkins writes about "when the National Security Agency recruited me, they put me through a day of lie detector tests. They found out all my weaknesses and immediately seduced me. They used the strongest drugs in our culture, sex, power and money, to win me over.... I felt guilty throughout the whole time, but I was seduced. The power of these drugs, sex, power, and money, was extremely strong for me."

That photo of Kerry and Theresa was taken shortly after the election loss. Do they look sad?

 

without speculating upon the inside hows and whyfors, but simply having observed what most of us were able to as it unfolded, my distinct impression was also indeed that in lagre part kerry had been somehow bought off to take a fall. that may not be the whole story but certainly a major part of it. another major part might have been selective coverage by a corporate and vested controlled media. at any rate what coverage i did see of kerry's campaigning, a good deal of the time he did seem to be promoting the very same policies of the unfortunately existing administration. why oh why i kept asking myself does he keep doing that. if he didn't want to come out and stand up for a recognition of the fundimental corruption and all but universaly harmful bias of those policies, why oh why couldn't or wouldn't he, have made more of his real potential streingths, and rather then merely attempting to avoid offending a diversity of sectors, actualy appeal to them as he was nominated on the strength of the ability he was known to have had to be able to do so?

that is a question that will haunt many of us for a very long time. but even more; could we have instead nominated someone, or some several someones, from each of the other parties, that could have appealed to a broad enough spectrum of intrests, who could or would NOT have been bought off?

i hope and believe the answer to that is yes. and that we will find some way of doing so. REAL SOON.

sharpton would have been as wierd as bush but possibly a hell of a lot more interesting. kussenich would, did and does, appearently for the most part, want to do the best possible things, though with one notable exception and i'm affratid congress would have stampeeded right of the top of him and trampled him into the ground.

there were other possibilities of course as well. but what is past is past and what we are faced with now is what it is.

for my own part i would like to see green and libertarian candidates be legitimately major contenders, even THE major contenders, and a system which enabled them to be.

the old mule may not be dead, but dam it sure needs somehow to wake up. somehow to become once again effective without selling its soul to do so which in my oppinion would completely defeat the whole point of its doing so.

of course the real conservatives appearantly have sold their souls which is how we have these neo/psuedo-'conservatives' in power.

not all of them of course, even some of the crustiest of old time hard liners started whining before the election they weren't getting their piece of it.

which was one of the reasons that had given me some hope things would have and could have come out better then they did.

but blame, no mater who we lay it on, and there is surely more then enough to go arround, isn't going to solve what we're facing now.

so i'm not saying that to criticize what may be a fair evaluation, only to remind ourselves that there is an alternative to sinking into fatal dispair and that is to gird up our loins and keep on keeping on.

they come and they go.
where are alexander's bones or ceaser's?
gone to the worms and back to the earth, just like anyone else's.

and we can always point ourselves in their direction when we take a piss out in the woods.
------
(this is where i came back from reading the rest of it):

please don't mystake me for saying we need to just accept corruption. what i mean is we need to not be detered by the existence of it from somehow doing what needs to be done. dam i wish we could somehow barrow some of them russian BALLS that were spoken of.

i've always been fearful that if i stand up i might get killed or imprissoned. but now i'm begining to wonder that if i don't that might not just happen anyway.

i'm glad that wasn't just about laying blame, but about what can and does need to be done about it now.

NOW is the time to pull out all the stops and start pressing for empeachment proceedings and other avenues of redress that had been held off prior to and for the sake of the election.

storming congress might be like storming the beach at normandy. it was known that the effort would be for many virualy suicidal. yet it DID succeed.

those success stories from the ukraine have got me to thinking now maybe it IS possible. SOMEthing HAS to be possible and SOMEthing HAS to be done.

=^^=
.../\...

 

It's becoming easier to believe this every day. It makes me ill.

 

im grossed out..


on a side note are they really related tell me that isnt so... fuck i voted for the other devil!

 

Yes, Bush and Kerry are DISTANT cousins. Yet they are distant cousins which share the same blue-bloodlines dating back to Charlemagne, to whom they're BOTH related. Both are also related to Queen Elizabeth.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.freepressinternational.com/bloodline.html

Free Press International
10.23.2004


President George W. Bush and Sen. John Kerry are ninth cousins, twice removed and both are related to Queen Elizabeth.

Bush and Kerry are also related to Hugh Hefner(ninth cousins), Marilyn Monroe, Gen. Douglas MacArthur, Benedict Arnold, Franklin D. Roosevelt, attempted presidential assassin John Hinckley Jr., Princess Diana, George Washington, Charlemagne and Walt Disney.

John Kerry can be traced back to King James I and to the bloodlines of the Windsor and Hanover families.

President Bush is of direct descent to Henry III, Henry VIII's sister Mary Tudor, Louis XI of France and Charles II of England.

Why has mainstream television chosen not to tell the world John Kerry and President Bush are distant cousins and much more?

As a side note, Presidents George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Theodore Roosevelt, Franklin Roosevelt and Ronald Reagan all had strong blueblood links.

See also:

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/03/04/politics/main604163.shtml

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4286105/

 

I agree that Kerry has lots of explaining to do regarding the money he ended his campaign with. But are you people seriously arguing that Kerry was so loyal to his family that he threw the presidency out of love for his ninth cousin? Please.

