More evidence that war on Iraq was unnecessary.

Emails recently released under the freedom of information act, show that Brits spun the necessity for a war with a country already restrained. But Tony Blair is now a peace envoy in the area...how bizarre is that?

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...show-iraq-dossier-uwasu-sexed-up-1643960.html

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/stand...for Blair's peace role/article.do?expand=true

 

Funny thing the Brits pay him a salary of 400,000 pounds a year while he's a peace envoy, yet he's started a faith based foundation:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/faith/article4029761.ece

Sorry Mr. Blair but your message is fertile as a huge stack of ripe manure.

It's been my experience that your faith and your foundation create conflict. How many Muslim kids did we kill with shock and awe? How many Muslim kids were killed in Gaza? How many in Lebanon? How many from economic restrictions inflicted because Israel wants the Muslim world held captive to their interests?

You know where you can put your phony faith based foundation?

 

I can't remember the name of the website, but there was some info on how Bush hooked up Blair with campaign money from corporate America; companies like Raytheon .. defense contractors

 

You gotta bet Blair got a pay off and continues to do so. It's criminal.

 

Darn it I wish I could remember the site, the person had made a number of excellent videos.

Your post the other day made me think about it... I thought it was bushwatch.com.. but that wasn't it

 

When the economics of the world are falling apart, why is it that those that lead us into these wars are still sitting on easy street, and with Blair under the guise of religious zealoutry. Cheney doesn't dare play that hand. Bush got his faith based iniatives passed the US citizens, but I don't think we'll fall for it again.

 

found it.. it was called bushflash

the site is still up, but only one video... I remember the guy saying he was going to hang it up as he really didn't have the time anymore.

But there are still some on youtube... though limited

 

Where's the news media on this? Why can't we find out the net worth of the Blair Foundation? And I wonder why it's tied to Yale and the education of our youth at Yale. This is a man that lead us into an unnecessary war. And now he forms a foundation, why no press why no release or financial disclosure. I want to follow the money...the cash flow, don't you?

Tony Blair hyped the threat of Iraq, we sent our kids to die there we spent billions on it and it's private contractors. We are watching our economies deconstruct. But they have a right to some sort of implied privacy why are they allowed to manipulate us?

 

I want to know where these bastards get their funding...why is that so difficult to ascertain. Lie to us about a threat to our security, that's easy to pass off when people are worried about personal security. Try and find out where these putzes get their new clothes and multiple homes and it's impossible... fancy cars and nannies and it's damn near impossible. But it's the Christian/free market thing to do??? They are saving Muslims from death from malaria...yeah I buy that. DON'T YOU!

Where was Tony Blair when Gaza was being bombed with US arms? Where was Britains peace envoy when a population locked in and confined to a small area was bombed with western armaments? I don't remember seeing Tony on the news seeking a reasonable resolution. Where was he when Lebanon was inflicted with Israeli bombs. Lebanon a democratic country?

 

If you are still perplexed on Wednesday, gardner I'll look some things up, just for you.
Hows that?

 

These guys that created this war...how rich are they today?

 

Look forward to it. Plan on celebrating on Tuesday?

 

the aim of these wars was to destroy western civillization nothing more nothing less. the people responsible drained the treasury leaving a massive debt , in fact an economic crisis. whilst they waged war the treasury was looted. these people need to be brought to trial and imprisoned and be made to finger their handlers.

i feel sorry for the yanks who have been destroyed by them but they are happy to be destroyed because it makes jehovah happy.

 

Nagh...I don't bother. Now St Georges day is another matter :cheers2:

 

My little rant:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...show-iraq-dossier-uwasu-sexed-up-1643960.html

Do you know how long the Indy has wanted to attach the words "sexed up" to that dossier? A very long time. Sorry, but if anything has been "sexed up" it is that article. Dissapointed.

What part has done this: "spun the necessity for a war with a country already restrained." ?

Given the dossier has been gone over and over and over.
Is this anything new?

The claims contained in the 'September' and 'Iraq' Dossiers were called into question when weapons of mass destruction were not found in Iraq, and the dossiers were encompassed by House of Commons Foreign Affairs Select Committee inquiry. The Committee subsequently reported that the sources should have been credited, and that the dossier should have been checked by ministers before being released. The dossier had only been reviewed by a group of civil servants operating under Alastair Campbell. The committee stated that the publication was "almost wholly counter-productive" and in the event only served to undermine the credibility of the government's case.

The controversy over the 'Iraq Dossier' was mentioned frequently in the government's conflict with the BBC over the claim in the 'September Dossier' that Iraq could deploy biological weapons within 45 minutes of an order to do so, and the controversy surrounding the death of Doctor David Kelly. Andrew Gilligan, the BBC journalist who wrote a report which claimed that the September Dossier had been deliberately exaggerated, stated before the Hutton Inquiry that recalling the February Dossier had led him to file his report based on his interview with David Kelly without seeking confirmation from other sources.

 

Tony Blair is not the Middle East PEACE Envoy.
Although he might speak of it, it is not in his remit per se.
He certainly is not on 400,000 pounds a year.
I think you may have known that though.

The two parties concerned don't share your concerns.
Which is all that really matters.

Company Details - THE TONY BLAIR FAITH FOUNDATION

Registered No.06198959

Address: 66 LINCOLNS INN FIELDS, LONDON, WC2A 3LH
Typerivate company limited by guarantee without share capital claiming exemption under Section 30 of the act

Incorporation Date:02-04-2007
Status:Large unquoted company
Last Accounts Filed up to:30-04-2008
Last Accounts Analysed:30-04-2008

Nature of business SIC:91310 - Activities of religious organisations

https://www.ukdata.com/company-listings/Th-316.html

(easy enough to follow)

 

http://www.newkerala.com/topstory-fullnews-90654.html

 

Easy enough to follow if I had 18 pounds to pay for the report.

 

Your words were: "Funny thing the Brits pay him a salary of 400,000 pounds a year"

Your article states: "The British Foreign Office has footed a 400,000 pounds bill towards office costs and expenses for Blair"

Spot the difference.

"Senior Whitehall sources said they do not expect Blair to stay in the job given by President George W Bush in June 2007 after he stepped down as Prime Minister."

 

Well, you did want to know.
It is a small price to pay.