This may seem like an improbable proposition. Is Hell exothermic or endothermic? The problem can only end in one conclusion, for the proof lies in the scientific. Postulating that if souls exist, therefore souls must have mass. Surely a group of souls will exhibit greater mass, then at what rate are souls leaving or entering that which we find utterly aghast? And in proving my argument with empirical proof will I seal my own fate? We can safely assume that once a soul reaches Hell it will not leave. Since no souls are leaving, Hell cannot be a vast bottomless pit. But some religions fanatically state that you will surely go to Hell if you don’t believe that Hell is a vast, bottomless pit! Hence, their argument is without merit because I will offer proof to the contrary. I argue that there are more people inclined to be non-religious, therefore we can safely assume that these non-believers will travel down to Hell momentarily. Irrefutably, the rates in Hell will increase exponentially. How can this be? With birth and death rates as they are surely the rate of volume will increase. For Boyle’s Law states that in order for temperature and pressure to remain the same, the ratio of mass and volume must remain constant without any significant decrease. And in order for that to happen, Hell has to expand consistently, let me explain. If hell expands slower than the ratio of souls entering it, then temperature and pressure will increase until all Hell breaks loose, however, if the expansion of Hell is greater than the increase in souls, then pressure and temperature will decrease until Hell freezes over, and that doesn’t need any more explanation. However, which theory is correct? If I accept the postulate stated by God that when Hell freezes over will I sprout wings, fly away, and become aerodynamic. Then the second argument is definitely not true, and the only thing remaining is to state without question, that all Hell will break loose and it is indeed exothermic.
