There is no need to use a comma before the word but, perhaps sometimes but certainly not in the context of the OP. People on here are doing that a lot lately and it's really starting to piss me off. No human has ever seen the amoeba that existed long in the past in the primordial soup and the amoeba ceased to exist some considerable time ago. It is real. Q: How many Amoebas does it take to change a lightbulb? A: 2. No, 4. No, 8. No, 16. 32, 64, 128, 256, 512 stoooooooooop amoebas stop!!!
If that pisses you off, you are actually suppose to put a comma in front of and. I learned that in me GED book.
IT is a phish thing... actually i think its from something ken kesey related but they talk about IT as something universal, the story of everyones lives. "Now, man, that alto man last night had "IT"- held it once he found it; I've never seen a guy that could hold so long. I wanted to know what "IT" meant." "Ah well" - Dean laughed - "Now you're asking me impon-de-rables--- Ahem! Here's a guy and everybody's there, right? Up to him to put down what's on everybody's mind. He starts the first chorus then lines up his ideas, people, yeah, yeah, but get it then he rises his fate and has to blow equal to it. All of a sudden somewhere in the middle of the chorus he gets it- everybody looks up and knows; they listen; he picks it up and carries. Time stops. He's filling empty space with the substance of our lives, confessions of his bellybottom strain, rememberance of ideas, rehashes of old blowing. He has to blow across bridges and come back and do it with such infinate feeling soul- exploratory for the tune of the moment that everybody knows it's not the tune that counts, but IT--" -IT IT's invisible, IT's real
If negative matter (anti-matter) and energy exists, how can we ignore the implication that negative time exists as well? Stephen Hawking argues that God cannot exist because "time" did not exist until the creation of the universe (which he asserts happened spontaneously and he bases this solely on the observable existence of photons). I find it very problematic that he accept the notion of spontaneous universe creation, while ignoring the very logical possibilty of a multiverse and extra dimensionality, which many physicists refer to when trying to explain the existence and behavior of subatomic particles and quantum mechanics in the first place. How can Hawking presume that God doesn't exist and yet accept that photons can spontaneously exist and then cease to exist. To me it's like someone arguing that unicorns exist and that they sometimes appear and disappear inside atoms, but in the next breath, arguing that anyone who believes in subatomic goblins is an idiot. WTF?
Air does not exist. It is a substance that was created in the minds of the government in order to control us. See, if they can get us to believe in something that we cannot see or touch, they can do ANYTHING.