Marijuana Does Not Cause Lung Cancer

Discussion in 'Cannabis and Marijuana' started by C123-473, Aug 31, 2006.

  1. C123-473

    C123-473 Member

    Messages:
    371
    Likes Received:
    1
    http://www.counterpunch.org/gardner07022005.html

    [size=+2]Study: Smoking Marijuana Does Not Cause Lung Cancer[/size]

    [size=+2]By FRED GARDNER
    [/size]


    [size=+3]M[/size][size=-1]arijuana smoking -"even heavy longterm use"- does not cause cancer of the lung, upper airwaves, or esophagus, Donald Tashkin reported at this year's meeting of the International Cannabinoid Research Society. Coming from Tashkin, this conclusion had extra significance for the assembled drug-company and university-based scientists (most of whom get funding from the U.S. National Institute on Drug Abuse).[/size]

    ...

    All the odds ratios turned out to be less than one (one being equal to the control group's chances)!

    ...

    [size=-1]There was time for only one question, said the moderator, and San Francisco oncologist Donald Abrams, M.D., was already at the microphone: "You don't see any positive correlation, but in at least one category [marijuana-only smokers and lung cancer], it almost looked like there was a negative correlation, i.e., a protective effect. Could you comment on that?"[/size]

    [size=-1]"Yes," said Tashkin. "The odds ratios are less than one almost consistently, and in one category that relationship was significant, but I think that it would be difficult to extract from these data the conclusion that marijuana is protective against lung cancer. But that is not an unreasonable hypothesis." [/size]
     
  2. teh-horace

    teh-horace for your pleasure

    Messages:
    8,114
    Likes Received:
    4
    whether or not it doesn't

    you're always going to hear that it does







    :( thus is life
     
  3. mr.greenxxx

    mr.greenxxx Not an Average Bear

    Messages:
    8,867
    Likes Received:
    3
    this doesnt make me wana smoke less or more, its a nice thing to know- but it doesnt really change anything for me :S
     
  4. teh-horace

    teh-horace for your pleasure

    Messages:
    8,114
    Likes Received:
    4
    haha, exactly
     
  5. TheMadcapSyd

    TheMadcapSyd Titanic's captain, yo!

    Messages:
    11,392
    Likes Received:
    21
    Old news, literally.
     
  6. MikeE

    MikeE Hip Forums Supporter HipForums Supporter

    Messages:
    5,409
    Likes Received:
    628
    Whether or not it gives you lung cancer, anything that makes you cough can't be good for your breathing apperatus.

    Nothing is all good.
     
  7. digitalldj

    digitalldj Canucks ftw!

    Messages:
    5,989
    Likes Received:
    1
    exactly.

    inhaling anything besides oxygen isnt good for you, and when it comes to lung cancer, personally i think alot of it has to do with genes, many old men have been smoking pipes, ciggerrettes, cigars etc. for 50+ years and will never devellop lung cancer, yet somone who smokes for 2 years might, it's all on chance, and i'm sure inhaling weed smoke raises the risk regardless of what any site says.
     
  8. EllisDTripp

    EllisDTripp Green Secessionist

    Messages:
    1,682
    Likes Received:
    7
    Actually, something that makes you cough could help your lungs expel trapped particles and gunk.
     
  9. MikeE

    MikeE Hip Forums Supporter HipForums Supporter

    Messages:
    5,409
    Likes Received:
    628
    I think a joint is a source of the particles and gunk.

    Cleaner stoning through vaporizers!

    I know that my pipes are not the cleanest way to smoke.
     
  10. Willy_Wonka_27

    Willy_Wonka_27 Surrender to the Flow

    Messages:
    14,294
    Likes Received:
    22
    you stoners suck....:X

    although i realize this is old news...:confused:

    peace...:)
     
  11. EnterTheFarside

    EnterTheFarside the cats pajamas

    Messages:
    1,425
    Likes Received:
    0
  12. borat

    borat Member

    Messages:
    438
    Likes Received:
    0
    it might not cause cancer but it's definitely not good for your lungs...
     
  13. ~peace~

    ~peace~ Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,797
    Likes Received:
    2
    same here. It is good to know because that could make it a step closer to being more accepted as a medicine. im still not going to smoke and more just because i know this.
     
  14. passittotheleft

    passittotheleft Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,721
    Likes Received:
    1
    They've actually proved it to destroy cancer cells.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice