Obama Calls For National Civilian Stasi

http://www.prisonplanet.com/obama-calls-for-national-civilian-stasi.html

 

Is he being misquoted? Is he talking about empowering the security of civilians or is he actually suggesting an organized "force"?

And by funded, is he alluding to universal healthcare?

I think he was misquoted - but it's possible he's talking about an actually civilian army...

 

What does the bold-faced print suggest to you??

 

http://www.infowars.com/?p=3417

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars
July 16, 2008

It appears candidate Obama, if elected, fully intends to recruit young citizens into something he calls a “national security force,” apparently a large paramilitary group “just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded” as the U.S. military. Obama made passing reference to this disturbing idea in a speech delivered in Chicago on July 2. As should be expected, the corporate media, with the exception on the Chicago Tribune, completely ignored the statement and its implications.
It was picked up by the real media, that is to say the bloggers, and Joseph Farah of WorldNetDaily. “If we’re going to create some kind of national police force as big, powerful and well-funded as our combined U.S. military forces, isn’t this rather a big deal?” asked Farah. “I thought Democrats generally believed the U.S. spent too much on the military. How is it possible their candidate is seeking to create some kind of massive but secret national police force that will be even bigger than the Army, Navy, Marines and Air Force put together?”
Farah should know there is little to no difference between Democrats and Republicans — they both take orders from the Council on Foreign Relations, the Bilderbergers, David Rockefeller’s globalist coterie, the Trilateral Commission, and various one-world foundations and cliques.
It is no secret Obama’s top advisor is Zbigniew Brzezinski, a close Rockefeller protégé, a founding member and former director of the Trilateral Commission, and a CFR member. Obama’s wife, Michelle, is a member of the Chicago branch of the CFR. Big donors to the Obama campaign basically constitute a who’s who of corporate and Wall Street banking interests, including JP Morgan Chase & Co., Goldman Sachs, Lehman Brothers, and Citigroup. Disgraced former Obama advisor, James A. Johnson, former Fannie Mae CEO and consummate Washington insider, is a member of the American Friends of Bilderberg, the Trilateral Commission and the Council on Foreign Relations.
Farah seems unwilling to make crucial differences when it comes to Democrats and Republicans, but in this instance we can forgive, at least for the moment, because he is asking all the right questions.
“Are we talking about creating a police state here?” he asked in a July 15 article posted on the WND website.

The U.S. Army alone has nearly 500,000 troops. That doesn’t count reserves or National Guard. In 2007, the U.S. Defense budget was $439 billion.
Is Obama serious about creating some kind of domestic security force bigger and more expensive than that?
If not, why did he say it? What did he mean?


Obama — or rather his handlers, consisting of dedicated minions who work for the global elite, the international bankers, the corporate fascists — are serious, dead serious, about creating a “domestic security force.”
It has nothing to do with al-Qaeda, either, a phantom force Joseph Farah and his neocon buddies believe pose a serious threat to America. It has everything to do with subduing those of us who may resist an accelerated move toward fascist corporate globalization, one-world government, and the effort to turn the planet into a slave labor gulag where half the population exists on less than a dollar or two a day. It’s all about forcing us to accept the New Serfdom at gunpoint.
In the months and years ahead, with the engineered deconstruction of the economy, a “domestic security force” possibly the size of the U.S. military will be required to “to prevent collusion and maintain security dependence among the vassals,” as Rockefeller functionary Brzezinski might describe it.
Something of this size and scope will be required, especially with the very real prospect of foods riots and civil unrest as America is reduced to a third world cesspool, an eventuality if the NWO has its way.
In the meantime, after Obama is elected – or McCain, it really makes no difference – they globalists may be recruiting your neighbors or kids to do their bidding.





​

 

Well, to be honest it suggests that a civilian secured force deserves to be well-funded, according to Obama. I don't know if it implies an armed force, or some other kind of force. It certainly suggests a powerful force nonetheless.

 

He was talking about his plans to double the size of the peace corps and quadruple the scope of americorps.

Terrifying.

 

By this logic, the salvation army is invading our shores.

"We should have a civilian corps that is as effective in what they do as our military is in what it does, and we don't have that right now," said Obama

 

Where does he say that?? Quotes please.

And since when is the Peace Corps a domestic "security force"??

Do you know what you're talking about?

 

I think the speech was called, A Call To Service.

"We'll send more college graduates to teach and mentor our young people. We'll call on Americans to join an Energy Corps to conduct renewable energy and environmental cleanup projects in their neighborhoods. We'll enlist veterans to help other vets find jobs and support, and to be there for our military families. And we'll also grow our Foreign Service, open consulates that have been shuttered, and double the size of the Peace Corps by 2011 to renew our diplomacy. "​

"And we'll use technology to connect people to service. We'll expand USA Freedom Corps to create an online network where Americans can browse opportunities to volunteer. You'll be able to search by category, time commitment, and skill sets; you'll be able to rate service opportunities, build service networks, and create your own service pages to track your hours and activities. This will empower more Americans to craft their own service agenda, and make their own change from the bottom up."​

The whole speech is here.

http://www.theodoresworld.net/archives/2008/07/obamas_civilian_security_force.html

 

OK, so how does this equate to a national security force?

Secondly, where does he suggest that this was what he was referring to in the speech given in Colorado Springs?

 

The link you provided is quite interesting, Lode. I am wondering why the reference to a "national security force" was removed from the transcript.

 

As I've stated, It's a security force in the same way the salvation army is an army.

The whole speech is there. Judge it for what you will. I see nothing sinister about increasing the side of Americorps and the Peace Corps.

 

Here's the Speech.

 

But since when is Americorps and the Peace Corps NATIONAL SECURITY FORCES, and why was all mention of this "national security force" removed from the transcripts??

 

Who's transcripts?

 

Because it was a verbal slip up of Obama referencing his real goal of a secret police force which he accidentally brought up in his speech about extending the scope of civil service.

That's your argument essentially right?

Anyone who watches the speech will understand the context.

 

secret police force? kinda like the gestapo huh??

wow,,who needs the hitler youth when you have the gestapo??

 

That was tongue in cheek.

 

i fail to see the correlation between the peace corp,ameri corp and this statement,

“We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.”

are you saying he intends to turn ameri corp into a security force?

um dont people who make 26 minute speeches generally write them before they take the stage??
im not really getting your argument here lode..