Kerry made lots of mistakes on the campaign trail, but throwing the election was not one of them.

 

No, more like for the love of their shared hidden agenda.

 

Hell, Kerry probably had a hand in supressing the car engine which runs on pure water. Or he's hiding Aliens in a bunker in New Mexico. Or perhaps he's the one monitoring the still alive JFK on his breathing machine......Jeez.

SO WHAT about the "cousins" thing? If you go back far enough, you could find some unseemly people in YOUR past as well. I am actually related to King Henry the 8th. Really (I am not being sarcastic here.) But, I don't have any royal privleges, nor did anyone even know about it until someone did a silly ancestor search. One does not have control over who they are related to.

This is just so silly, this conspiracy shit.

 

thats pretty wild, all of the people that they are related too...most people have maybe 1 or 2 well known people remotely related to them....mine being rod serling.

I have no trouble at all believing that there is much controlling politics that I don´t know about. It certainly isn´t exactly what it seems on the surface.

After taking a colege level political sceince course and learning about all the shadowy events during presidential campaigns and terms in the past, its not at all hard to believe that worse is likely going on now.

 

Strange thing is, I too am related to King Henry VIII... we're relatives! Not only that, I'm also related to the former dictator/president of Indonesia... Suharto.

 

this whole country is just messed up...

 

Hey, Orsino and I are cousins! Don't tell anyone about the, you know, family conspiracy, OK? Y'know that secret plan to rule the world, (or at least the Hip Forum boards.)

Cool, George!

Hugs,
Maggie

 

No two people running for office have been as closely related as Bush and Kerry. Hell, it's incredibly rare that two people picked from random are as closely related as Bush and Kerry are, let alone with blue blood. It's not uncommon for people of European ancestory to have maybe one royal descendent going way back, but not the number Bush and Kerry have and are much closer related to. Bush and Kerry have an unusually large number of royal and noble descendents. Then again, so did most of the presidents -- 34 of 43 who are descendents of Charlemagne.

Don't you find it odd that in a country that is as ethnically diverse as the US, all of the US presidents have direct linkage to royal bloodlines that trace back to the no more than 13 elite, ruling illuminary families? The presidents of the United States are as much of a royal dynasty as anything in Europe, from whence their bloodlines came.

Until you understand the ruling class and their bloodlines, you will never understand how politics (or what we call "politics") truly work, so just go back to the Al Franken and Michael Moore literature that is more at your level of reality.

Also, Maggie, you failed to touch on anything else mentioned in that article, other than about Bush and Kerry being cousins, which is only a small portion of the mystery.

Sounds like somebody is in denial

 

quote:34 of 43 who are decendents of Charlamagne.

That is absolutely stunning to me.

 

It's America's version of a royal family ruling us. American politics will never change as long as you have to be a millionaire to have a chance.

 

Is this really that surprising? I've (and others on this forum) said many times long before 2004 that the outcome of this election had already been determined. The proclivity of the US Government's direction has been permenantly altered by the inception of the PNAC referendum and its underlying intentions of the New World Order contrivance and its vested corporate interests. Bush AND Kerry are just pawns of the corporate elite; puppets who are deeply woven into the pockets of their common corporate contributors, acting out the assigned roles of their respective parties. I'm sure Kerry got a fat paycheck from the higher-ups for successfully convincing many of you that he is a liberal who actually cares about the lower classes.

 

he's got that 50 mil that he's not using towards recounts or investigations into voter fraud.

Broaden your scope of reality here people. Pressed_Rat speaks the truth. I mean, come on, its not a conspiracy, its all out in plain site for anyone with open eyes and ears. Connect the dots ppl.

Distant Cousins? Yeah, no big deal.

Both Pro War? Just politics as usual.

Both rich white guys? Just politics as usual.

Both members of Skull and Bones (which also has many other high level government officials): Now I'm seeing a pattern

Kerry gives up before votes are counted, based on a verbal on numbers from the highly republican secretary of state of ohio: Pattern continues, starting to look like Al Gores trick of just rolling over and playing dead when Bush took the first election.

Kerry doesn't even question or raise the issue of electronic voting machines not being reliable and being unsecure: Pattern reinforcement.

Connect the dots.

Now connect the dots with the evidence from 9/11.
Now connect the dots with the evidence about the Iraq war.

No conspiracy to be found, just a dumb, TV addicted nation. We're in the midst of being taken over EXACTLY how Germany was taken over by hitler.

step 1: Big disaster to make people afraid.
step 2: Set laws up to take away civil liberties of masses and enact laws for dictatorship.
step 3: Declare a state of emergency and take over the country.

That was hitler's 3 point plan. We have gotten up to step 2. Of course, who needs to declare a state of emergency and take over the country when we can just amend the constitution and let arnold take over -- oh, another "coincidence", Arnold's father was in the Nazi party. And he is a shitty governator too, by the way.

 

You just controdicted youself in the same paragraph.

There is a difference between denial and facing reality.

 

You misread what I wrote.

I did not contradict myself. I said that no two presidential candidates have been as closely related as Bush and Kerry. Then I went on to say the most (actually all) of the presidents DO have a large number of noble descendents, like both Bush and Kerry have. I was referring to two seperate things. I never inferred that the other presidents were as closely related as Bush and Kerry are related.

 

How many have candidates had their geneology traced back to the 16th century?