Did anyone see the clip of Rumsfield on the Daily Show last night? In a speech he was giving he said something along the lines of, "For all we know Saddam Hussein is alive and well in the hills of Afganistan". I cant believe he confused Hussein with Bin Laden. I mean really does this administration need to be in the White House for another four years? You just can't make stupid mistakes like that especially on national TV. plus They seem to me like they really dont care whats going on with the United States when they do stuff like this. Does anyone agree? And I agree with Alec Baldwin. Colin Powell could of had a brilliant political career had he not joined the Bush administration. It's really depressing to see this. I really feel sorry for Mr. Powell. It's good to see he is laying low and out of sight of the public. That was a good move. anyways if Bush does get re-elected I think there should definately be a couple forced resignations and even impeachments. We all know Bush wasn't the only on behind all the lies and shit the last four years. Lets not make him the scapegoat. The entire Bush administration must be put under investigation. am I right or wrong?
You're right, but you are only hitting the tip of the iceberg. The Bush Administration is not the only evil administration, If Kerry is elected, I can guarantee you it will be along the same lines as the Bush Administration. Both of the canidates are Pro-War, how brainwashed can the American Public Be to choose between two pro-war, skull and bones canidates, who may even be related, this is outrageous. The Bush Administration shouldn't be the only ones under investigation, so should EVERY SINGLE American Politician, they ALLL have secrets, I can Guarantee you (Possibly with the Exclusion of Kucinich, Nader, and the handful of Politicans that the elite make sure NEVER get elected). Peace and Love, Dan
Sorry kiddo, you can't guarantee anything! Why are you so brainwashed. You've lost the ability to reason. No, Kerry wouldn't have started the war! Who cares about Skull and Bones, there are more important things to worry about (unless you're a teen with too much time on your hands, don't do so many drugs and get out more!). Who cares if they are related (obviously very distantly)? Do you agree 100% with your relatives about politics? Ahhhh!! They're all out to get us!!! SOS!!!
Angel, don't pay much mind to Green thumb...not because of his disagreement with your points, but his attempting to belittle you with ridicule and condescension, even outright insults. It's not worth the effort in even replying to statements like that. Bush is not the scapegoat for anything. All he is really is a spokesman...a puppet. Those making the critical decisions are Cheney, Ashcroft, Rumsfeld, Carl Rove and other corporate elites. Bush really isn't the issue, but rather the administrations as a entity...a "barge" if you will, with a distinct agenda. And although Kerry is certainly not much different than Bush in policy (he said he'd still vote for the Iraq war if he could do it over again, not to mention his support of "Free trade"--corporate global empire) I think he'd be a bit more toned down about his approach, less blatantly arrogant and defiant towards anyone who even slightly disagrees, like how Bush and Co. now are. The most bothersome thing about Kerry (and the Democratic party in general) is their apparent refusal to talk about any of these issues openly. If Kerry at least *spoke* like Ralph Nader...even just a little, I'd be more inclined to take him seriously. But neither major political candidate will so much as *mention* NAFTA, the FTAA, corporate hegemony, etc. which are hot-button issues in today's world. Won't touch them. Why? Because they know that their corporate agenda is under assault from a growing populist movement, and for Kerry to broach the subject would call for him to become "too radical". And then what? the 2 party system would collapse from under its own weight. The deck of cards would spill over. Or at least the democratic party would reclaim its title as "opposition party", or "party of the people". Both major parties will do whatever it takes to keep their class-based empire in place, otherwise they would at least respond to the growing number of arguments raised by the common Joe. Yet they remain silent on the most important issues...BOTH parties do this and an increasing number of people are realizing this and becoming agitated, literally. A vote for Kerry, this election is not really a vote FOR Kerry, but a vote against the current rulers. So I say vote for Kerry. Vote for the democratic party one last time. One, to get the cowboys out, and two, so Kerry will be watched like a hawk by the newly politicized american public, and shoudl Kerry fuck up, he'll wind up shooting himself in the foot, and then the democratic party as a whole....then the 2party system itself. We're living in rapidly changing times, whether people are cognizant of it or not.
Revo that was incredible. I've never enjoyed reading a post so much. Thankyou. Everyone should definately read the post before this one. Especially the Bush and Kerry supporters. What are your thoughts on this?
