The Highest Level Of Thc, Whats The Best Marijuana Plant?

Hi i been looking around on the net and the highest level of THC on a marijuana plant is the Skunk Haze THC Content: 20%-22%
anyone else know any plant with higher THC levels?
thanks

 

It's a plant... therefore it's variable. Some big thc plants are: white widow, papaya, ice, purple haze, skunk.

 

so no %?

 

Silver haze is high, it has about 20%

 

white widow has about the same too

 

1) G-13 is 28% THC?

2) Matanuska Valley "Thunderfuck"(AKA Tundra) in Alaska at 36-39% THC reported.

3) White Russian was gauged at 22% THC.

I don't know about you guys, but I want some Thunderfuck.

 

When they say 22% thc...it is the percentage of resinous glands eh? not the percentage of the actual thc oil...Cuz there are like two schools. Those who evaluate in the 1 to 5% thc, the other more than 15% and so..

Having 250mg of pure thc with a gram of plant seems kinda ridiculous.

 

holy shit! i want some!!

 

i had alaskan thunderfuck about 5 years ago. it was grown in alaska and brought to us on a special occasion. anyway, it ultimately ranked number 2 on my list of all-time best bud. my experience with white widow from the Dutch countryside is number 1. but of all the other bud i've had in Holland, the "american" bred thunderfuck topped most of them. excellent shit. i would never pack more than a third of a bowl and i'd get completely fried.
peace.

 

^^nice, i want it...I know blueberry is a pretty high percentage, around 20%...just do some digging on some seedbank websites and you'll find something

 

mmmmm blueberry

 

I want me some thunderfuck!

 

"rolls eyes at whole thread and everyone in it"

 

yeah, i was going to comment, but....ehh....not really worth the effort.

so i'll just say that this is fucking retarded and leave it at that...

 

We're just talking about the average recorded potency of certain plants. What's retarded about that?

 

your never gonna catch meee, your wasting your time, forget about it

 

i cant understand why some people have to be so negative all the time. and they dont even care to enlighten anyone as to why they are angry at the thread, they just feel liek they have to get the negative out

 

i like this thread but honestly its plants people its not exact...obviously they probably grew the tested plants in these super sterile labs with best equipement and someone constantly tending to them so they can get the highest thc percentage.

 

If you're trying to say that there is no possible way for a pothead scientist to test the THC content of a plant, you're damn wrong. However, it depends on how the plant is grown just as much as what strain it is. From recorded information, one could gauge some weed as higher in THC % than others, but saying that ALL of X strain are Y% is just kind of.. untruthful.

(not a direct response to jo)

I think a more accurate measurement would consist of.. collecting bunches of weed off the streets, from your regular dealers, and THEN testing them. That would be better to represent the kind of shit you're getting.

 

sorta why this thread is bs. well its not the thread but the statistical content of discussion. anyone ever wondered how they get those percentages? and how they can relate those percentages to other plants? the only thing that any data of this type is valid for is in the plant that it was procured from. if you got 1000 people and weighed their hair, would you be able to make accurate judgement about the portion of ones body is hair? would you be able to say 'red haired people have this % hair, asian people this % hair, etc'? no. because each person will grow their hair differently. the genes only determine the type of hair and the position and density of follicles on the person. just like a species of marijuana will have certain types of cannabinoids, certain number of resin glands, spread of glands, etc, but the amount of thc generated is dependant on environment, pllination, storage before testing, etc.