sending sniffable chem internationally in standard envelope?

Edit

 

not that risky...unless you get caught

 

If it's only a small amount and it does get seized you'll probably just get a letter from customs. I don't think they have the desire or resources to set up a sting for every gram of a substance seized, but I could be wrong.

 

edit

 

Step one. Absolutely for sure ask this thread in public on a public forum, and even say what it is youre shipping and in what container.

step two. ???

step three. profit

 

Depends where you are but a small amount would get ya a letter at the most. Get a vacum packer or if ya know what olbis oil is a couple of drops on the envolope. Theres that many standard letters get shipped every day they cant check them all, the dogs are usually tied up in ports on busts etc so i wouldnt sweat a letter. Most stuff iive had shipped was always in small amounts and never had any problems.

One guy told me he used to ship coke around by buying packing the shit tight and getting aloe vera and rubbing it on the internal package as it dries it turns green if its the right stuff and masks the smell, could be bullshit and i never tried it, too much hassle.

If ya want try sending it to me and ill let ya know if it arrives

 

Some materials are more aromatic than others. i wouldn't risk sending anything with a recognizable smell.

Of course, i would NEVER consider doing something like shipping N,N, DMT in the mail, but it has a light floral scent that would NEVER be recognized by a drug sniffing dog if i chose to do so. Same with Mescaline acetate, which will smell vinegary if not 100% evapped.

i'm not sure how aromatic sniffable drugs are but i suspect not very, especially in low volume and when carefully packaged. Just package carefully, in a couple layers of paper or plastic or foil. Follow international addressing, paperwork and postage rate regulations to the letter. And, of course, do not use a real return address . . . .

 

alright thanks got the answers I need

mailing AMT in normal envelopes (like how i've received it before) is retarded - I wonder how it even made it to me.

 

This is one of the biggest postal red flags out there, and aside from suspicious packaging/smells/sounds, the #1 sign of contraband in mail. They do scan every return address on every envelope. They do run them through computers. They do inspect envelopes/packages with fake return addresses.

 

Hmmm, interesting. Good thing i don't do this.

But, i must ask (i am an information junkie): How can this be true given the volume of mail that passes through the postal system, especially the volume of business (#10) envelopes that go through? Who collects and collates this data? Is it being compared to up-to-date information from Google Maps or some other source? Homeland Security? Again, i kinda doubt it for business size envelopes. The USPS is always complaining about being underfunded, underresourced, threatens to constantly raise the price of postage and cease Saturday delivery.

Honestly, i would think NO return address would be riskier, and/or improper packaging.

As far as i know they only scan the To: address, in particular the Zip code and that's why they ask that we use blue or black ink and block letters with NO pumctuation.

i would recommend using an "authentic" fake address that uses a REAL zip code correlated with a real street name and numbers close to real numbers on that street with that zip code.

 

computers scan both the "to" address and the return address, and run a simple check against government records of zip codes and what not. If there is a fake return address, this is a big red flag. There is unlikely to be a non-criminal reason to use a fake return address. No return addresses are not as suspicious at all, it's better to do this. Lots of mail is sent out, personal letters and what not, from people to other people who don't want them to know where they are, etc. But a FAKE return address . . . uh oh. Now if it's just off by a little bit from a real address, they might just think it's a typo or something, but a totally non-existent return address is like . . . get ze dogs

 

an even better idea is to look up the address of a pizza hut or convenience store nearby you on google maps, and then use that as the return address.

 

Definately would recommend keeping it close to a real one. And yea, typos are the reason why i believe this would work better than no return address. The privacy arguement (no return address) does not fly in this era of postmodern "Patriot Act" security. We no longer have personal liberties or privacy and are fools if we believe otherwise.

Absolutely, positively best way to do drug deals/trades/gifts/exchanges according to Bruce Margolian (famous 420 lawyer who's been around since the 1960's) is to be in a rental vehicle moving on the freeway at the posted speed limit with the radio on high, the windows open, and the occupants whispering into each other's ears.

This is the most paranoid and the most safe. As techniques move out from this style, the techniques themselves (tho often not the cognitions of the participants) become less paranoid and less safe . . . .

 

I would go with no return address, out of everything shipped to me over the years only one guy sent stuff to me from the Philippines with a return address, safe to say it wasn't his. No idea whether it was to make it look legit or to get the stuff returned if undelivered to some empty house/flat.

I only got stuff shipped twice from the US and both times there was no return address.

I wouldn't want to send shit out that might be sent back to me to be undeliverable.

pack it, post it and forget about it, im sure whoever you send it to will let you know it arrived.

 

in the land of oz at least mail is scanned by post code only and the address and return address isn't read until it reaches the local postal sorting office unless the scanner can't read the post code. customs may be different though.

 

no return address is another red-flag. just putting that out there. get a PO box.