Makeing sense of Kierkegaard.

Discussion in 'Existentialism' started by Fallout55, Sep 13, 2007.

  1. Fallout55

    Fallout55 Banned

    Messages:
    2,138
    Likes Received:
    0
    So I'm reading Kierkegaard and finding it very hard to understand exactly what he is trying to say. I am takeing a class wich helps alot and also have some other books that simplify his writings but am still having some troubles with with problema 1 from "Fear and Trembaling"

    Mainly where he speaks on the paradox of faith. He says that the indvidual with faith emegerges from being subordinate from the universal(ethical) and is superior in his faith but it is a paradox because he was once part of the universal? I think i may be getting this all wrong, if have a copy of the book open to problema 1 and let me know what you get out of it.

    I'd like to note im on some strong opiates(pill my friend gave me, not sure what type) and this stuff is still giving me a head ach.
     
  2. Jack_Glycon

    Jack_Glycon Member

    Messages:
    19
    Likes Received:
    0
    The whole point of Kierkegaard's indirect method is that it can't easily be understood. You aren't meant to make sense of it, you're meant to feel that it is true.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice