You're a struggling freelance photographer looking for the big scoop. You find yourself somewhere in England, where huge floods have devestated the area. You're about to give up and head home when you see someone struggling in the water. As you get closer you realise it's our Prime Minister, David Cameron. He's been caught in the floodwater and has clearly got only a minute or so to live. You could take a photograph of our country's leader perishing in this disaster, an iconic photograph that would surely be heralded as the symbol for such a trying time for our country. You would win dozens of awards for it, not to mention enough money to retire on. The only negative is that you'd have the death of David Cameron weighing on your conscience for the rest of your life. Or you could tie a rope to something sturdy and throw the other end to him, pulling him to safety as he grabs onto it. You'd have a very brief stint as "the one who saved our leader", but you'd never have such an opportunity for an award-winning photo again. With these two choices in mind, here's the dilemma you will face: Black and white, or colour?
I Vote For Black And White, Unlike Colour It Really Highlights The Pathos Of An Event That Will Go Down In History.... Now If We Could Just Arrange For Our Prime Minister To Be In The Same Circumstance, Then I Really Couldn't Give A Damn Either Way, Just As Long As The Bitch Drowned.... Cheers Glen.
Let him perish, the country will be better without him. It would never weigh on my mind, I'd think I'd done us all a favour. That mans forehead is far too smooth, it isn't natural.
